A certain form of albinism in humans is recessive and autosomal. Assume that \(1 \%\) of the individuals in a given population are albino. Assuming that the population is in HardyWeinberg equilibrium, what percentage of the individuals in this population is expected to be heterozygous?

Short Answer

Expert verified
Answer: 18%

Step by step solution

01

Determine the frequency of the recessive allele (q)

Since 1% of individuals in the population are albino, we are given the frequency of homozygous recessive individuals (aa). Therefore, $$q^2 = 0.01$$. Now we will find the frequency of the recessive allele (q) by taking the square root of $$q^2$$: $$q = \sqrt{0.01} = 0.1$$
02

Determine the frequency of the dominant allele (p)

Now that we have the frequency of the recessive allele (q), we can find the frequency of the dominant allele (p). Since we know that p + q = 1, we can calculate p like this: $$p = 1 - q = 1 - 0.1 = 0.9$$
03

Calculate the frequency of heterozygous individuals (Aa)

Now that we have both p and q, we can use the Hardy-Weinberg equation to find the frequency of heterozygous individuals (Aa). This can be calculated using the term $$2pq$$: $$2pq = 2 * 0.9 * 0.1 = 0.18$$ This means that 18% of the individuals in the population are expected to be heterozygous.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The genetic difference between two Drosophila species, \(D\). heteroneura and \(D .\) sylvestris, as measured by nucleotide diversity, is about 1.8 percent. The difference between chimpanzees \((P\) troglodytes and humans (H. sapiens) is about the same, yet the latter species are classified in different genera. In your opinion, is this valid? Explain why.

The original source of new alleles, upon which selection operates, is mutation, a random event that occurs without regard to selectional value in the organism. Although many model organisms have been used to study mutational events in populations, some investigators have developed abiotic molecular models. Soll (2006) examined one such model to study the relationship between both deleterious and advantageous mutations and population size in a ligase molecule composed of RNA (a ribozyme). Soll found that the smaller the population of molecules, the more likely it was that not only deleterious mutations but also advantageous mutations would disappear. Why would population size influence the survival of both types of mutations (deleterious and advantageous) in populations?

A number of comparisons of nucleotide sequences among hominids and rodents indicate that inbreeding may have occurred more in hominid than in rodent ancestry. When an ancient population bottleneck leaving approximately 10,000 individuals occurred in humans, Knight (2005) and Bakewell (2007) both suggested that this event may have left early humans with a greater chance of genetic disease. Why would a population bottleneck influence the frequency of genetic disease?

Achondroplasia is a dominant trait that causes a characteristic form of dwarfism. In a survey of 50,000 births, five infants with achondroplasia were identified. Three of the affected infants had affected parents, while two had normal parents. Calculate the mutation rate for achondroplasia and express the rate as the number of mutant genes per given number of gametes.

Recent reconstructions of evolutionary history are often dependent on assigning divergence in terms of changes in amino acid or nucleotide sequences. For example, a comparison of cytochrome c shows 10 amino acid differences between humans and dogs, 24 differences between humans and moths, and 38 differences between humans and yeast. Such data provide no information as to the absolute times of divergence for humans, dogs, moths, and yeast. How might one calibrate the molecular clock to an absolute time clock? What problems might one encounter in such a calibration?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Biology Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free