Why is it said that convertible securities have a floor price?

Short Answer

Expert verified

Answer

The floor value of the convertible securities is the lowest value to which the bond can reduce and the point at which the conversion option becomes useless.

Step by step solution

01

Introduction to convertible security-

Convertible security is a security generally a bond or a preferred stock that can be converted into an alternate security normally equity shares or common stock.

02

Convertible securities have a floor price

The floor price of a convertible securities depends on the pure bond value related with the interest payments on the bond. Notwithstanding of how low the related common stock could go; the semi-yearly interest payments will set a floor price for the bond. It's vital to know how to compute the value so that can be convert the bonds while they still hold value.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Tiger Golf Supplies has $25 million in earnings with 7 million shares outstanding. Its investment banker thinks the stock should trade at a P/E ratio of 31. Assume there is an underwriting spread of 7.8 percent. What should the price to the public be?

Solar Energy Corp. has $4million in earnings with 4 million shares outstanding. Investment bankers think the stock can justify P/E ratio of 21. Assume the underwriting spread is 5 percent. What should the price to the public be?

The trustee in the bankruptcy settlement for Titanic Boat Co. lists the following book values and liquidation values for the assets of the corporation. Liabilities and stockholders’ claims are also shown.

Assets

Book value

Liquidation value

Accounts receivables

\(1,400,000

\)1,200,000

Inventory

\(1,800,000

\)900,000

Machinery and equipment

\(1,100,000

\)600,000

Building and plant

\(4,200,000

\)2,500,000

Total assets

\(8,500,000

\)5,200,000

Liabilities and stockholder’s claims

Liabilities

Accounts payable

\(2,800,000

First lien, secured by machinery and equipment

\)900,000

Senior unsecured debt

\(2,200,000

Subordinated debenture

\)1,700,000

Total liabilities

\(7,600,000

Stockholder’s claims

Preferred stock

\)250,000

Common stock

\(650,000

Total stockholder’s claims

\)900,000

Total liabilities and stockholder’s claims

$8,500,000

h. Show the relationship of amount received to total amount of claim in a similar fashion to that of Table 16A-5. Remember to use the sales (liquidation) value for machinery and equipment plus the allocation amount in part g to arrive at the total received on secured debt.

The Ellis Corporation has heavy lease commitments. Prior to SFAS No. 13, it merely footnoted lease obligations in the balance sheet, which appeared as follows:

In \( millions

In \) millions

Current assets

\(70

Current liabilities

\)30

Fixed assets

\(70

Long-term liabilities

\)30

Total liabilities

\(60

Stockholder’s equity

\)80

Total assets

\(140

Total stockholder’s equity and liabilities

\)140

The footnotes stated that the company had $14 million in annual capital lease obligations for the next 20 years.

e. In an efficient capital market environment, should the consequences of SFAS No. 13, as viewed in the answers to parts c and d, change stock prices and credit ratings?

Question: Barton Simpson, the chief financial officer of Broadband Inc. could hardly believe the change in interest rates that had taken place over the last few months. The interest rate on A2 rated bonds was now 6 percent. The $30 million, 15-year bond issue that his firm has outstanding was initially issued at 9 percent five years ago. Because interest rates had gone down so much, he was considering refunding the bond issue. The old issue had a call premium of 8 percent. The underwriting cost on the old issue had been 3 percent of par, and on the new issue it would be 5 percent of par. The tax rate would be 30 percent and a 4 percent discount rate would be applied for the refunding decision. The new bond would have a 10-year life. Before Barton used the 8 percent call provision to reacquire the old bonds, he wanted to make sure he could not buy them back cheaper in the open market.

b. Compare the price in part a to the 8 percent call premium over par value. Which appears to be more attractive in terms of reacquiring the old bonds?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Business Studies Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free