Chapter 7: Question IFRS7-1 (page 385)

What are some steps taken by both the FASB and IASB to move to fair value measurement for financial instruments? In what ways have some of the approaches differed?

Short Answer

Expert verified

Thesplit model is introduced for stating business entities to report financial instruments at their fair value. There is a difference between recording the impairment losses and gains under IASB and FASB.

Step by step solution

01

Definition of IASB

The board responsible for developing the regulations in international financial statement reporting is IASB (International Accounting Standard Board).

02

Steps Taken by FASB and IASB for Fair Value Measurement

Both IASB and FASB state that the financial instruments must be recorded on their fair value because it increases the financial statements' understandability and transparency. All other financial assets must be reported at their amortized cost when the financial asset meets some specified criteria.

03

Difference in Approaches

The difference that exists between the approaches of IASB and FASB is the accounting for impairment of the financial instruments. Under the IASB approach, the allowance is estimated for a shorter future than FASB.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Presented below are a number of independent situations.

Instructions

For each individual situation, determine the amount that should be reported as cash. If the item(s) is not reported as cash, explain the rationale.

1. Checking account balance \(925,000; certificate of deposit \)1,400,000; cash advance to subsidiary of \(980,000; utility deposit paid to gas company \)180.

2. Checking account balance \(600,000; an overdraft in special checking account at same bank as normal checking account of \)17,000; cash held in a bond sinking fund \(200,000; petty cash fund \)300; coins and currency on hand \(1,350.

3. Checking account balance \)590,000; postdated check from customer \(11,000; cash restricted due to maintaining compensating balance requirement of \)100,000; certified check from customer \(9,800; postage stamps on hand \)620.

4. Checking account balance at bank \(37,000; money market balance at mutual fund (has checking privileges) \)48,000; NSF check received from customer \(800.

5. Checking account balance \)700,000; cash restricted for future plant expansion \(500,000; short-term Treasury bills \)180,000; cash advance received from customer \(900 (not included in checking account balance); cash advance of \)7,000 to company executive, payable on demand; refundable deposit of $26,000 paid to federal government to guarantee performance on construction contract.

GROUPWORK (Income Effects of Receivables Transactions) Sandburg Company requires additional cash for its business. Sandburg has decided to use its accounts receivable to raise the additional cash and has asked you to determine the income statement effects of the following contemplated transactions.

1. On July 1, 2017, Sandburg assigned \(400,000 of accounts receivable to Keller Finance Company. Sandburg received an advance from Keller of 80% of the assigned accounts receivable less a commission of 3% on the advance. Prior to December 31, 2017, Sandburg collected \)220,000 on the assigned accounts receivable, and remitted \(232,720 to Keller, \)12,720 of which represented interest on the advance from Keller.

2. On December 1, 2017, Sandburg sold \(300,000 of net accounts receivable to Wunsch Company for \)270,000. The receivables were sold outright on a without recourse basis.

3. On December 31, 2017, an advance of \(120,000 was received from First Bank by pledging \)160,000 of Sandburg’s accounts receivable. Sandburg’s first payment to First Bank is due on January 30, 2018.

Instructions

Prepare a schedule showing the income statement effects for the year ended December 31, 2017, as a result of the above facts.

What is the theoretical justification of the allowance method as contrasted with the direct write-off method of accounting for bad debts?

Assume that Toni Braxton Company has recently fallen into financial difficulties. By reviewing all available evidence on December 31, 2017, one of Toni Braxton’s creditors, the National American Bank, determined that Toni Braxton would pay back only 65% of the principal at maturity. As a result, the bank decided that the loan was impaired. If the loss is estimated to be $225,000, what entry(ies) should National American Bank make to record this loss?

Corrs Wholesalers Co. sells industrial equipment for a standard 3-year note receivable. Revenue is recognized at time of sale. Each note is secured by a lien on the equipment and has a face amount equal to the equipment’s list price. Each note’s stated interest rate is below the customer’s market rate at date of sale. All notes are to be collected in three equal annual installments beginning one year after sale. Some of the notes are subsequently sold to a bank with recourse, some are subsequently sold without recourse, and some are retained by Corrs. At year end, Corrs evaluates all outstanding notes receivable and provides for estimated losses arising from defaults.

Instructions

What is the appropriate valuation basis for Corrs’s notes receivable at the date it sells equipment?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Business Studies Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free