Consider a population in which the frequency of allele \(A\) is \(p=0.7\) and the frequency of allele \(a\) is \(q=0.3,\) and where the alleles are codominant. What will be the allele frequencies after one generation if the following occurs? (a) \(w_{A A}=1, w_{A a}=0.9, w_{a a}=0.8\) (b) \(w_{A A}=1, w_{A a}=0.95, w_{a a}=0.9\) (c) \(w_{A A}=1, w_{A a}=0.99, w_{a a}=0.98\) (d) \(w_{A A}=0.8, w_{A a}=1, w_{a a}=0.8\)

Short Answer

Expert verified
Question: Calculate the updated allele frequencies for scenarios (a), (b), (c), and (d) after one generation, given the initial frequencies and fitness values of genotypes AA, Aa, and aa. a) Fitness values: \(w_{AA} = 1, w_{Aa} = 0.9, w_{aa} = 0.8\) b) Fitness values: \(w_{AA}=1, w_{Aa}=0.95, w_{aa}=0.9\) c) Fitness values: \(w_{AA}=1, w_{Aa}=0.99, w_{aa}=0.98\) d) Fitness values: \(w_{AA}=0.8, w_{Aa}=1, w_{aa}=0.8\) Initial allele frequencies: \(p = 0.7, q = 0.3\)

Step by step solution

01

(Calculate mean fitness of the population W)

We need to calculate the mean fitness of the population, W, using the given fitness values and initial frequencies. Using the formula, W = \(p^2w_{AA} + 2pqw_{Aa} + q^2w_{aa}\), and the values provided, we have \(W = (0.7^2 * 1) + (2 * 0.7 * 0.3 * 0.9) + (0.3^2 * 0.8)\).
02

(Find the new allele frequencies)

We use the calculated W along with the given initial frequencies p and q and genotype fitness values to calculate the new frequencies of alleles A and a using the formulas above. New frequency of A = (\(0.7^2 * 1 + 0.5 * 0.7 * 0.3 * 0.9\)) / \(W\), New frequency of a = (\(0.3^2 * 0.8 + 0.5 * 0.7 * 0.3 * 0.9\)) / \(W\). Do the same calculations for scenarios (b), (c), and (d) by plugging in the respective fitness values for each genotype. #b) Calculation of new frequencies with given fitness values# Calculate \(W\), new frequency of A, and new frequency of a as in (a) for the given fitness values \(w_{AA}=1, w_{Aa}=0.95, w_{aa}=0.9\) #c) Calculation of new frequencies with given fitness values# Calculate \(W\), new frequency of A, and new frequency of a as in (a) for the given fitness values \(w_{AA}=1, w_{Aa}=0.99, w_{aa}=0.98\) #d) Calculation of new frequencies with given fitness values# Calculate \(W\), new frequency of A, and new frequency of a as in (a) for the given fitness values \(w_{AA}=0.8, w_{Aa}=1, w_{aa}=0.8\) After calculating the new frequency values for each scenario, we will have the updated allele frequencies after one generation for all four cases.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Population Genetics
Population genetics is a branch of biology that studies the distribution of genetic variations within populations and how these variations change over time. Factors that affect genetic variation include mutations, genetic drift, gene flow, and natural selection. Allele frequency, a key concept in this field, measures how common an allele is in a population. By calculating and tracking allele frequencies, scientists can predict and understand evolutionary changes in populations.

When solving exercises related to population genetics, such as changes in allele frequencies, it is critical to account for all possible genetic combinations and their proportions in a population. This means taking into consideration the genotype frequencies and how they contribute to the next generation's gene pool. The allele frequencies will not change if the population is in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium, meaning that the population is not evolving. However, if certain forces like selection are at play, we can expect allele frequencies to shift as a response to these selective pressures.
Codominance
Codominance occurs when two different alleles at a locus are both fully expressed in a heterozygote, resulting in a phenotype that shows aspects of both alleles. Unlike in complete dominance, where the dominant allele masks the recessive allele, in codominance both alleles contribute to the phenotype. This becomes particularly important when calculating new allele frequencies because the genotypes will express new combinations of traits, making calculations more complex than in cases of complete dominance.

Let's say we are looking at flower color where red is codominant with white, resulting in flowers with both red and white patches. For such cases, genetic diagrams can be highly useful for visualizing and predicting the outcomes of crosses between different genotypes. Keep in mind that in codominant relationships, the heterozygous condition is just as crucial in calculating allele frequencies as the homozygous conditions.
Genotype Fitness
Genotype fitness, often symbolized by 'w', reflects the reproductive success of a genotype relative to other genotypes. It is a measure of survival and reproduction and is one of the factors that can cause allele frequencies to change over time. In population genetics calculations, the fitness of a genotype determines how much it contributes to the next generation's gene pool.

When analyzing problems like the one where different scenarios with varying fitness values are provided, it’s important to understand that genotypes with higher fitness will contribute more offspring to the next generation. This leads to a change in allele frequencies. In exercises, be alert for situations where the fitness of the heterozygote is between those of the homozygotes, as this can indicate a situation of stabilizing selection, or when the heterozygote fitness is higher, which could indicate overdominance or heterozygote advantage.
Hardy-Weinberg Principle
The Hardy-Weinberg principle is a fundamental concept in population genetics that provides a mathematical baseline for understanding genetic variation in a population under the assumption of no evolution occurring. According to this principle, allele and genotype frequencies in a large, randomly mating population remain constant across generations unless specific factors such as mutation, migration, genetic drift, nonrandom mating, or selection are present. The principle is based on a set of equations that predict the expected genotype frequencies from allele frequencies.

The usefulness of the Hardy-Weinberg principle lies in its role as a null hypothesis for detecting evolutionary forces. If observed genotype frequencies deviate from Hardy-Weinberg expectations, we can infer that evolutionary pressures might be at work. To solve exercises relating to the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium, it is essential to familiarize oneself with its equation: p² + 2pq + q² = 1, where p and q represent the frequencies of two alleles, and p², 2pq, and q² represent the genotype frequencies for the homozygous dominant, heterozygous, and homozygous recessive genotypes, respectively. This framework allows us to predict what a non-evolving population's genetic structure should look like, serving as a benchmark for studies of evolutionary change.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

In a population of 10,000 individuals, where 3600 are \(M M\) 1600 are \(N N,\) and 4800 are \(M N,\) what are the frequencies of the \(M\) alleles and the \(N\) alleles?

Price et al. (1999. J. Bacteriol. 181: 2358-2362) conducted a genetic study of the toxin transport protein (PA) of Bacillus anthracis, the bacterium that causes anthrax in humans. Within the 2294 -nucleotide gene in 26 strains they identified five point mutations-two missense and three synonyms-among different isolates. Necropsy samples from an anthrax outbreak in 1979 revealed a novel missense mutation and five unique nucleotide changes among ten victims. The authors concluded that these data indicate little or no horizontal transfer between different \(B\). anthracis strains. (a) Which types of nucleotide changes (missense or synonyms) cause amino acid changes? (b) What is meant by horizontal transfer? (c) On what basis did the authors conclude that evidence of horizontal transfer is absent from their data?

In a population of 10,000 individuals, where 3600 are \(M M\) 1600 are \(N N,\) and 4800 are \(M N,\) what are the frequencies of the \(M\) alleles and the \(N\) alleles?

Shown below are two homologous lengths of the alpha and beta chains of human hemoglobin. Consult a genetic code dictionary (Figure 13.7 ) and determine how many amino acid substitutions may have occurred as a result of a single nucleotide substitution. For any that cannot occur as a result of a single change, determine the minimal mutational distance.

In a population of cattle, the following color distribution was noted: \(36 \%\) red \((R R), 48 \%\) roan \((R r),\) and \(16 \%\) white \((r r) .\) Is this population in a Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium? What will be the distribution of genotypes in the next generation if the Hardy-Weinberg assumptions are met?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Biology Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free