(Depreciation Concepts) As a cost accountant for San Francisco Cannery, you have been approached by Phil Perriman, canning room supervisor, about the 2017 costs charged to his department. In particular, he is concerned about the line item “depreciation.” Perriman is very proud of the excellent condition of his canning room equipment. He has always been vigilant about keeping all equipment serviced and well oiled. He is sure that the huge charge to depreciation is a mistake; it does not at all reflect the cost of minimal wear and tear that the machines have experienced over the last year. He believes that the charge should be considerably lower.

The machines being depreciated are six automatic canning machines. All were put into use on January 1, 2017. Each cost \(625,000, having a salvage value of \)55,000 and a useful life of 12 years. San Francisco depreciates this and similar assets using double-declining-balance depreciation. Perriman has also pointed out that if you used straight-line depreciation, the charge to his department would not be so great.

Instructions

Write a memo dated January 22, 2017, to Phil Perriman to clear up his misunderstanding of the term “depreciation.” Also, calculate year-1 depreciation on all machines using both methods. Explain the theoretical justification for double-declining-balance and why, in the long run, the aggregate charge to depreciation will be the same under both methods.

Short Answer

Expert verified

Answer

During the earlier years of an asset’s life, the double-declining-balance method results in higher depreciation charges because it doubles the straight-line rate which would have been made under the straight-line method.

Step by step solution

01

Step-by-Step SolutionStep 1: Meaning of Depreciation

In an accounting term, depreciation can be referred to as an expense incurred on an intangible asset due to its corrosion and abrasion. A firm may adopt various methods for computing depreciation to reflect the true and accurate value of the asset.

02

Writing the memo to Phil Perriman

To: Phil Perriman, Supervisor of Canning Room

From:

Date:

Subject: Annual depreciation charge to the canning department

This memo responds to your inquiries concerning the depreciation charge levied against your department. The $625,000 fee seems exorbitant; but, it is not designed to represent the machinery's wear and tear over the previous year. Rather, a portion of the machine's cost has been set aside for this period.

It is generally believed that depreciation indicates a decline in the value of an item over time. Depreciation distributes a portion of an asset's cost for each period over its useful life in a methodical manner for financial statement reasons. Although an asset's value will constantly fall over time, the depreciation charge is a “periodic fee” for utilizing the acquired equipment during any particular period. When you evaluate the impact on your departmental expenditures, the alternative—expensing the complete cost of all six computers this year—is more equitable.

You also suggested that employing straight-line depreciation instead of the existing double-declining-balance technique would result in a lower charge. This is especially true in the equipment's early years. For each canning machine's twelve-year life, straight-line depreciation charges the same amount of depreciation. For this and all the following years, the straight-line charge would be $47,500 per machine, for a total yearly depreciation of $285,000.

Since it is twice the straight-line rate that would have been made under the straight-line technique, the double-declining-balance method results in larger depreciation charges throughout the early years of an asset's life. However, the same percentage depreciation is applied to the asset's diminishing book value each year. As a result, during the asset's latter years of life, the double-declining-balance charge is smaller than the straight-line charge. As previously stated, the price for this year is $625,000, although this expenditure will decrease in the following years. Regardless of the technology used, the same amount of depreciation could be recovered by the end of the twelfth year.

This year, the straight-line strategy would result in fewer charges being filed against your department. Consider this: when the asset is new, the cost of additional servicing and maintenance is modest. As a result, a larger share of the asset's cost should be devoted to this ideal section of its life. Your department will have to bear the increased expense of repair and maintenance after a few years. Wouldn't it be better to have a reduced depreciation charge at that time?

I hope that this explanation resolves the questions you might have concerning the depreciation charges against your department.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

What are the major factors considered in determining what depreciation method to use?

What is a modified accelerated cost recovery system (MACRS)? Speculate as to why this system is now required for tax purposes.

Dickinson Inc. owns the following assets.

Asset

Cost

Salvage

Estimated useful life

A

\(70,000

\)7,000

10 years

B

50,000

5,000

5 years

C

82,000

4,000

12 years

Compute the composite depreciation rate and the composite life of Dickinson’s assets.

If Remmers, Inc. uses the composite method and its composite rate is 7.5% per year, what entry should it make when plant assets that originally cost \(50,000 and have been used for 10 years are sold for \)14,000?

(Comprehensive Fixed-Asset Problem) Darby Sporting Goods Inc. has been experiencing growth in the demand for its products over the last several years. The last two Olympic Games greatly increased the popularity of basketball around the world. As a result, a European sports retailing consortium entered into an agreement with Darby’s Roundball Division to purchase basketballs and other accessories on an increasing basis over the next 5 years.

To be able to meet the quantity commitments of this agreement, Darby had to obtain additional manufacturing capacity. A real estate firm located an available factory in close proximity to Darby’s Roundball manufacturing facility, and Darby agreed to purchase the factory and used machinery from Encino Athletic Equipment Company on October 1, 2016. Renovations were necessary to convert the factory for Darby’s manufacturing use.

The terms of the agreement required Darby to pay Encino \(50,000 when renovations started on January 1, 2017, with the balance to be paid as renovations were completed. The overall purchase price for the factory and machinery was \)400,000. The building renovations were contracted to Malone Construction at \(100,000. The payments made, as renovations progressed during 2017, are shown below. The factory was placed in service on January 1, 2018.

1/1

4/1

10/1

12/31

Encino

\)50,000

\(90,000

\)110,000

\(150,000

Malone

30,000

30,000

40,000

On January 1, 2017, Darby secured a \)500,000 line-of-credit with a 12% interest rate to finance the purchase cost of the factory and machinery, and the renovation costs. Darby drew down on the line-of-credit to meet the payment schedule shown above; this was Darby’s only outstanding loan during 2017.

Bob Sprague, Darby’s controller, will capitalize the maximum allowable interest costs for this project. Darby’s policy regarding purchases of this nature is to use the appraisal value of the land for book purposes and prorate the balance of the purchase price over the remaining items. The building had originally cost Encino \(300,000 and had a net book value of \)50,000, while the machinery originally cost \(125,000 and had a net book value of \)40,000 on the date of sale. The land was recorded on Encino’s books at \(40,000. An appraisal, conducted by independent appraisers at the time of acquisition, valued the land at \)290,000, the building at \(105,000, and the machinery at \)45,000.

Angie Justice, chief engineer, estimated that the renovated plant would be used for 15 years, with an estimated salvage value of \(30,000. Justice estimated that the productive machinery would have a remaining useful life of 5 years and a salvage value of \)3,000. Darby’s depreciation policy specifies the 200% declining-balance method for machinery and the 150% decliningbalance method for the

plant. One-half year’s depreciation is taken in the year the plant is placed in service, and one-half year is allowed when the property is disposed of or retired. Darby uses a 360-day year for calculating interest costs.

Instructions

  1. Determine the amounts to be recorded on the books of Darby Sporting Goods Inc. as of December 31, 2017, for each of the following properties acquired from Encino Athletic Equipment Company.
    1. Land.
    2. Buildings.
    3. Machinery.
  2. Calculate Darby Sporting Goods Inc.’s 2018 depreciation expense, for book purposes, for each of the properties acquired from Encino Athletic Equipment Company.
  3. Discuss the arguments for and against the capitalization of interest costs.
See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Business Studies Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free