Log out Go to App
Go to App

Learning Materials

Features

Discover

Chapter 7: Question: E7-10 (page 366)

(Bad-Debt Reporting) The chief accountant for Dickinson Corporation provides you with the following list of accounts receivable written off in the current year.

Date

Customer

Amount \(

March 31

E.L Masters Company

\)7,800

June 30

Stephen Crane Associates

6,700

September 30

Amy Lowell’s Dress Shop

7,000

December 31

R. Frost. Inc

9,830

Dickinson follows the policy of debiting Bad Debt Expense as accounts are written off. The chief accountant maintains that this procedure is appropriate for financial statement purposes because the Internal Revenue Service will not accept other methods for recognizing bad debts.

All of Dickinson’s sales are on a 30-day credit basis. Sales for the current year total \(2,200,000. The balance in Accounts Receivable at year-end is \)77,000 and an analysis of customer risk and charge-off experience indicates that 12% of receivables will be uncollectible (assume a zero balance in the allowance).

Instructions

(a) Do you agree or disagree with Dickinson’s policy concerning recognition of bad debt expense? Why or why not?

(b) By what amount would net income differ if bad debt expense was computed using the percentage-of-receivables approach?

Short Answer

Expert verified

Net income under the percentage method of calculating bad debt will be higher by$22,090.

Step by step solution

01

Definition of Direct Write Off Method

The method of reporting uncollectible amount under which a business entity directly debits bad debt expenses and credit accounts receivables is known as direct write-off method.

02

Justification of method used

Direct write-off method is not theoretically correct because it does not follow the matching principle of accounting. It does not report the accounts receivables in their net realizable value. Therefore, a business entity must not adopt direct write-off method.

03

Difference in net income when percentage method is used

Particular

Amount $

Direct write off method$7,800+$6,700+$7,000+$9,830

$31,330

Less: Percentage of receivables $77,000×12%

($9,240)

Difference in net income

$22,090

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Start your free trial

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Restin Co. uses the gross method to record sales made on credit. On June 1, 2017, it made sales of $50,000 with terms 3/15, n/45. On June 12, 2017, Restin received full payment for the June 1 sale. Prepare the required journal entries for Restin Co.

What is the fair value option? Where do companies that elect the fair value option report unrealized holding gains and losses?

(Accounting for Zero-Interest-Bearing Note) Soon after beginning the year-end audit work on March 10 at Engone Company, the auditor has the following conversation with the controller.

Controller: The year ended March 31st should be our most profitable in history and, as a consequence, the board of directors has just awarded the officers generous bonuses.

Auditor: I thought profits were down this year in the industry, according to your latest interim report.

Controller: Well, they were down, but 10 days ago we closed a deal that will give us a substantial increase for the year.

Auditor: Oh, what was it?

Controller: Well, you remember a few years ago our former president bought stock in Henderson Enterprises because he had those grandiose ideas about becoming a conglomerate. For 6 years we have not been able to sell this stock, which cost us \(3,000,000 and has not paid a nickel in dividends. Thursday we sold this stock to Bimini Inc. for \)4,000,000. So, we will have a gain of \(700,000 (\)1,000,000 pretax) which will increase our net income for the year to \(4,000,000, compared with last year’s \)3,800,000. As far as I know, we’ll be the only company in the industry to register an increase in net income this year. That should help the market value of the stock!

Auditor: Do you expect to receive the \(4,000,000 in cash by March 31st, your fiscal year-end?

Controller: No. Although Bimini Inc. is an excellent company, they are a little tight for cash because of their rapid growth. Consequently, they are going to give us a \)4,000,000 zero-interest-bearing note with payments of $400,000 per year for the next 10 years. The first payment is due on March 31 of next year.

Auditor: Why is the note zero-interest-bearing?

Controller: Because that’s what everybody agreed to. Since we don’t have any interest-bearing debt, the funds invested in the note do not cost us anything and besides, we were not getting any dividends on the Henderson Enterprises stock.

Instructions

Do you agree with the way the controller has accounted for the transaction? If not, how should the transaction be accounted for?

(Analysis of Receivables) Presented below is information for Jones Company.

1. Beginning-of-the-year Accounts Receivable balance was \(15,000.

2. Net sales (all on account) for the year were \)100,000. Jones does not offer cash discounts.

3. Collections on accounts receivable during the year were $70,000.

Instructions

(a) Prepare (summary) journal entries to record the items noted above.

(b) Compute Jones’s accounts receivable turnover and days to collect receivables for the year. The company does not believe it will have any bad debts.

(c) Use the turnover ratio computed in (b) to analyze Jones’s liquidity. The turnover ratio last year was 6.0

(Notes Receivable with Unrealistic Interest Rate) On December 31, 2015, Ed Abbey Co. performed environmental consulting services for Hayduke Co. Hayduke was short of cash, and Abbey Co. agreed to accept a $200,000 zero-interest-bearing note due December 31, 2017, as payment in full. Hayduke is somewhat of a credit risk and typically borrows funds at a rate of 10%. Abbey is much more creditworthy and has various lines of credit at 6%.

Instructions

(a) Prepare the journal entry to record the transaction of December 31, 2015, for the Ed Abbey Co.

(b) Assuming Ed Abbey Co.’s fiscal year-end is December 31, prepare the journal entry for December 31, 2016.

(c) Assuming Ed Abbey Co.’s fiscal year-end is December 31, prepare the journal entry for December 31, 2017.
See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Business Studies Textbooks

Change Management

Read Explanation

Business Operations

Read Explanation

Organizational Communication

Read Explanation

Introduction to Business

Read Explanation

Business Development

Read Explanation

Strategic Analysis

Read Explanation
View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free