Question: The management of Mitchell Labs decided to go private in 2002 by buying in all 2.80 million of its outstanding shares at \(24.80 per share. By 2006, management had restructured the company by selling off the petroleum research division for \)10.75 million, the fiber technology division for \(8.45 million, and the synthetic products division for \)20 million. Because these divisions had been only marginally profitable, Mitchell Labs is a stronger company after the restructuring. Mitchell is now able to concentrate exclusively on contract research and will generate earnings per share of $1.10 this year. Investment bankers have contacted the firm and indicated that if it re-entered the public market, the 2.80 million shares it purchased to go private could now be reissued to the public at a P/E ratio of 15 times earnings per share.

c. What is the percentage return to the management of Mitchell Labs from the restructuring? Use answers from parts a and b to determine this value

Short Answer

Expert verified

The percentage return to management is 22.98%.

Step by step solution

01

Information available

Shares outstanding = 2,800,000

Buy-back price of shares = $24.80 shares

Proceeds from sale of petroleum division = $10,750,000

Proceeds from sale of fiber technology division = 8,450,000

Proceeds from sale of synthetic product division = $20,000,000

Expected earnings per share = $1.10 per share

PE ratio = 15 times

Initial cost = $69,440,000

Cost of restructuring = $85,400,000

02

Calculation of profit from restructuring

The profit from restructuring is $15,960,000.

Profit from restructuring=Total value of company-Initial cost=$85,400,000-$69,440,000=$15,960,000

03

Calculation of percentage return to management

The percentage return to management is 22.98%.

Percentage return=Profit from restructuringInitial cost×100=$15,960,000$69,440,000×100=22.98%

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Question: Barton Simpson, the chief financial officer of Broadband Inc. could hardly believe the change in interest rates that had taken place over the last few months. The interest rate on A2 rated bonds was now 6 percent. The $30 million, 15-year bond issue that his firm has outstanding was initially issued at 9 percent five years ago. Because interest rates had gone down so much, he was considering refunding the bond issue. The old issue had a call premium of 8 percent. The underwriting cost on the old issue had been 3 percent of par, and on the new issue it would be 5 percent of par. The tax rate would be 30 percent and a 4 percent discount rate would be applied for the refunding decision. The new bond would have a 10-year life. Before Barton used the 8 percent call provision to reacquire the old bonds, he wanted to make sure he could not buy them back cheaper in the open market.

c. Now do the standard bond refunding analysis as discussed in this chapter. Is the refunding financially feasible?

The Ellis Corporation has heavy lease commitments. Prior to SFAS No. 13, it merely footnoted lease obligations in the balance sheet, which appeared as follows:

In \( millions

In \) millions

Current assets

\(70

Current liabilities

\)30

Fixed assets

\(70

Long-term liabilities

\)30

Total liabilities

\(60

Stockholder’s equity

\)80

Total assets

\(140

Total stockholder’s equity and liabilities

\)140

The footnotes stated that the company had $14 million in annual capital lease obligations for the next 20 years.

f. Comment on management’s perception of market efficiency (the viewpoint of the financial officer).

How would you define efficient security markets?

Kevin’s Bacon Company Inc. has earnings of \(9 million with 2,100,000 shares outstanding before a public distribution. Seven hundred thousand shares will be included in the sale, of which 400,000 are new corporate shares, and 300,000 are shares currently owned by Ann Fry, the founder and CEO. The 300,000 shares that Ann is selling are referred to as a secondary offering, and all proceeds will go to her.

The net price from the offering will be \)16.50, and the corporate proceeds are expected to produce $1.8 million in corporate earnings.

a. What were the corporation’s earnings per share before the offering?

b. What are the corporation’s earnings per share expected to be after the offering?

How does the bond rating affect the interest rate paid by a corporation on its bonds?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Business Studies Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free