Are there nucleotide substitutions that will not be detected by electrophoretic studies of a gene's protein product?

Short Answer

Expert verified
Explain your answer. Answer: Yes, there are nucleotide substitutions that will not be detected by electrophoretic studies of a gene's protein product. Synonymous substitutions, which do not change the amino acid sequence, will not be detected since the protein product is identical to the original. Additionally, non-synonymous substitutions that do not significantly alter the protein's size, charge, or shape might not be detected by electrophoresis.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding nucleotide substitutions

Nucleotide substitutions are changes in the DNA sequence where one nucleotide (A, T, C, or G) is replaced with another. There are two main types of nucleotide substitutions: synonymous (silent) and non-synonymous (missense) substitutions. Synonymous substitutions do not change the amino acid encoded by a codon, while non-synonymous substitutions change the amino acid encoded by a codon.
02

Understanding electrophoresis

Electrophoresis is a laboratory technique used to separate molecules, like proteins, based on their size, charge, or shape. In the context of studying a gene's protein product, electrophoresis is used to separate the protein of interest from other proteins in a sample. The separated proteins can be visualized as distinct bands on a gel, and their relative positions can provide information about the effects of nucleotide substitutions on the protein product.
03

Effects of nucleotide substitutions on electrophoresis

A nucleotide substitution can have different effects on the electrophoretic behavior of a protein depending on the type of substitution and the amino acid(s) involved: 1. Synonymous substitution: Since it does not change the amino acid sequence, the protein product is identical to the original, and it will have the same electrophoretic behavior. In this case, the nucleotide substitution will not be detected by electrophoretic studies of the protein product. 2. Non-synonymous substitution: The substitution changes the amino acid sequence of the protein and might alter its size, charge, or shape, which can potentially be detected by electrophoresis. However, if the amino acid change has minimal impact on the protein's electrophoretic behavior, the substitution might not be detected.
04

Conclusion

In conclusion, there are nucleotide substitutions that will not be detected by electrophoretic studies of a gene's protein product. Most notably, synonymous substitutions and non-synonymous substitutions that do not significantly alter the protein's size, charge, or shape will not be detected by electrophoretic studies.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Review the Chapter Concepts on page \(457 .\) All these pertain to the principles of population genetics and the evolution of species. Write a short essay describing the roles of mutation, migration, and selection in bringing about speciation.

Calculate the frequencies of the \(A A, A a,\) and \(a a\) genotypes after one generation if the initial population consists of \(0.2 \mathrm{AA}, 0.6\) \(A a,\) and 0.2 aa genotypes and meets the requirements of the Hardy-Weinberg relationship. What genotype frequencies will occur after a second generation?

What genetic changes take place during speciation?

List the barriers that prevent interbreeding and give an example of each.

A form of dwarfism known as Ellis-van Creveld syndrome was first discovered in the late 1930 s, when Richard Ellis and Simon van Creveld shared a train compartment on the way to a pediatrics meeting. In the course of conversation, they discovered that they each had a patient with this syndrome. They published a description of the syndrome in \(1940 .\) Affected individuals have a short-limbed form of dwarfism and often have defects of the lips and teeth, and polydactyly (extra fingers). The largest pedigree for the condition was reported in an Old Order Amish population in eastern Pennsylvania by Victor McKusick and his colleagues \((1964) .\) In that community, about 5 per 1000 births are affected, and in the population of \(8000,\) the observed frequency is 2 per \(1000 .\) All affected individuals have unaffected parents, and all affected cases can trace their ancestry to Samuel King and his wife, who arrived in the area in \(1774 .\) It is known that neither King nor his wife was affected with the disorder. There are no cases of the disorder in other Amish communities, such as those in Ohio or Indiana. (a) From the information provided, derive the most likely mode of inheritance of this disorder. Using the Hardy-Weinberg law, calculate the frequency of the mutant allele in the population and the frequency of heterozygotes, assuming Hardy-Weinberg conditions. (b) What is the most likely explanation for the high frequency of the disorder in the Pennsylvania Amish community and its absence in other Amish communities?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Biology Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free