Presented below are income statements prepared on a LIFO and FIFO basis for Kenseth Company, which started operations on January 1, 2016. The company presently uses the LIFO method of pricing its inventory and has decided to switch to the FIFO method in 2017. The FIFO income statement is computed in accordance with the requirements of GAAP. Kenseth’s profit-sharing agreement with its employees indicates that the company will pay employees 10% of income before profit-sharing. Income taxes are ignored. LIFO Basis FIFO Basis 2017 2016 2017 2016 Sales \(3,000 \)3,000 \(3,000 \)3,000 Cost of goods sold 1,130 1,000 1,100 940 Operating expenses 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 Income before profi t-sharing 870 1,000 900 1,060 Profi t-sharing expense 87 100 96 100 Net income \( 783 \) 900 \( 804 \) 960 Instructions Answer the following questions. (a) If comparative income statements are prepared, what net income should Kenseth report in 2016 and 2017? (b) Explain why, under the FIFO basis, Kenseth reports \(100 in 2016 and \)96 in 2017 for its profit-sharing expense. (c) Assume that Kenseth has a beginning balance of retained earnings at January 1, 2017, of \(900 using the LIFO method. The company declared and paid dividends of \)500 in 2017. Prepare the -retained earnings statement for 2017, assuming that Kenseth has switched to the FIFO method.

Short Answer

Expert verified

The net income of 2017 is $804, 2016 is $960, and closing retained earnings is $1,264. The amounts are recorded as $96 and $100 because of the indirect effect.

Step by step solution

01

Comparative Income Statement

2017 ($)

2016 ($)

Sales

3,000

3,000

Cost of goods sold

1,100

940

Operating expenses

1,000

1,000

Income before profit sharing

900

1,060

Profit-sharing Expenses

96

100

Net Income

804

960

02

Explanation of the amounts

This is the indirect effect, as this happened in the period before the change. The profit-sharing expenses were recorded as $96 and $100 in 2017.

03

Retained Earnings Statement

2017 ($)

Retained earnings, Jan 1 as reported

900

Cumulative Effect change to FIFO

60

Retained Earnings, Jan 1 as adjusted

960

Add: Net Income

804

Less: Dividends

-500

Retained Earnings, Dec 31

1,264

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Lenexa State Bank has followed the practice of capitalizing certain marketing costs and amortizing these costs over their expected life. In the current year, the bank determined that the future benefits from these costs were doubtful. Consequently, the bank adopted the policy of expensing these costs as incurred. How should the bank report this accounting change in the comparative financial statements?

(Change in Principle—Long-Term Contracts) Cullen Construction Company, which began operations in 2017, changed from the completed-contract to the percentage-of-completion method of accounting for long-term construction contracts during 2018. For tax purposes, the company employs the completed-contract method and will continue this approach in the future. The appropriate information related to this change is as follows.

Pretax Income Percentage-of-Completion Completed-Contract Difference 2017 \(880,000 \)590,000 $290,000 2018 900,000 480,000 420,000

Instructions (a) Assuming that the tax rate is 40%, what is the amount of net income that would be reported in 2018? (b) What entry(ies) are necessary to adjust the accounting records for the change in accounting principle?

As part of the year-end accounting process and review of operating policies, Cullen Co. is considering a change in the accounting for its equipment from the straight-line method to an accelerated method. Your supervisor wonders how the company will report this change in principle. He read in a newspaper article that the FASB has issued a standard in this area and has changed GAAP for a “change in estimate that is effected by a change in accounting principle.” (Thus, the accounting may be different from what he learned in intermediate accounting.) Your supervisor wants you to research the authoritative guidance on a change in accounting principle related to depreciation methods.

Instructions

(a) What are the accounting and reporting guidelines for a change in accounting principle related to depreciation methods?

(b) What are the conditions that justify a change in depreciation method, as contemplated by Cullen Co.?

(c) What guidance does the SEC provide concerning the impact that recently issued accounting standards will have on the financial statements in a future period?

On December 31, 2017, before the books were closed, the management and accountants of Madrasa Inc. made the following determinations about three pieces of equipment.

1. Equipment A was purchased January 2, 2014. It originally cost \(540,000 and, for depreciation purposes, the straight-line method was originally chosen. The asset was originally expected to be useful for 10 years and have a zero salvage value. In 2017, the decision was made to change the depreciation method from straight-line to sum-of-the-years’-digits, and the estimates relating to useful life and salvage value remained unchanged.

2. Equipment B was purchased January 3, 2013. It originally cost \)180,000 and, for depreciation purposes, the straight-line method was chosen. The asset was originally expected to be useful for 15 years and have a zero residual value. In 2017, the decision was made to shorten the total life of this asset to 9 years and to estimate the residual value at \(3,000.

3. Equipment C was purchased January 5, 2013. The asset’s original cost was \)160,000, and this amount was entirely expensed in 2013. This particular asset has a 10-year useful life and no residual value. The straight-line method was chosen for depreciation purposes.

Additional data:

1. Income in 2017 before depreciation expense amounted to \(400,000.

2. Depreciation expense on assets other than A, B, and C totaled \)55,000 in 2017.

3. Income in 2016 was reported at \(370,000.

4. Ignore all income tax effects.

5. 100,000 shares of common stock were outstanding in 2016 and 2017.

Instructions

(a) Prepare all necessary entries in 2017 to record these determinations.

(b) Prepare comparative retained earnings statements for Madrasa Inc. for 2016 and 2017. The company had retained earnings of \)200,000 at December 31, 2015.

Define a change in estimate and provide an illustration. When is a change in accounting estimate effected by a change in accounting principle?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Business Studies Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free