Describe cost depletion and percentage depletion. Why is the percentage depletion method permitted?

Short Answer

Expert verified

Percentage depletion has arisen, in part, from the difficulty of valuing the natural resource or determining the discovery value of the asset and of determining the recoverable units.

Step by step solution

01

Step-by-Step SolutionStep 1: Meaning of Depletion

Depletion is defined as a reduction in the quantity of a production factor due to the manufacturing process. Companies generate new products by combining current goods and services. When old items are turned into new products, it is termed a production process.

02

Explaining the cost depletion and percentage depletion

The process of methodically charging the capitalized costs of a natural resource to operations, less residual land values, is known as cost depletion. The goal of this process is to match the resource's cost to its income. The conventional approach for calculating a depletion fee for each unit removed is to divide the total cost less residual value by the projected number of recovered units. An adjustment to the unit fee will be required if the estimate of recovered units changes.

Proportion depletion is a process permitted by the Internal Revenue Code that involves allocating a particular percentage of gross income to operations in order to arrive at taxable income. Because it is unrelated to the asset's cost and is allowed even when the property is fully depleted under cost depletion accounting, percentage depletion is not considered a universally recognized accounting principle. For practically all natural resources, applicable rates ranging from 5% to 22% of total revenue are indicated.

The difficulty of evaluating the natural resource or estimating the discovery value of the item, as well as calculating the recoverable units, has contributed to percentage depletion. Although there have been various reasons for preserving percentage depletion, one of the most compelling is its utility in driving the hunt for new resources. Providing an incentive for the continued search for natural resources is judged to be in the national interest. Percentage depletion is no longer authorized for many businesses, as stated in the textbook.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Jurassic Company owns equipment that cost \(900,000 and has accumulated depreciation of \)380,000. The expected future net cash flows from the use of the asset are expected to be \(500,000. The fair value of the equipment is \)400,000. Prepare the journal entry, if any, to record the impairment loss.

(Depreciation Choice—Ethics) Jerry Prior, Beeler Corporation’s controller, is concerned that net income may be lower this year. He is afraid upper-level management might recommend cost reductions by laying off accounting staff, including him.

Prior knows that depreciation is a major expense for Beeler. The company currently uses the double-declining-balance method for both financial reporting and tax purposes, and he’s thinking of selling equipment that, given its age, is primarily used when there are periodic spikes in demand. The equipment has a carrying value of \(2,000,000 and a fair value of \)2,180,000. The gain on the sale would be reported in the income statement. He doesn’t want to highlight this method of increasing income. He thinks, “Why don’t I increase the estimated useful lives and the salvage values? That will decrease depreciation expense and require less extensive disclosure, since the changes are accounted for prospectively. I may be able to save my job and those of my staff.”

Instructions

Answer the following questions.

  1. Who are the stakeholders in this situation?
  2. What are the ethical issues involved?
  3. What should Prior do?

In what way may the use of percentage depletion violate sound accounting theory?

(Depreciation—Replacement, Change in Estimate) Greg Maddox Company constructed a building at a cost of \(2,200,000 and occupied it beginning in January 1998. It was estimated at that time that its life would be 40 years, with no salvage value.

In January 2018, a new roof was installed at a cost of \)300,000, and it was estimated then that the building would have a useful life of 25 years from that date. The cost of the old roof was $160,000.

Instructions

  1. What amount of depreciation should have been charged annually from the years 1998 to 2017? (Assume straight-line depreciation.)
  2. What entry should be made in 2018 to record the replacement of the roof?
  3. Prepare the entry in January 2018 to record the revision in the estimated life of the building if necessary.
  4. What amount of depreciation should be charged for the year 2018?

Everly Corporation acquires a coal mine at a cost of \(400,000. Intangible development costs total \)100,000. After extraction has occurred, Everly must restore the property (estimated fair value of the obligation is \(80,000), after which it can be sold for \)160,000. Everly estimates that 4,000 tons of coal can be extracted. If 700 tons are extracted the first year, prepare the journal entry to record depletion.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Business Studies Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free