(Issuance, Exercise, and Termination of Stock Options) On January 1, 2018, Titania Inc. granted stock options to officers and key employees for the purchase of 20,000 shares of the company’s \(10 par common stock at \)25 per share. The options were exercisable within a 5-year period beginning January 1, 2020, by grantees still in the employ of the company, and expiring December 31, 2024. The service period for this award is 2 years. Assume that the fair value option-pricing model determines total compensation expense to be \(350,000.On April 1, 2019, 2,000 options were terminated when the employees resigned from the company. The market price of the common stock was \)35 per share on this date.On March 31, 2020, 12,000 options were exercised when the market price of the common stock was $40 per share.

Instructions

Prepare journal entries to record issuance of the stock options, termination of the stock options, exercise of the stock options, and charges to compensation expense, for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2019, and 2020.

Short Answer

Expert verified

Journal entries are recorded in Step 2.

Step by step solution

01

Explanations Stock Options

Stock options allows the investors to buy or sell the security, as a right to buy or sell the security at given price and date which are pre-determined in the contract.

02

Journal entries

Date

Transactions

Debit

Credit

Jan 1, 2018

No entry

December 31, 2018

Compensation Expense

$175,000

Paid-in Capital—Stock Options

$175,000

To record compensation expense for 2018 ($350,000 x ½)

April 1, 2019

Paid-in Capital—Stock Options

17,500

Compensation Expense

17,500

To record Termination of stock option

($175,000 x 2,000 / 20,000 )

Dec31, 2019

Compensation Expense

157,500

Paid-in Capital—Stock Options

157,500

To record compensation expense of 2019

($350,000 x ½ x 18/20)

Mar 31, 2020

Cash (12,000 x $25)

$300,000

Paid-in Capital—Stock Options (350,000 x 12,000 / 20,000)

$210,000

Common Stock

$120,000

Paid-in Capital in Excess of Par

$390,000

To record exercise of stock option

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Explain how the conversion feature of convertible debt has a value (a) to the issuer and (b) to the purchaser.

How is compensation expense computed using the fair value approach?

(EPS: Simple Capital Structure) At January 1, 2017, Langley Company’s outstanding shares included the following.

280,000 shares of \(50 par value, 7% cumulative preferred stock

900,000 shares of \)1 par value common stock

Net income for 2017 was \(2,530,000. No cash dividends were declared or paid during 2017. On February 15, 2018, however, all preferred dividends in arrears were paid, together with a 5% stock dividend on common shares. There were no dividends in arrears prior to 2017.

On April 1, 2017, 450,000 shares of common stock were sold for \)10 per share, and on October 1, 2017, 110,000 shares of common stock were purchased for $20 per share and held as treasury stock.

Instructions

Compute earnings per share for 2017. Assume that financial statements for 2017 were issued in March 2018.

Question: Petrenko Corporation has outstanding 2,000 \(1,000 bonds, each convertible into 50 shares of \)10 par value ordinary shares. The bonds are converted on December 31, 2017. The bonds payable has a carrying value of \(1,950,000 and conversion equity of \)20,000. Record the conversion using the book value method.

CA16-4 WRITING (Stock Compensation Plans) The following two items appeared on the Internet concerning the GAAP requirement to expense stock options.

WASHINGTON, D.C.—February 17, 2005 Congressman David Dreier (R–CA), Chairman of the House Rules Committee, and Congresswoman Anna Eshoo (D–CA) reintroduced legislation today that will preserve broad-based employee stock option plans and give investors critical information they need to understand how employee stock options impact the value of their shares.

“Last year, the U.S. House of Representatives overwhelmingly voted for legislation that would have ensured the continued ability of innovative companies to offer stock options to rank-and-file employees,” Dreier stated. “Both the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) continue to ignore our calls to address legitimate concerns about the impact of FASB’s new standard on workers’ ability to have an ownership stake in the New Economy, and its failure to address the real need of shareholders: accurate and meaningful information about a company’s use of stock options.”

In December 2004, FASB issued a stock option expensing standard that will render a huge blow to the 21st century economy,” Dreier said. “Their action and the SEC’s apparent lack of concern for protecting shareholders, requires us to once again take a firm stand on the side of investors and economic growth. Giving investors the ability to understand how stock options impact the value of their shares is critical. And equally important is preserving the ability of companies to use this innovative tool to attract talented employees.”

“Here We Go Again!” by Jack Ciesielski (2/21/2005, http://www.accountingobserver.com/blog/2005/02/here-we-go-again) On February 17, Congressman David Dreier (R–CA), and Congresswoman Anna Eshoo (D–CA), officially entered Silicon Valley’s bid to gum up the launch of honest reporting of stock option compensation: They co-sponsored a bill to “preserve broad-based employee stock option plans and give investors critical information they need to understand how employee stock options impact the value of their shares.” You know what “critical information” they mean: stuff like the stock compensation for the top five officers in a company, with a rigged value set as close to zero as possible. Investors crave this kind of information. Other ways the good Congresspersons want to “help” investors: The bill “also requires the SEC to study the effectiveness of those disclosures over three years, during which time, no new accounting standard related to the treatment of stock options could be recognized. Finally, the bill requires the Secretary of Commerce to conduct a study and report to Congress on the impact of broad-based employee stock option plans on expanding employee corporate ownership, skilled worker recruitment and retention, research and innovation, economic growth, and international competitiveness.”

It’s the old “four corners” basketball strategy: stall, stall, stall. In the meantime, hope for regime change at your opponent, the FASB.

Instructions

(a) What are the major recommendations of the stock-based compensation pronouncement?

(b) How do the provisions of GAAP in this area differ from the bill introduced by members of Congress (Dreier and Eshoo), which would require expensing for options issued to only the top five officers in a company? Which approach do you think would result in more useful information? (Focus on comparability.)

(c) The bill in Congress urges the FASB to develop a rule that preserves “the ability of companies to use this innovative tool to attract talented employees.” Write a response to these Congress-people explaining the importance of neutrality in financial accounting and reporting.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Business Studies Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free