Present an overview of two classical experiments that demonstrated that DNA is the genetic material. Can RNA be the genetic material? Explain. What observations are consistent with the conclusion that DNA

Short Answer

Expert verified
Question: Describe two classical experiments that demonstrated DNA as the genetic material and explain if RNA can also serve as a genetic material. Answer: The Avery, MacLeod, and McCarty experiment in 1944 demonstrated that DNA is genetic material by observing the transformation of a harmless bacterium strain into a virulent strain due to the presence of heat-killed DNA-containing bacteria. The Hershey-Chase experiment in 1952 confirmed this by using radioactively-labeled bacteriophages and showing that their DNA, not proteins, was injected into bacteria cells as genetic material. RNA can also function as genetic material, as seen in some viruses like retroviruses, where RNA carries genetic information and can be converted into DNA for integration into a host cell's genome.

Step by step solution

01

Experiment 1: Avery, MacLeod, and McCarty Experiment

In 1944, Oswald Avery, Colin MacLeod, and Maclyn McCarty conducted an experiment that showed DNA is the genetic material. In this study, they worked with two different strains of a bacterium called Streptococcus pneumoniae - one was a virulent, disease-causing strain (S strain) with a smooth outer coating and the other was a non-virulent, non-disease causing strain (R strain) with a rough coating. They found that when they injected live R strain bacteria and heat-killed S strain bacteria into mice, the mice still got infected and died. Avery and his colleagues concluded that a substance in the heat-killed S strain bacteria transformed the harmless R strain bacteria into virulent S strain bacteria. Through a series of experiments, they determined that this transforming substance was DNA and thus concluded that DNA is genetic material.
02

Experiment 2: Hershey-Chase Experiment

In 1952, Alfred Hershey and Martha Chase conducted an experiment to confirm that DNA is the genetic material. They used a bacteriophage, which is a virus that infects bacteria. The bacteriophage infects the bacteria by injecting its genetic material, while the protein coat remains outside. They used radioactive isotopes to label the DNA and proteins of the bacteriophage. After allowing the phage to infect the bacteria, they separated the protein coat from the bacteria cells and found that the radioactivity from the DNA, and not the protein, was inside the bacteria cells. This proved that the genetic material injected into the bacteria was DNA, thus providing strong evidence that DNA is the genetic material.
03

Can RNA be the Genetic Material?

Yes, RNA can also function as genetic material. In some viruses, like retroviruses, RNA serves as the genetic material instead of DNA. Retroviruses have an enzyme called reverse transcriptase, which converts their RNA into DNA, which is then integrated into the host cell's DNA. This process shows that RNA carries the genetic information in these viruses. Moreover, RNA is thought to have played a central role in early life forms before the evolution of DNA.
04

Observations Consistent with DNA being the Genetic Material

There are several observations that support the conclusion that DNA is the genetic material: 1. The chemical composition of DNA provides the necessary information storage capacity required for genetic material, as its four nucleotide bases (A, T, C, and G) are arranged in various combinations to form the basis of the genetic code. 2. DNA can replicate itself during cell division, ensuring that the genetic information is passed on from one generation to the next. 3. DNA undergoes mutations that can change the genetic information, which can result in new traits being passed on to the offspring. These mutations form the basis for genetic variation, which is essential for evolution. 4. The discovery of the structure of DNA by James Watson and Francis Crick, which showed that the DNA molecule is a double helix with complementary base pairing, allowed for a clearer understanding of how DNA can store, transmit, and replicate genetic information.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Why is \(T_{m}\) related to base composition?

In this chapter, we first focused on the information that showed DNA to be the genetic material and then discussed the structure of DNA as proposed by Watson and Crick. We concluded the chapter by describing various techniques developed to study DNA. Along the way, we found many opportunities to consider the methods and reasoning by which much of this information was acquired. From the explanations given in the chapter, what answers would you propose to the following fundamental questions: (a) How were scientists able to determine that DNA, and not some other molecule, serves as the genetic material in bacteria and bacteriophages? (b) How do we know that DNA also serves as the genetic material in eukaryotes such as humans? (c) How was it determined that the structure of DNA is a double helix with the two strands held together by hydrogen bonds formed between complementary nitrogenous bases? (d) How do we know that G pairs with C and that A pairs with \(\mathrm{T}\) as complementary base pairs are formed? (e) How do we know that repetitive DNA sequences exist in eukaryotes?

What are the three major types of RNA molecules? How is each related to the concept of information flow?

What did the Watson-Crick model suggest about the replication of DNA?

When Avery and his colleagues had obtained what was concluded to be the transforming factor from the IIIS virulent cells, they treated the fraction with proteases, RNase, and DNase, followed in each case by the assay for retention or loss of transforming ability. What were the purpose and results of these experiments? What conclusions were drawn?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Biology Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free