Presented below are the comparative income and retained earnings statements for Denise Habbe Inc. for the years 2017 and 2018.

2018 2017 Sales \(340,000 \)270,000 Cost of sales 200,000 142,000 Gross profit 140,000 128,000 Expenses 88,000 50,000 Net income \( 52,000 \) 78,000 Retained earnings (Jan. 1) \(125,000 \) 72,000 Net income 52,000 78,000 Dividends (30,000) (25,000) Retained earnings (Dec. 31) \(147,000 \)125,000

The following additional information is provided: 1. In 2018, Denise Habbe Inc. decided to switch its depreciation method from sum-of-the-years’ digits to the straight-line method. The assets were purchased at the beginning of 2017 for \(100,000 with an estimated useful life of 4 years and no salvage value. (The 2018 income statement contains depreciation expense of \)30,000 on the assets purchased at the beginning of 2017.) 2. In 2018, the company discovered that the ending inventory for 2017 was overstated by $24,000; ending inventory for 2018 is correctly stated.

Instructions Prepare the revised retained earnings statement for 2017 and 2018, assuming comparative statements. (Ignore income taxes.)

Short Answer

Expert verified

The Closing balance of retained earnings for 2018 is $167,000 and for 2017 is $101,000.

Step by step solution

01

Comparative Income statement

2018 ($)

2017 ($)

Sales

340,000

270,000

Cost of sales

176,000

166,000

Gross profit

164,000

104,000

Expenses

83,000

50,000

Income before cumulative effect of a Change

81,000

5,400

Cumulative effect on prior years

15,000

Net Income

96,000

54,000

02

Statement of retained earnings

Comparative retained earnings statement:

2018 ($)

2017 ($)

Retained earnings, Jan 1

101,000

72,000

Net income

96,000

54,000

Dividends

-30,000

-25,000

Retained Earnings, Dec 31

167,000

101,000

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Kathleen Cole Inc. acquired the following assets in January of 2015.

Equipment, estimated service life, 5 years; salvage value, \(15,000 \)525,000

Building, estimated service life, 30 years; no salvage value $693,000

The equipment has been depreciated using the sum-of-the-years’-digits method for the first 3 years for financial reporting purposes. In 2018, the company decided to change the method of computing depreciation to the straight-line method for the equipment, but no change was made in the estimated service life or salvage value. It was also decided to change the total estimated service life of the building from 30 years to 40 years, with no change in the estimated salvage value. The building is depreciated on the straight-line method.

Instructions (a) Prepare the general journal entry to record depreciation expenses for the equipment in 2018.

(b) Prepare the journal entry to record depreciation expenses for the building in 2018. (Round all computations to two decimal places.)

State how each of the following items is reflected in the financial statements. (a) Change from FIFO to LIFO method for inventory valuation purposes. (b) Charge for failure to record depreciation in a previous period. (c) Litigation won in current year, related to prior period. (d) Change in the realizability of certain receivables. (e) Write-off of receivables. (f) Change from the percentage-of-completion to the completed-contract method for reporting net income.

Access the glossary (“Master Glossary”) to answer the following.

(a) What is a change in accounting estimate?

(b) What is a change in accounting principle?

(c) What is a restatement?

(d) What is the definition of “retrospective application”?

(Error Analysis) When the records of Debra Hanson Corporation were reviewed at the close of 2018, the following errors were discovered. For each item, indicate by a check mark in the appropriate column whether the error resulted in an overstatement, an understatement, or had no effect on net income for the years 2017 and 2018.

2017 2018 Over- Under- No Over- Under- No Item statement statement Effect statement statement Effect

1. Failure to record amortization of patent in 2018.

2. Failure to record the correct amount of ending 2017 inventory. The amount was understated because of an error in calculation.

3. Failure to record merchandise purchased in 2017. Merchandise was also omitted from ending inventory in 2017 but was not yet sold.

4. Failure to record accrued interest on notes payable in 2017; that amount was recorded when paid in 2018.

5. Failure to reflect supplies on hand on the balance sheet at end of 2017.

Under IFRS, the retrospective approach should not be used if:

(a) retrospective application requires assumptions about management’s intent in a prior period.

(b) the company does not have trained staff to perform the analysis.

(c) the effects of the change have counterbalanced.

(d) the effects of the change have not counterbalanced.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Business Studies Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free