Why were the Federalists concerned that including a Bill of Rights in the Constitution would limit rather than protect individual freedoms? Do you agree or disagree? Explain your answer.

Explain your reasoning. Answer: I disagree with the Federalists' concerns about the inclusion of a Bill of Rights in the Constitution. Although their concern about limiting individual liberties not explicitly mentioned is valid, the Bill of Rights provides essential protections for citizens and a clear list of rights, empowering individuals against potential governmental abuses. The benefits of including a Bill of Rights, such as ensuring freedom of speech, religion, and press, the right to a fair trial, and protection against cruel and unusual punishment, outweigh the potential risks. Furthermore, the Constitution can be amended over time to address new concerns and protect additional rights, as history has shown, providing flexibility to adapt to changing societal values and needs.