An early proposal by George Gamow in 1954 regarding the genetic code considered the possibility that DNA served directly as the template for polypeptide synthesis. In eukaryotes, what difficulties would such a system pose? What observations and theoretical considerations argue against such a proposal?

Short Answer

Expert verified
Answer: Gamow's proposal of direct DNA-to-polypeptide synthesis in eukaryotes is problematic because it does not account for the spatial separation of DNA and ribosomes, critical mRNA processing steps, and the complex regulation of gene expression in eukaryotes. Additionally, experimental evidence, the discovery of mRNA, and our understanding of ribosome structure argue against direct DNA-to-polypeptide synthesis.

Step by step solution

01

Understand DNA and polypeptide synthesis

DNA is a molecule that contains genetic information. It is transcribed into RNA (specifically, messenger RNA or mRNA), which is then translated into a chain of amino acids known as a polypeptide. Polypeptide chains fold into functional proteins. This general process is known as the central dogma of molecular biology and occurs in both prokaryotes and eukaryotes.
02

Identify the differences between eukaryotes and prokaryotes

Eukaryotes are organisms whose cells contain a nucleus and membrane-bound organelles. In contrast, prokaryotes lack a nucleus and membrane-bound organelles. The process of gene expression (transcription and translation) in eukaryotes is spatially separated by the nuclear membrane, while this separation does not exist in prokaryotes.
03

Analyze the proposal that DNA serves directly as the template

In Gamow's proposal, the DNA molecules would directly serve as the template for the formation of polypeptides, skipping the intermediate RNA step currently known as the central dogma of molecular biology. This would imply a direct interaction between DNA and ribosomes, the cellular structures where translation occurs.
04

Difficulties of direct DNA-to-polypeptide synthesis in eukaryotes

In eukaryotes, there are several reasons why direct DNA-to-polypeptide synthesis would pose difficulties: 1. Spatial separation: The DNA is located inside the nucleus, and the ribosomes are located in the cytoplasm. This would make direct interaction between DNA and ribosomes impossible. 2. mRNA modification: In eukaryotes, mRNA undergoes processing (e.g., the addition of a 5' cap, the removal of introns, and 3' polyadenylation) to become mature mRNA, which is then exported to the cytoplasm for translation. Direct DNA-to-polypeptide synthesis would not allow for these critical processing steps. 3. Regulation: The separation of transcription and translation in eukaryotes allows for more complex regulation of gene expression through the modification of mRNA and its stability.
05

Observations and theoretical considerations against Gamow's proposal

Several observations and theoretical considerations argue against the direct DNA-to-polypeptide synthesis proposed by Gamow: 1. Experimental evidence: Various experiments have shown that the central dogma of molecular biology holds true, with DNA being transcribed into RNA, which is then translated into polypeptides. 2. mRNA existence: The discovery of mRNA as the intermediary molecule between DNA and polypeptides further supports the central dogma concept and argues against direct DNA-to-polypeptide synthesis. 3. Ribosome structure: Ribosomes have been shown to contain both protein and ribosomal RNA (rRNA), which are critical for translation. This suggests that direct interaction between DNA and ribosomes would not be feasible. In conclusion, while Gamow's proposal was an interesting early concept in molecular biology, experimental evidence, the discovery of mRNA, and our current understanding of the eukaryotic cell's structure provide arguments against direct DNA-to-polypeptide synthesis in eukaryotes.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Central Dogma of Molecular Biology
The Central Dogma of Molecular Biology is the fundamental framework explaining how genetic information flows from DNA to RNA to proteins. It encapsulates the processes of transcription and translation, forming the cornerstone of modern genetics.

In transcription, the DNA sequence of a gene is copied into messenger RNA (mRNA). The transcription process ensures that the genetic information is transferred accurately from the stable, double-stranded DNA molecule to a more mobile single-stranded RNA copy.

Translation follows, where the mRNA serves as a template for protein synthesis. In this step, ribosomes read the mRNA sequence and, with the help of transfer RNA (tRNA), assemble the corresponding amino acids to form a polypeptide chain.

This dogma highlights the one-way flow of genetic information, with DNA at the top, as it is the storage of information, and proteins at the end, serving as the executors of genetic instructions.

Through this understanding, we can deduce why George Gamow's 1954 proposal, which omitted the role of mRNA, faced challenges when considering eukaryotic cells.
DNA-to-Polypeptide Synthesis
DNA-to-polypeptide synthesis is a sequence of events that begins with the genetic code embodied in the DNA and ends with the creation of polypeptide chains, which fold into functional proteins.

The first step involves transcription, where DNA acts as a template for mRNA. Next, translation occurs as the mRNA is decoded by ribosomes in the cytoplasm to synthesize polypeptides.

The sequence of nucleotides in the mRNA is read in sets of three, known as codons. Each codon specifies a particular amino acid, hence dictating the sequence of amino acids in the polypeptide.

This synthesis underpins how genetic instructions are executed, making it possible for cells to produce proteins which, in turn, are critical to countless cellular functions. Thus, the intermediate steps and the need for mRNA become clear justifications against Gamow's proposal, especially in the context of complex eukaryotic systems.
Eukaryotic Gene Expression
In eukaryotic organisms, gene expression involves a sophisticated set of processes that control the conversion of genetic information into functional products like proteins.

A defining feature of eukaryotic gene expression is the compartmentalization of transcription and translation. The nuclear envelope separates these two processes, with transcription taking place within the nucleus and translation occurring in the cytoplasm.

This spatial separation is crucial for the regulation of gene expression. It allows for additional levels of control, such as the processing and modification of mRNA, including capping, splicing, and polyadenylation, before it's exported to the cytoplasm.

Because of these complex regulatory mechanisms, the proposal of direct DNA-to-polypeptide synthesis, without the intermediate steps, is implausible in eukaryotic organisms, underscoring the importance of mRNA in the gene expression pathway.
mRNA Processing and Modification
Messenger RNA (mRNA) processing and modification are crucial steps in eukaryotic gene expression that enhance the stability and translatability of the mRNA molecules.

Once the initial mRNA (pre-mRNA) is synthesized from DNA, it undergoes several modifications:
  • The addition of a 5' cap, which protects mRNA from degradation and assists in ribosome binding for translation.
  • Splicing, where non-coding regions called introns are removed, and coding regions called exons are joined to produce a mature mRNA sequence capable of coding for proteins.
  • 3' polyadenylation, which involves adding a tail of adenine nucleotides that protects the mRNA and aids in the regulation of its lifespan within the cytoplasm.

These modifications are essential for creating a mature mRNA that can be effectively translated into a polypeptide. This complex processing pathway in eukaryotes argues against Gamow's simplified proposal of direct DNA-to-polypeptide synthesis.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

When the amino acid sequences of insulin isolated from different organisms were determined, differences were noted. For example, alanine was substituted for threonine, serine for glycine, and valine for isoleucine at corresponding positions in the protein. List the single-base changes that could occur in codons of the genetic code to produce these amino acid changes.

Write a paragraph describing the abbreviated chemical reactions that summarize RNA polymerase-directed transcription.

Isoginkgetin is a cell-permeable chemical isolated from the Ginkgo biloba tree that binds to and inhibits snRNPs. (a) What types of problems would you anticipate in cells treated with isoginkgetin? (b) Would this be most problematic for \(E\). coli cells, yeast cells, or human cells? Why?

Assuming the genetic code is a triplet, what effect would the addition or loss of two nucleotides have on the reading frame? The addition or loss of three, six, or nine nucleotides?

It has been suggested that the present-day triplet genetic code evolved from a doublet code when there were fewer amino acids available for primitive protein synthesis. (a) Can you find any support for the doublet code notion in the existing coding dictionary? (b) The amino acids Ala, Val, Gly, Asp, and Glu are all early members of biosynthetic pathways and are more evolutionarily conserved than other amino acids. They therefore probably represent "early" amino acids. Of what significance is this information in terms of the evolution of the genetic code? Also, which base, of the first two within a coding triplet, would likely have been the more significant in originally specifying these amino acids? (c) As determined by comparisons of ancient and recently evolved proteins, cysteine, tyrosine, and phenylalanine appear to be latearriving amino acids. In addition, they are considered to have been absent in the abiotic Earth. All three of these amino acids have only two codons each, while many others, earlier in origin, have more. Is this mere coincidence, or might there be some underlying explanation?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Biology Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free