Log out Go to App
Go to App

Learning Materials

Features

Discover

Chapter 16: 3Q (page 873)

Discuss the similarities and the differences between convertible debt and debt issued with stock warrants.

Short Answer

Expert verified

Convertible bonds convey the choice of change into common stock at a predetermined cost during a specific period. Stock purchase warrants are given with bonds or preferred stock as an incitement to the investor.

Step by step solution

01

The similarities and the differences between convertible debt and debt issued with stock warrants

Convertible debt and debt issued with stock warrants are comparative in that: (1) both permit the guarantor to give issued stock warrants at a lower revenue cost than would commonly be accessible for straight obligation; (2) both permit the holders to buy the backer's stock at not as much as market esteem assuming the stock likes adequately from now on; (3) both gives the holder the insurance of and Debt security in the event that the worth of the stock doesn't appreciate; and (4) both are perplexing protections which contain components of debt and value at the hour of issue.

02

Primary characteristics of convertible debt and debt issued with stock warrants

Since Stock purchase warrants grant the acquisition of the organization’s common stock at a stated price at any time. Convertible debt can be redeemed or converted after a predefined period.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Start your free trial

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Which of the following statements is correct?

a) IFRS separates the proceeds of a convertible bond between debt and equity by determining the fair value of the debt component before the equity component.

b) Both IFRS and GAAP assume that when there is a choice of settlement of an option for cash or shares, share settlement is assumed.

c) IFRS separates the proceeds of a convertible bond between debt and equity, based on relative fair values.

d) Both GAAP and IFRS separate the proceeds of convertible bonds between debt and equity.

Financial Statement Analysis Case

Ragatz, Inc.

Ragatz, Inc., a drug company, reported the following information. The company prepares its financial statements in accordance with GAAP.

2017 (000)

Current liabilities

\(554,114

Convertible subordinated debts

648,020

Total liabilities

1,228,313

Stockholder’s equity

176,413

Net income

58,333

Analysts attempting to compare Ragatz to drug companies that issue debt with detachable warrants may face a challenge due to differences in accounting for convertible debt.

Instructions

(a) Compute the following ratios for Ragatz, Inc. (Assume that year-end balances approximate annual averages.)

(1) Return on assets.

(2) Return on common stock equity.

(3) Debt to assets ratio.

(b) Briefly discuss the operating performance and financial position of Ragatz. Industry averages for these ratios in 2017 were ROA 3.5%; return on equity 16%; and debt to assets 75%. Based on this analysis, would you make an investment in the company’s 5% convertible bonds? Explain.

(c) Assume you want to compare Ragatz to an IFRS company like Merck (which issues nonconvertible debt with detachable warrants). Assuming that the fair value of the equity component of Ragatz’s convertible bonds is \)150,000, how would you adjust the analysis above to make valid comparisons between Ragatz and Merck?

Question: . Mae Jong Corp. issues \(1,000,000 of 10% bonds payable which may be converted into 10,000 shares of \)2 par value ordinary shares. The market rate of interest on similar bonds is 12%. Interest is payable annually on December 31, and the bonds were issued for total proceeds of $1,000,000. In accounting for these bonds, Mae Jong Corp. will:

(a) first assign a value to the equity component, then determine the liability component.

(b) assign no value to the equity component since the conversion privilege is not separable from the bond.

(c) first assign a value to the liability component based on the face amount of the bond.

(d) use the “with-and-without” method to value the compound instrument.

(Conversion of Bonds) Vargo Company has bonds payable outstanding in the amount of \(500,000, and the Premium on Bonds Payable account has a balance of \)7,500. Each \(1,000 bond is convertible into 20 shares of preferred stock of parvalue of \)50 per share. All bonds are converted into preferred stock.

McIntyre Corporation issued 2,000 $1,000 bonds at 101. Each bond was issued with one detachable stock warrant. After issuance, the bonds were selling separately at 98. The market price of the warrants without the bonds cannot be determined. Use the incremental method to record the issuance of the bonds and warrants.
See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Business Studies Textbooks

Business Development

Read Explanation

Managerial Economics

Read Explanation

Business Operations

Read Explanation

Operational Management

Read Explanation

Change Management

Read Explanation

Corporate Finance

Read Explanation
View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free