Chapter 15: Problem 13
What is the major difference between the mechanism involved in attenuation and riboswitches and the mechanism involved in the regulation of the lactose operon?
Chapter 15: Problem 13
What is the major difference between the mechanism involved in attenuation and riboswitches and the mechanism involved in the regulation of the lactose operon?
All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.
Get started for freeA bacterial operon is responsible for the production of the biosynthetic enzymes needed to make the hypothetical amino acid tisophane (tis). The operon is regulated by a separate gene, \(R\) The deletion of \(R\) causes the loss of enzyme synthesis. In the wildtype condition, when tis is present, no enzymes are made; in the absence of tis, the enzymes are made. Mutations in the operator gene \(\left(O^{-}\right)\) result in repression regardless of the presence of tis. Is the operon under positive or negative control? Propose a model for (a) repression of the genes in the presence of tis in wild-type cells and (b) the mutations.
Describe the experimental rationale that allowed the lac repressor to be isolated.
Describe the role of attenuation in the regulation of tryptophan biosynthesis.
Contrast the role of the repressor in an inducible system and in a repressible system.
Erythritol is a natural sugar abundant in fruits and fermenting foods. Pathogenic bacterial strains that catabolize erythritol contain four closely spaced genes, all involved in erythritol metabolism. One of the four genes (eryD) encodes a product that represses the expression of the other three genes. Erythritol catabolism is stimulated by erythritol. Present a regulatory model to account for the regulation of erythritol catabolism in such bacterial strains. Does this system appear to be under inducible or repressible control?
What do you think about this solution?
We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.