An unapproved form of gene therapy, known as enhancement gene therapy, can create considerable ethical dilemmas. Why?

Short Answer

Expert verified
Short Answer: Enhancement gene therapy involves genetically modifying humans to improve their abilities beyond the norm, raising ethical concerns such as social inequity, potential harm to human identity and dignity, unintended consequences, issues with "playing God," and the need for regulation and oversight. These dilemmas arise from the potential benefits and drawbacks of enhancement gene therapy, making it a contentious and ethically challenging field.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding Enhancement Gene Therapy

Enhancement gene therapy refers to the genetic modification of human beings for the purpose of enhancing their physical, intellectual, or other abilities, beyond what is considered normal. This is in contrast to traditional gene therapy, which aims to treat or prevent genetic diseases. Enhancement gene therapy could involve techniques such as gene editing, stem cell manipulation, and other cutting-edge biotechnologies.
02

Exploring Potential Benefits and Drawbacks

There are potential benefits to enhancement gene therapy, including improved overall health and well-being, increased resilience to diseases, and a greater capacity for learning and problem-solving. On the other hand, there are also potential drawbacks, such as potential side effects, the risk of unforeseen consequences, and the possibility of exacerbating social inequalities.
03

Discussing Ethical Issues

Enhancement gene therapy raises several ethical dilemmas, including: 1. Inequity: There is concern that the wealthy would have greater access to enhancement gene therapy, leading to increased social inequalities in terms of health, intelligence, and opportunities. 2. Human identity and dignity: The idea of modifying human beings can be seen as disrespectful to the intrinsic worth of each person, potentially diminishing our sense of individuality and uniqueness. Additionally, there may be societal pressure to undergo enhancement procedures, which could reduce personal autonomy. 3. Unintended consequences: Despite good intentions, enhancement gene therapy could lead to unforeseen and potentially harmful consequences, such as the development of new diseases or the disruption of delicate genetic balances. 4. "Playing God": Some believe that enhancement gene therapy represents an attempt to manipulate human beings in ways that should be left to the natural world or a higher power. 5. Regulation and oversight: Given the experimental nature of the technology, questions may arise concerning adequate regulation and oversight of its development and use. By understanding the complexities and ethical dilemmas associated with enhancement gene therapy, it becomes clear why this unapproved form of gene therapy can create considerable ethical challenges and how addressing these concerns will be pivotal in determining the future direction of this technology.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Dominant mutations can be categorized according to whether they increase or decrease the overall activity of a gene or gene product. Although a loss-of- function mutation (a mutation that inactivates the gene product) is usually recessive, for some genes, one dose of the normal gene product, encoded by the normal allele, is not sufficient to produce a normal phenotype. In this case, a loss-of-function mutation in the gene will be dominant, and the gene is said to be haploinsufficient. A second category of dominant mutation is the gain- of-function mutation, which results in a new activity or increased activity or expression of a gene or gene product. The gene therapy technique currently used in clinical trials involves the "addition" to somatic cells of a normal copy of a gene. In other words, a normal copy of the gene is inserted into the genome of the mutant somatic cell, but the mutated copy of the gene is not removed or replaced. Will this strategy work for either of the two aforementioned types of dominant mutations?

Private companies are now offering personal DNA sequencing along with interpretation. What services do they offer? Do you think that these services should be regulated, and if so, in what way?

What limits the use of differences in restriction enzyme sites as a way of detecting point mutations in human genes?

Would you have your genome sequenced, if the price was affordable? Why or why not? If you answered yes, would you make your genome sequence publicly available? How might such information be misused?

There are more than 1000 cloned farm animals in the United States. In the near future, milk from cloned cows and their offspring (born naturally) may be available in supermarkets. These cloned animals have not been transgenically modified, and they are no different than identical twins. Should milk from such animals and their natural-born offspring be labeled as coming from cloned cows or their descendants? Why?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Biology Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free