McCormick Corporation issued a 4-year, \(40,000, 5% note to Greenbush Company on January 1, 2017, and received a computer that normally sells for \)31,495. The note requires annual interest payments each December 31. The market rate of interest for a note of similar risk is 12%. Prepare McCormick’s journal entries for (a) the January 1 issuance and (b) the December 31 interest.

Short Answer

Expert verified

The total for both the debit and credit sides is $43,779.40.

Step by step solution

01

Meaning of Discount on Notes Payable

The difference between the face value and the amount received for notes is a discount if the face value is higher than the received amount. It is amortized over the maturity period of notes payable.

02

Journal Entry

Journal Entries

Date

Accounts and Explanation

Debit

Credit

January 1, 2017

Computer

$31,495

Discount on Notes Payable

$8,505

Notes Payable

$40,000

December 31, 2017

Interest Expenses

$3,779.40

Discount on Notes Payable

$1,779.40

Cash

$2,000.00

Working:

Discount on notes payable on January 1= ($40,000-$31,495) = $8,505

Interest expenses on December 31 = ($31,495 x 12%) = $3,779.40

Interest paid in cash paid on December 31= ($40,000 x 5%) = $2,000.

Discount on notes payable on December 31 ($3,779.40-$2,000) = $1,779.40.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The following article appeared in the Wall Street Journal.

Bond Markets

Giant Commonwealth Edison Issue Hits Resale Market With \(70 Million Left Over

New york—Commonwealth Edison Co.’s slow-selling new 91 /4% bonds were tossed onto the resale market at a reduced price with about \)70 million still available from the \(200 million offered Thursday, dealers said.

The Chicago utility’s bonds, rated double-A by Moody’s and double-A-minus by Standard & Poor’s, originally had been priced at 99.803, to yield 9.3% in 5 years. They were marked down yesterday the equivalent of about \)5.50 for each $1,000 face amount, to about 99.25, where their yield jumped to 9.45%.

Instructions

  1. How will the development above affect the accounting for Commonwealth Edison’s bond issue?
  2. Provide several possible explanations for the markdown and the slow sale of Commonwealth Edison’s bonds.

(Amortization Schedule—Effective-Interest) Assume the same information as E14-6.

Instructions

Set up a schedule of interest expense and discount amortization under the effective-interest method. (Hint: The effective-interest rate must be computed.)

Distinguish between the following interest rates for bonds payable:

(a)Yield rate

(b) Nominal Rate

(c) Stated rate

(d) Market rate

(e) Effective rate

Matt Ryan Corporation is interested in building its own soda can manufacturing plant adjacent to its existing plant in Partyville, Kansas. The objective would be to ensure a steady supply of cans at a stable price and to minimize transportation costs. However, the company has been experiencing some financial problems and has been reluctant to borrow any additional cash to fund the project. The company is not concerned with the cash flow problems of making payments, but rather with the impact of adding additional long-term debt to its balance sheet.

The president of Ryan, Andy Newlin, approached the president of the Aluminum Can Company (ACC), its major supplier, to see if some agreement could be reached. ACC was anxious to work out an arrangement, since it seemed inevitable that Ryan would begin its own can production. The Aluminum Can Company could not afford to lose the account.

After some discussion, a two-part plan was worked out. First, ACC was to construct the plant on Ryan’s land adjacent to the existing plant. Second, Ryan would sign a 20-year purchase agreement. Under the purchase agreement, Ryan would express its intention to buy all of its cans from ACC, paying a unit price which at normal capacity would cover labor and material, an operating management fee, and the debt service requirements on the plant. The expected unit price, if transportation costs are taken into consideration, is lower than current market. If Ryan did not take enough production in any one year and if the excess cans could not be sold at a high enough price on the open market, Ryan agrees to make up any cash shortfall so that ACC could make the payments on its debt. The bank will be willing to make a 20-year loan for the plant, taking the plant and the purchase agreement as collateral. At the end of 20 years, the plant is to become the property of Ryan.

Instructions

  1. What are project financing arrangements using special-purpose entities?
  2. What are take-or-pay contracts?
  3. Should Ryan record the plant as an asset together with the related obligation?
  4. If not, should Ryan record an asset relating to the future commitment?
  5. What is meant by off-balance-sheet financing?

Question: The following information is taken from the 2017 annual report of Bugant, Inc. Bugant’s fiscal year ends December 31 of each year. Bugant’s December 31, 2017, balance sheet is as follows.

Bugant, Inc.

Balance Sheet

December 31, 2017

Assets

Cash \( 450

Inventory 1,800

Total current assets 2,250

Plant and equipment 2,000

Accumulated depreciation (160)

Total assets \)4,090

Liabilities

Bonds payable (net of discount) \(1,426

Stockholders’ equity

Common stock 1,500

Retained earnings 1,164

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity \)4,090

Note X: Long Term Debt:

On January 1, 2016, Bugant issued bonds with face value of \(1,500 and a coupon rate equal to 10%. The bonds were issued to yield 12% and mature on January 1, 2021.

Additional information concerning 2018 is as follows.

  1. Sales were \)3,500, all for cash.
  2. Purchases were \(2,000, all paid in cash.
  3. Salaries were \)700, all paid in cash.
  4. Property, plant, and equipment was originally purchased for \(2,000 and is depreciated straight-line over a 25-year life with no salvage value.
  5. Ending inventory was \)1,900.
  6. Cash dividends of \(100 were declared and paid by Bugant.
  7. Ignore taxes.
  8. The market rate of interest on bonds of similar risk was 12% during all of 2018.
  9. Interest on the bonds is paid semiannually each June 30 and December 31.

Accounting

Prepare a balance sheet for Bugant, Inc. at December 31, 2018, and an income statement for the year ending December 31, 2018. Assume semiannual compounding of the bond interest.

Analysis

Use common ratios for analysis of long-term debt to assess Bugant’s long-run solvency. Has Bugant’s solvency changed much from 2017 to 2018? Bugant’s net income in 2017 was \)550 and interest expense was $169.

Principles

The FASB and the IASB allow companies the option of recognizing in their financial statements the fair values of their long-term debt. That is, companies have the option to change the balance sheet value of their long-term debt to the debt’s fair value and report the change in balance sheet value as a gain or loss in income. In terms of the qualitative characteristics of accounting information (Chapter 2), briefly describe the potential trade-off(s) involved in reporting long-term debt at its fair value.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Business Studies Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free