A glycine residue is in position 210 of the tryptophan synthetase enzyme of wild-type \(E\). coli. If the codon specifying glycine is GGA, how many single- base substitutions will result in an amino acid substitution at position \(210 ?\) What are they? How many will result if the wild-type codon is GGU?

Short Answer

Expert verified
Answer: Three single-base substitutions will result in an amino acid substitution at position 210 for both the GGA and GGU codons specifying glycine.

Step by step solution

01

Understand the genetic code

To solve this problem, we need to understand how the genetic code is translated. The genetic code consists of 64 possible codons, which represent 20 amino acids and 3 stop codons. The codon is a group of three nucleotides (bases), and there are four types of nucleotide bases: adenine (A), guanine (G), cytosine (C), and uracil (U) in RNA or thymine (T) in DNA. In this problem, we are given the wild-type codon for glycine as GGA and GGU.
02

Analyzing single-base substitutions for GGA codon

We will look at all the possible single-base substitutions for the GGA codon and determine which ones will result in an amino acid substitution: 1. GAA: Glu (Glutamic acid) 2. GCA: Ala (Alanine) 3. GUA: Val (Valine) 4. GGA: Gly (Glycine) - no change 5. GGG: Gly (Glycine) - no change Out of the 5 possible single-base substitutions, two of them result in glycine, meaning 5 - 2 = 3 single-base substitutions will result in an amino acid substitution when the wild-type codon is GGA.
03

Analyzing single-base substitutions for GGU codon

We will now look at all the possible single-base substitutions for the GGU codon and determine which ones will result in an amino acid substitution: 1. GCU: Ala (Alanine) 2. GAU: Asp (Aspartic acid) 3. GGU: Gly (Glycine) - no change 4. GGG: Gly (Glycine) - no change 5. GUU: Val (Valine) Out of the 5 possible single-base substitutions, two of them result in glycine, so 5 - 2 = 3 single-base substitutions will result in an amino acid substitution when the wild-type codon is GGU.
04

Comparing the results

Upon analyzing the possible single-base substitutions for both GGA and GGU codons, we found that 3 single-base substitutions will result in an amino acid substitution at position 210 for both codons specifying glycine.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Decoding the Genetic Code
The genetic code is a foundational concept in molecular genetics, acting as the biological cipher that translates genetic information from the language of nucleic acids into the language of proteins. Imagine it as a dictionary where each 'word' or codon consists of three nucleotide bases—adenine (A), guanine (G), cytosine (C), and uracil (U) in RNA (or thymine [T] in DNA). There are 64 possible codons, each corresponding to specific amino acids or signaling the end of a protein chain (stop codons).

In our problem, the focus was on glycine specified by codons GGA and GGU. The exercise asked how many single-base changes in those codons would alter the amino acid at position 210 of the tryptophan synthetase enzyme. Through this exercise, students get an engaging demonstration of how single letters in the genetic 'text' can have significant effects on the resulting protein's structure and function.
Understanding Single-Base Substitutions
A single-base substitution is a type of genetic mutation where one base pair is improperly swapped for another. In the context of codons, this means changing one of the three bases, which can sometimes result in encoding a different amino acid—this is termed a 'missense' mutation. To assess the impact, each base in the given codon is systematically substituted with the remaining three nucleotide options, and the resulting codon's new assignment is compared to the original.

Our exercise demonstrated this process step by step, analyzing the specific genotype of an E. coli enzyme. Generally, single-base substitutions could result in no change (silent mutation), a different amino acid (missense mutation), or a stop signal (nonsense mutation) that prematurely terminates protein synthesis. The critical understanding here is that not all substitutions are consequential—a concept central to understanding genetic mutations and their potential impacts on organisms.
Exploring Amino Acid Substitution Consequences
When a single-base substitution alters the encoded amino acid, we term it an amino acid substitution. These can have mild to drastic effects on a protein's form and function. It's like changing one ingredient in a recipe; sometimes, the dish is unaffected, other times, it's inedible. In protein structures, such a substitution could simply alter a non-essential part or could disrupt the active site of an enzyme, as potentially investigated in our glycine residue example.

The solution indicated that out of five possible mutations for each codon, three would change the amino acid at position 210, leading students to comprehend that genetic stability and variability are finely balanced. By actively doing these exercises, students can recognize that the continuity of life hinges on the integrity and flexibility of genetic information—a thrilling revelation that adds depth to the study of biology.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

In this chapter, we focused on the genetic code and the transcription of genetic information stored in DNA into complementary RNA molecules. Along the way, we found many opportunities to consider the methods and reasoning by which much of this information was acquired. From the explana- tions given in the chapter, what answers would you propose to the following fundamental questions: (a) Why did geneticists believe, even before direct experimental evidence was obtained, that the genetic code would turn out to be composed of triplet sequences and be nonoverlapping? Experimentally, how were these suppositions shown to be correct? (b) What experimental evidence provided the initial insights into the compositions of codons encoding specific amino acids? (c) How were the specific sequences of triplet codes determined experimentally? (d) How were the experimentally derived triplet codon assignments verified in studies using bacteriophage MS2?

M. Klemke et al. (2001) discovered an interesting coding phenomenon in which an exon within a neurologic hormone receptor gene in mammals appears to produce two different protein entities (XLas and ALEX). Following is the DNA sequence of the exon's \(5^{\prime}\) end derived from a rat. \(5^{\prime}-g t c c c a a c c a t g c c c a c c g a t c t t c c g c c t g c t t c t g a a g A T G C G G G C C C A G\) The lowercase letters represent the initial coding portion for the XLas protein, and the uppercase letters indicate the portion where the ALEX entity is initiated. (For simplicity, and to correspond with the RNA coding dictionary, it is customary to represent the coding (non-template) strand of the DNA segment.) (a) Convert the coding DNA sequence to the coding RNA sequence. (b) Locate the initiator codon within the XLas segment. (c) Locate the initiator codon within the ALEX segment. Are the two initiator codons in frame? (d) Provide the amino acid sequence for each coding sequence. In the region of overlap, are the two amino acid sequences the same? (e) Are there any evolutionary advantages to having the same DNA sequence code for two protein products? Are there any disadvantages?

Define the process of transcription. Where does this process fit into the central dogma of molecular biology (DNA makes RNA makes protein)?

In studies of the amino acid sequence of wild-type and mutant forms of tryptophan synthetase in \(E .\) coli, the following changes have been observed: Determine a set of triplet codes in which only a single-nucleotide change produces each amino acid change.

It has been suggested that the present-day triplet genetic code evolved from a doublet code when there were fewer amino acids available for primitive protein synthesis. (a) Can you find any support for the doublet code notion in the existing coding dictionary? (b) The amino acids Ala, Val, Gly, Asp, and Glu are all early members of biosynthetic pathways and are more evolutionarily conserved than other amino acids. They therefore probably represent "early" amino acids. Of what significance is this information in terms of the evolution of the genetic code? Also, which base, of the first two within a coding triplet, would likely have been the more significant in originally specifying these amino acids? (c) As determined by comparisons of ancient and recently evolved proteins, cysteine, tyrosine, and phenylalanine appear to be latearriving amino acids. In addition, they are considered to have been absent in the abiotic Earth. All three of these amino acids have only two codons each, while many others, earlier in origin, have more. Is this mere coincidence, or might there be some underlying explanation?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Biology Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free