Which of the following is false?

(a) GAAP and IFRS have the same absolute standard regarding the reporting of error corrections in previously issued financial statements.

(b) The accounting for changes in estimates is similar between GAAP and IFRS.

(c) Under IFRS, the impracticability exception applies both to changes in accounting principles and to the correction of errors.

(d) GAAP has detailed guidance on the accounting and reporting of indirect effects; IFRS does not.

Short Answer

Expert verified

Option (a) is false as GAAP and IFRS differ in reporting the error correction.

Step by step solution

01

False Statement

The False statement is option A.

02

Explanation for false statement

The statement in option A is false because both GAAP and IFRS differ in reporting the correction of the error in the previously issued financial statement of the business.

03

Explanation for other options

Statement B is true because GAAP and IFRS do have similar treatment for changes in accounting estimates.

Statement C is true, as according to IFRS, the impracticality exception applies to changes in accounting principles and correction of errors

Statement D is true as IFRS does not detail guidance on reporting the indirect effect as GAAP.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

You have been assigned to examine the financial statements of Zarle Company for the year ended December 31, 2017. You discover the following situations.

1. Depreciation of \(3,200 for 2017 on delivery vehicles was not recorded.

2. The physical inventory count on December 31, 2016, improperly excluded merchandise costing \)19,000 that had been temporarily stored in a public warehouse. Zarle uses a periodic inventory system.

3. A collection of \(5,600 on account from a customer received on December 31, 2017, was not recorded until January 2, 2018.

4. In 2017, the company sold for \)3,700 fully depreciated equipment that originally cost \(25,000. The company credited the proceeds from the sale to the Equipment account.

5. During November 2017, a competitor company filed a patent-infringement suit against Zarle claiming damages of \)220,000. The company’s legal counsel has indicated that an unfavorable verdict is probable and a reasonable estimate of the court’s award to the competitor is \(125,000. The company has not reflected or disclosed this situation in the financial statements.

6. Zarle has a portfolio of trading investments. No entry has been made to adjust to market. Information on cost and fair value is as follows. Cost Fair Value December 31, 2016 \)95,000 \(95,000 December 31, 2017 \)84,000 \(82,000

7. At December 31, 2017, an analysis of payroll information shows accrued salaries of \)12,200. The Salaries and Wages Payable account had a balance of \(16,000 at December 31, 2017, which was unchanged from its balance at December 31, 2016.

8. A large piece of equipment was purchased on January 3, 2017, for \)40,000 and was charged to Maintenance and Repairs Expense. The equipment is estimated to have a service life of 8 years and no residual value. Zarle normally uses the straight-line depreciation method for this type of equipment.

9. A \(12,000 insurance premium paid on July 1, 2016, for a policy that expires on June 30, 2019, was charged to insurance expense.

10. A trademark was acquired at the beginning of 2016 for \)50,000. No amortization has been recorded since its acquisition. The maximum allowable amortization period is 10 years.

Instructions

Assume the trial balance has been prepared but the books have not been closed for 2017. Assuming all amounts are material, prepare journal entries showing the adjustments that are required. (Ignore income tax considerations.)

On January 1, 2017, Millay Inc. paid \(700,000 for 10,000 shares of Genso Company’s voting common stock, which was a 10% interest in Genso. At that date, the net assets of Gensototaled \)6,000,000. The fair values of all of Genso’s identifiable assets and liabilities were equal to their book values. Millay does not have the ability to exercise significant influence over the operating and financial policies of Genso. Millay received dividends of \(1.50 per share from Genso on October 1, 2017. Genso reported net income of \)550,000 for the year ended December 31, 2017.

On July 1, 2018, Millay paid \(2,325,000 for 30,000 additional shares of Genso Company’s voting common stock which represents a 30% investment in Genso. The fair values of all of Genso’s identifiable assets net of liabilities were equal to their book values of \)6,550,000. As a result of this transaction, Millay has the ability to exercise significant influence over the operating and financial policies of Genso. Millay received dividends of \(2.00 per share from Genso on April 1, 2018, and \)2.50 per share on October 1, 2018. Genso reported net income of \(650,000 for the year ended December 31, 2018, and \)350,000 for the 6 months ended December 31, 2018.

Instructions (For both purchases, assume any excess of cost over book value is due to goodwill.)

(a) Prepare a schedule showing the income or loss before income taxes for the year ended December 31, 2017, that Millay should report from its investment in Genso in its income statement issued in March 2018.

(b) During March 2019, Millay issues comparative financial statements for 2017 and 2018. Prepare schedules showing the income or loss before income taxes for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2018, that Millay should report from its investment in Genso.

How should consolidated financial statements be reported this year when statements of individual companies were presented last year?

If a company registered with the SEC justifies a change in accounting method as preferable under the circumstances, and the circumstances change, can that company switch back to its prior method of accounting before the change? Why or why not?

What is the indirect effect of a change in accounting policy? Briefly describe the approach to reporting the indirect effects of a change in accounting policy under IFRS.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Business Studies Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free