The genetic difference between two Drosophila species, \(D\). heteroneura and \(D .\) sylvestris, as measured by nucleotide diversity, is about 1.8 percent. The difference between chimpanzees (P. troglodytes) and humans (H. sapiens) is about the same, yet the latter species are classified in different genera. In your opinion, is this valid? Explain why.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Explain your reasoning. Answer: Yes, it is valid to classify the primate species in different genera, despite having the same genetic difference as the Drosophila species. The primary reason is that genetic difference alone does not encompass the entirety of species differences. Factors such as morphology, reproductive compatibility, ecology, and evolutionary relationships also contribute to the classification of species, and these factors vary significantly between humans and chimpanzees. Therefore, their classification in different genera is justifiable.

Step by step solution

01

Define nucleotide diversity and genera

Nucleotide diversity is a measure of genetic variation between individuals within a population. It is calculated as the percentage of the nucleotide sites at which two randomly chosen DNA sequences from the population are expected to be different. Genera is a taxonomic category that is higher than species and lower than family. It groups together species that share common characteristics.
02

Discuss the factors considered while classifying species into different genera

The classification of species into different genera is based on numerous factors, which include: - Morphological similarities and differences: Physical traits, such as size, shape, and structure are compared. - Genetic similarities and differences: Genetic information is compared to reveal relationships between species. - Reproductive compatibility: Ability to interbreed and produce viable offspring is an important factor in classification. - Ecological similarities and differences: Species that share similar habitats, feeding habits, or other ecological factors may be grouped together. - Evolutionary relationships: Species with a common ancestor are likely to be in the same genera.
03

Compare these factors between the given species

While the genetic difference between the Drosophila species and the primate species is the same, other factors must be considered. - Morphology: Drosophila species are more morphologically similar to each other than chimpanzees and humans. Primates have distinct features, such as larger brains and specialized limbs for locomotion. - Reproductive compatibility: Humans and chimpanzees cannot interbreed and produce viable offspring, whereas Drosophila species may be more likely to do so. - Ecology: Chimpanzees and humans occupy different ecological niches and have varying social structures, whereas the Drosophila species may share more similar habits. - Evolutionary relationships: Chimpanzees and humans have a more distant common ancestor as compared to the Drosophila species.
04

Form a conclusion and express our opinion on the validity of classifying the primate species in different genera

Considering the factors mentioned above, it is valid to classify chimpanzees and humans in different genera, despite having the same genetic difference as the Drosophila species. The primary reason is that the genetic difference does not encompass the entirety of species differences. Morphology, reproductive compatibility, ecology, and evolutionary relationships also contribute to the classification of species. Since these factors vary significantly between humans and chimpanzees, their classification in different genera is justifiable.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Consider rare disorders in a population caused by an autosomal recessive mutation. From the frequencies of the disorder in the population given, calculate the percentage of heterozygous carriers. (a) 0.0064 (b) 0.000081 (c) 0.09 (d) 0.01 (e) 0.10

A form of dwarfism known as Ellis-van Creveld syndrome was first discovered in the late 1930 s, when Richard Ellis and Simon van Creveld shared a train compartment on the way to a pediatrics meeting. In the course of conversation, they discovered that they each had a patient with this syndrome. They published a description of the syndrome in \(1940 .\) Affected individuals have a short-limbed form of dwarfism and often have defects of the lips and teeth, and polydactyly (extra fingers). The largest pedigree for the condition was reported in an Old Order Amish population in eastern Pennsylvania by Victor McKusick and his colleagues \((1964) .\) In that community, about 5 per 1000 births are affected, and in the population of \(8000,\) the observed frequency is 2 per \(1000 .\) All affected individuals have unaffected parents, and all affected cases can trace their ancestry to Samuel King and his wife, who arrived in the area in \(1774 .\) It is known that neither King nor his wife was affected with the disorder. There are no cases of the disorder in other Amish communities, such as those in Ohio or Indiana. (a) From the information provided, derive the most likely mode of inheritance of this disorder. Using the Hardy-Weinberg law, calculate the frequency of the mutant allele in the population and the frequency of heterozygotes, assuming Hardy-Weinberg conditions. (b) What is the most likely explanation for the high frequency of the disorder in the Pennsylvania Amish community and its absence in other Amish communities?

Population geneticists study changes in the nature and amount of genetic variation in populations, the distribution of different genotypes, and how forces such as selection and drift act on genetic variation to bring about evolutionary change in populations and the formation of new species. From the explanation given in the chapter, what answers would you propose to the following fundamental questions? (a) How do we know how much genetic variation is in a population? (b) How do geneticists detect the presence of genetic variation as different alleles in a population? (c) How do we know whether the genetic structure of a population is static or dynamic? (d) How do we know when populations have diverged to the point that they form two different species? (e) How do we know the age of the last common ancestor shared by two species?

Review the Chapter Concepts on page \(457 .\) All these pertain to the principles of population genetics and the evolution of species. Write a short essay describing the roles of mutation, migration, and selection in bringing about speciation.

What genetic changes take place during speciation?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Biology Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free