Log out Go to App
Go to App

Learning Materials

Features

Discover

Chapter 16: Q19E (page 879)

(EPS: Simple Capital Structure) A portion of the combined statement of income and retained earnings of Seminole Inc. for the current year follows.

Income from continuing operations \(15,000,000

Loss from discontinued operations, net of

applicable income tax (Note 1) 1,340,000

Net income 13,660,000

Retained earnings at the beginning of the year 83,250,000

96,910,000

Dividends declared:

On preferred stock—\)6.00 per share \( 300,000

On common stock—\)1.75 per share 14,875,000 15,175,000

Retained earnings at the end of the year \(81,735,000

Note 1. During the year, Seminole Inc. suffered a major loss from discontinued operations of \)1,340,000 after applicable income tax reduction of \(1,200,000.

At the end of the current year, Seminole Inc. has outstanding 8,500,000 shares of \)10 par common stock and 50,000 shares of 6% preferred. On April 1 of the current year, Seminole Inc. issued 1,000,000 shares of common stock for $32 per share to help finance the loss from discontinued operations.

Instructions

Compute the earnings per share on common stock for the current year as it should be reported to stockholders

Short Answer

Expert verified

The earnings per share on common stock for the current year to be reported to stockholders is $1.62

Step by step solution

01

Computation of net income available for shareholders-

Income from continuous operations

$15,000,000

Less: Preferred dividend

($300,000)

Common stock Income from continuous operations

$14,700,000

Less: Loss from discontinued operations, net of applicable income tax

($1,340,000)

Net Income

$13,360,000

02

Computation of weighted average no of shares outstanding-

Date

Shares outstanding

Fraction

Weighted shares

Jan 1

7,500,000

3/12

$1,875,000

Apr 1

8,500,000

9/12

$6,375,000

$8,250,000

03

Computation of earnings per share-

Income before extraordinary loss ($14,700,000

/ $8,250,000)

1.78

Less: Extraordinary loss ($1,340,000/$8,250,000)

(0.16)

Net Income (10,520,000/5,250,000)

1.62

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Start your free trial

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

CA16-4 WRITING (Stock Compensation Plans) The following two items appeared on the Internet concerning the GAAP requirement to expense stock options.

WASHINGTON, D.C.—February 17, 2005 Congressman David Dreier (R–CA), Chairman of the House Rules Committee, and Congresswoman Anna Eshoo (D–CA) reintroduced legislation today that will preserve broad-based employee stock option plans and give investors critical information they need to understand how employee stock options impact the value of their shares.

“Last year, the U.S. House of Representatives overwhelmingly voted for legislation that would have ensured the continued ability of innovative companies to offer stock options to rank-and-file employees,” Dreier stated. “Both the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) continue to ignore our calls to address legitimate concerns about the impact of FASB’s new standard on workers’ ability to have an ownership stake in the New Economy, and its failure to address the real need of shareholders: accurate and meaningful information about a company’s use of stock options.”

In December 2004, FASB issued a stock option expensing standard that will render a huge blow to the 21st century economy,” Dreier said. “Their action and the SEC’s apparent lack of concern for protecting shareholders, requires us to once again take a firm stand on the side of investors and economic growth. Giving investors the ability to understand how stock options impact the value of their shares is critical. And equally important is preserving the ability of companies to use this innovative tool to attract talented employees.”

“Here We Go Again!” by Jack Ciesielski (2/21/2005, http://www.accountingobserver.com/blog/2005/02/here-we-go-again) On February 17, Congressman David Dreier (R–CA), and Congresswoman Anna Eshoo (D–CA), officially entered Silicon Valley’s bid to gum up the launch of honest reporting of stock option compensation: They co-sponsored a bill to “preserve broad-based employee stock option plans and give investors critical information they need to understand how employee stock options impact the value of their shares.” You know what “critical information” they mean: stuff like the stock compensation for the top five officers in a company, with a rigged value set as close to zero as possible. Investors crave this kind of information. Other ways the good Congresspersons want to “help” investors: The bill “also requires the SEC to study the effectiveness of those disclosures over three years, during which time, no new accounting standard related to the treatment of stock options could be recognized. Finally, the bill requires the Secretary of Commerce to conduct a study and report to Congress on the impact of broad-based employee stock option plans on expanding employee corporate ownership, skilled worker recruitment and retention, research and innovation, economic growth, and international competitiveness.”

It’s the old “four corners” basketball strategy: stall, stall, stall. In the meantime, hope for regime change at your opponent, the FASB.

Instructions

(a) What are the major recommendations of the stock-based compensation pronouncement?

(b) How do the provisions of GAAP in this area differ from the bill introduced by members of Congress (Dreier and Eshoo), which would require expensing for options issued to only the top five officers in a company? Which approach do you think would result in more useful information? (Focus on comparability.)

(c) The bill in Congress urges the FASB to develop a rule that preserves “the ability of companies to use this innovative tool to attract talented employees.” Write a response to these Congress-people explaining the importance of neutrality in financial accounting and reporting.

Question: (Conversion of Bonds) On January 1, 2017, Gottlieb Corporation issued \(4,000,000 of 10-year, 8% convertible debentures at 102. Interest is to be paid semi-annually on June 30 and December 31. Each \)1,000 debenture can be converted into eight shares of Gottlieb Corporation \(100 par value common stock after December 31, 2018. On January 1, 2019, \)400,000 of debentures are converted into common stock, which is then selling at \(110. An additional \)400,000 of debentures are converted on March 31, 2019. The market price of the common stock is then $115. Accrued interest at March 31 will be paid on the next interest date. Bond premium is amortized on a straight-line basis.

Make the necessary journal entries for:

(a) December 31, 2018. (c) March 31, 2019.

(b) January 1, 2019. (d) June 30, 2019.

Record the conversions using the book value method

(Warrants Issued with Bonds and Convertible Bonds) Incurring long-term debt with an arrangement whereby lenders receive an option to buy common stock during all or a portion of the time the debt is outstanding is a frequent corporate financing practice. In some situations, the result is achieved through the issuance of convertible bonds; in others, the debt instruments and the warrants to buy stock are separate.

Instructions

(a) (1) Describe the differences that exist in current accounting for original proceeds of the issuance of convertible bonds and of debt instruments with separate warrants to purchase common stock.

(2) Discuss the underlying rationale for the differences described in (a)(1) above.

(3) Summarize the arguments that have been presented in favor of accounting for convertible bonds in the same manner as accounting for debt with separate warrants.

(b) At the start of the year, Huish Company issued \(18,000,000 of 12% bonds along with detachable warrants to buy 1,200,000 shares of its \)10 par value common stock at \(18 per share. The bonds mature over the next 10 years, starting one year from date of issuance, with annual maturities of \)1,800,000. At the time, Huish had 9,600,000 shares of common stock outstanding. The company received $20,040,000 for the bonds and the warrants. For Huish Company, 12% was a relatively low borrowing rate. If offered alone, at this time, the bonds would have sold in the market at a 22% discount. Prepare the journal entry (or entries) for the issuance of the bonds and warrants for the cash consideration received.

IFRS16-12 Assume the same information in IFRS16-11, except that Angela Corporation converts its convertible bonds on January 1, 2017.

Instructions

(a) Compute the carrying value of the bond payable on January 1, 2017.

(b) Prepare the journal entry to record the conversion on January 1, 2017.

(c) Assume that the bonds were repurchased on January 1, 2017, for \(1,940,000 cash instead of being converted. The net present value of the liability component of the convertible bonds on January 1, 2017, is \)1,900,000. Prepare the journal entry to record the repurchase on January 1, 2017.

(L04) (EPS: Simple Capital Structure) Ace Company had 200,000 shares of common stock outstanding on December 31, 2018. During the year 2019, the company issued 8,000 shares on May 1 and retired 14,000 shares on October 31. For the year 2019, Ace Company reported net income of \(249,690 after a loss from discontinued operations of \)40,600 (net of tax).

Instructions

What earnings per share data should be reported at the bottom of its income statement?
See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Business Studies Textbooks

Change Management

Read Explanation

Strategic Analysis

Read Explanation

Intermediate Accounting

Read Explanation

Corporate Finance

Read Explanation

Financial Performance

Read Explanation

Strategic Direction

Read Explanation
View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free