(Basic EPS: Two-Year Presentation) Melton Corporation is preparing the comparative financial statements for the annual report to its shareholders for fiscal years ended May 31, 2017, and May 31, 2018. The income from operations for thefiscal year ended May 31, 2017, was \(1,800,000 and income from continuing operations for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2018, was \)2,500,000. In both years, the company incurred a 10% interest expense on \(2,400,000 of debt, an obligation that requires interestonly payments for 5 years. The company experienced a loss from discontinued operations of \)600,000 on February 2018. The company uses a 40% effective tax rate for income taxes.

The capital structure of Melton Corporation on June 1, 2016, consisted of 1 million shares of common stock outstanding and 20,000 shares of \(50 par value, 6%, cumulative preferred stock. There were no preferred dividends in arrears, and the company had not issued any convertible securities, options, or warrants.

On October 1, 2016, Melton sold an additional 500,000 shares of the common stock at \)20 per share. Melton distributed a 20% stock dividend on the common shares outstanding on January 1, 2017. On December 1, 2017, Melton was able to sell an additional 800,000 shares of the common stock at $22 per share. These were the only common stock transactions that occurred during the two fiscal years.

Instructions

(a) Identify whether the capital structure at Melton Corporation is a simple or complex capital structure and explain why.

(b) Determine the weighted-average number of shares that Melton Corporation would use in calculating earnings per share for the fiscal year ended: (1) May 31, 2017. (2) May 31, 2018.

(c) Prepare, in good form, a comparative income statement, beginning with income from operations, for Melton Corportion for the fiscal years ended May 31, 2017, and May 31, 2018. This statement will be included in Melton’s annual report and should display the appropriate earnings per share presentations.

Short Answer

Expert verified

(a) Simple capital structureis the capital structure of Melton Corporation.

(b) Weighted Average no of shares:May 31, 2017-1,600,000; May 31, 2018 – 2,200,000

(c) Earnings Per Share:

EARNINGS PER SHARE:

Income before extraordinary loss

$0.55

$0.59

Extraordinary loss

0

$0.16

Net Income

$0.55

$0.43

Step by step solution

01

Meaning of Simple Capital Structure

An organization with a simple capital structure has no protections remarkable that might potentially dilute the value of its earnings per share. It implies that its capital structure incorporates common and non-convertible preferred stock.

02

a. Identification

(a) The capital structure of Melton Corporation is considered a simple capital structure because it does not have any convertible securities

03

 Step 3: b. Calculation of weighted average number of shares 

For the year ended May 31, 2017

Date Outstanding

Shares Outstanding

Restatement

Fraction of year

Weighted shares

Beginning Balance

June 1- Oct 1

1,000,000

1.2

4/12

400,000

New Issue

Oct 1- May 31

1,500,000

1.2

8/12

1,200,000

1,600,000

Note: Shares outstanding between Oct 1 to May 31 are 1,500,000, i.e.,

(1,000,000+500,000)

For the year ended May 31, 2018

Date Outstanding

Shares Outstanding

Restatement

Fraction of year

Weighted shares

Beginning Balance

June 1- Oct 1

1,800,000

6/12

900,000

New Issue

Oct 1- May 31

2,600,000

6/12

1,300,000

2,200,000

04

c. preparinga comparative income statement

MELTON CORPORATION

Comparative Income Statement

for fiscal year ended May 31, 2020, and 2021


2017

2018

Income from Operations

$1,800,000

$2,500,000

Less: Interest expense

(240,000)

(240,000)

Income tax before tax

1,560,000

2,260,000

Less: Income tax 40%

(624,000)

(904,000)

Income before extraordinary items

936,000

1,356,000

Less: Extraordinary loss (600,000-40%)

0

(360,000)

Net Income

$936,000

$996,000

EARNINGS PER SHARE:

Income before extraordinary loss

[(Income before extraordinary items - Preferred dividend)/Average outstanding shares]

$0.55

$0.59

Extraordinary loss

[(Extraordinary loss - Preferred dividend)/Average outstanding shares]

0

(0.16)

Net Income

[(Net Income- Preferred dividend)/Average outstanding shares]

$0.55

$0.43

Working note:

Computation of preferred dividend

Prefereddividend=Shares×Pricepershare×Rateofdividend=20,000×$50×6%=$60,000

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

(EPS with Stock Dividend and Discontinued Operations) Christina Corporation is preparing the comparative financial statements to be included in the annual report to stockholders. Christina employs a fiscal year ending May 31.

Income from operations before income taxes for Christina was \(1,400,000 and \)660,000, respectively, for fiscal years ended May 31, 2018 and 2017. Christina experienced a loss from discontinued operations of \(400,000 on March 3, 2018. A 40% combined income tax rate pertains to any and all of Christina Corporation’s profits, gains, and losses.

Christina’s capital structure consists of preferred stock and common stock. The company has not issued any convertible securities or warrants and there are no outstanding stock options.

Christina issued 40,000 shares of \)100 par value, 6% cumulative preferred stock in 2014. All of this stock is outstanding, and no preferred dividends are in arrears.

There were 1,000,000 shares of \(1 par common stock outstanding on June 1, 2016. On September 1, 2016, Christina sold an additional 400,000 shares of the common stock at \)17 per share. Christina distributed a 20% stock dividend on the common shares outstanding on December 1, 2017. These were the only common stock transactions during the past 2 fiscal years.

Instructions

(a) Determine the weighted-average number of common shares that would be used in computing earnings per share on the current comparative income statement for:

(1) The year ended May 31, 2017.

(2) The year ended May 31, 2018.

(b) Starting with income from operations before income taxes, prepare a comparative income statement for the years ended May 31, 2018 and 2017. The statement will be part of Christina Corporation’s annual report to stockholders and should include appropriate earnings per share presentation.

(c) The capital structure of a corporation is the result of its past financing decisions. Furthermore, the earnings per share data presented on a corporation’s financial statements is dependent upon the capital structure.

(1) Explain why Christina Corporation is considered to have a simple capital structure.

(2) Describe how earnings per share data would be presented for a corporation that has a complex capital structure.

Explain the treasury-stock method as it applies to options and warrants in computing dilutive earnings per share data.

(Weighted-Average Number of Shares) Newton Inc. uses a calendar year for financial reporting. The company is authorized to issue 9,000,000 shares of $10 par common stock. At no time has Newton issued any potentially dilutive securities. Listed below is a summary of Newton’s common stock activities.

1. Number of common shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2015 2,000,000

2. Shares issued as a result of a 10% stock dividend on September 30, 2016 200,000

3. Shares issued for cash on March 31, 2017 2,000,000Number of common shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2017 4,200,000

4. A 2-for-1 stock split of Newton’s common stock took place on March 31, 2018

Instructions

(a) Compute the weighted-average number of common shares used in computing earnings per common share for 2016 on the 2017 comparative income statement.

(b) Compute the weighted-average number of common shares used in computing earnings per common share for 2017 on the 2017 comparative income statement.

(c) Compute the weighted-average number of common shares to be used in computing earnings per common share for 2017 on the 2018 comparative income statement.

(d) Compute the weighted-average number of common shares to be used in computing earnings per common share for 2018 on the 2018 comparative income statement

CA16-4 WRITING (Stock Compensation Plans) The following two items appeared on the Internet concerning the GAAP requirement to expense stock options.

WASHINGTON, D.C.—February 17, 2005 Congressman David Dreier (R–CA), Chairman of the House Rules Committee, and Congresswoman Anna Eshoo (D–CA) reintroduced legislation today that will preserve broad-based employee stock option plans and give investors critical information they need to understand how employee stock options impact the value of their shares.

“Last year, the U.S. House of Representatives overwhelmingly voted for legislation that would have ensured the continued ability of innovative companies to offer stock options to rank-and-file employees,” Dreier stated. “Both the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) continue to ignore our calls to address legitimate concerns about the impact of FASB’s new standard on workers’ ability to have an ownership stake in the New Economy, and its failure to address the real need of shareholders: accurate and meaningful information about a company’s use of stock options.”

In December 2004, FASB issued a stock option expensing standard that will render a huge blow to the 21st century economy,” Dreier said. “Their action and the SEC’s apparent lack of concern for protecting shareholders, requires us to once again take a firm stand on the side of investors and economic growth. Giving investors the ability to understand how stock options impact the value of their shares is critical. And equally important is preserving the ability of companies to use this innovative tool to attract talented employees.”

“Here We Go Again!” by Jack Ciesielski (2/21/2005, http://www.accountingobserver.com/blog/2005/02/here-we-go-again) On February 17, Congressman David Dreier (R–CA), and Congresswoman Anna Eshoo (D–CA), officially entered Silicon Valley’s bid to gum up the launch of honest reporting of stock option compensation: They co-sponsored a bill to “preserve broad-based employee stock option plans and give investors critical information they need to understand how employee stock options impact the value of their shares.” You know what “critical information” they mean: stuff like the stock compensation for the top five officers in a company, with a rigged value set as close to zero as possible. Investors crave this kind of information. Other ways the good Congresspersons want to “help” investors: The bill “also requires the SEC to study the effectiveness of those disclosures over three years, during which time, no new accounting standard related to the treatment of stock options could be recognized. Finally, the bill requires the Secretary of Commerce to conduct a study and report to Congress on the impact of broad-based employee stock option plans on expanding employee corporate ownership, skilled worker recruitment and retention, research and innovation, economic growth, and international competitiveness.”

It’s the old “four corners” basketball strategy: stall, stall, stall. In the meantime, hope for regime change at your opponent, the FASB.

Instructions

(a) What are the major recommendations of the stock-based compensation pronouncement?

(b) How do the provisions of GAAP in this area differ from the bill introduced by members of Congress (Dreier and Eshoo), which would require expensing for options issued to only the top five officers in a company? Which approach do you think would result in more useful information? (Focus on comparability.)

(c) The bill in Congress urges the FASB to develop a rule that preserves “the ability of companies to use this innovative tool to attract talented employees.” Write a response to these Congress-people explaining the importance of neutrality in financial accounting and reporting.

CA16-2 ETHICS (Ethical Issues—Compensation Plan) The executive officers of Rouse Corporation have a performance-based compensation plan. The performance criteria of this plan is linked to growth in earnings per share. When annual EPS growth is 12%, the Rouse executives earn 100% of the shares; if growth is 16%, they earn 125%. If EPS growth is lower than 8%, the executives receive no additional compensation.

In 2014, Joan Devers, the controller of Rouse, reviews year-end estimates of bad debt expense and warranty expense. She calculates the EPS growth at 15%. Kurt Adkins, a member of the executive group, remarks over lunch one day that the estimate of bad debt expense might be decreased, increasing EPS growth to 16.1%. Devers is not sure she should do this because she believes that the current estimate of bad debts is sound. On the other hand, she recognizes that a great deal of subjectivity is involved in the computation.

Instructions

Answer the following questions.

(a) What, if any, is the ethical dilemma for Devers?

(b) Should Devers’s knowledge of the compensation plan be a factor that influences her estimate?

(c) How should Devers respond to Adkins’s request?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Business Studies Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free