Accounting, Analysis, and Principles

Englehart Company sells two types of pumps. One is large and is for commercial use. The other is smaller and is used in residentialswimming pools. The following inventory data is available for the month of March.

Price per

Units Unit Total

Residential Pumps

Inventory at Feb. 28: 200 \( 400 \) 80,000

Purchases:

March 10 500 \( 450 \)225,000

March 20 400 \( 475 \)190,000

March 30 300 \( 500 \)150,000

Sales:

March 15 500 \( 540 \)270,000

March 25 400 \( 570 \)228,000

Inventory at March 31: 500

Commercial Pumps

Inventory at Feb. 28: 600 \( 800 \)480,000

Purchases:

March 3 600 \( 900 \)540,000

March 12 300 \( 950 \)285,000

March 21 500 \(1,000 \)500,000

Sales:

March 18 900 \(1,080 \)972,000

March 29 600 \(1,140 \)684,000

Inventory at March 31: 500

Accounting

(a) Assuming Englehart uses a periodic inventory system, determine the cost of inventory on hand at March 31 and thecost of goods sold for March under first-in, first-out (FIFO).

(b) Assume Englehart uses dollar-value LIFO and one pool, consisting of the combination of residential and commercialpumps. Determine the cost of inventory on hand at March 31 and the cost of goods sold for March. Assume Englehart’sinitial adoption of LIFO is on March 1. Use the double-extension method to determine the appropriate price indices.

(Hint:The price index for February 28/March 1 should be 1.00.) (Round the index to three decimal places.)

Analysis

(a) Assume you need to compute a current ratio for Englehart. Which inventory method (FIFO or dollar-value LIFO) doyou think would give you a more meaningful current ratio?

(b) Some of Englehart’s competitors use LIFO inventory costing and some use FIFO. How can an analyst compare theresults of companies in an industry, when some use LIFO and others use FIFO?

Principles

Can companies change from one inventory accounting method to another? If a company changes to an inventory accounting methodused by most of its competitors, what are the trade-offs in terms of the conceptual framework discussed in Chapter 2 of the textbook?

Short Answer

Expert verified

Under Periodic system

Ending inventory $745,000

COGS $1,705,000

Under dollar value LIFO

Ending inventory$745,200

COGS $1,704,800

The FIFO method is most preferred in analyzing financial performance, and there can be a change in the inventory method with a cost-benefit trade-off.

Step by step solution

01

Accounting

a. Ending Inventory and COGS using the periodic inventory

Under the periodic inventory system, the inventory received first is utilized first. Thus the ending inventory would always be valued at the cost of the earliest inventory received.

In this case,

The cost of ending inventory for Residential pumps are as follow –

Ending inventory = 500 units

Date

Units

Cost per unit

Amount

March 30

300

$500

$150,000

March 20

200

$475

$95,000

Total

$245,000

Costofgoodssold(forresedentialpumps)=Costofopeninginventory+Costofallpurchases-Costofendinginventory=$80,000+($225,000+$190,000+$150,000)-$245,000=$400,000

The cost of ending inventory for Commercial pumps is as follows–

Ending inventory = 500 units

Date

Units

Cost per unit

Amount

March 21

500

$1000

$500,000

Total

$500,000

Costofgoodssold(forcommercialpumps)=Costofopeninginventory+Costofallpurchases-Costofendinginventory=$480,000+($540,000+$285,000+$500,000)-$500,000=$1,305,000Totalcostofendinginventory=Costofendinginventoryofresedentialpumps+CostofendinginventoryofCommercialpumps=$245,000+$500,000=$745,000Totalcostofgoodssold=Costofgoodssoldforresedentialpumps+Costofgoodssoldforcommercialpumps=$400,000+$1,305,000=$1,705,000

Total ending inventory under the periodic method comes out to be $745,000, and the total cost of goods sold amounts to $1,705,000.

b) Ending Inventory and COGS using dollar-value LIFO under one pool

Under the dollar-value LIFO inventory system, the layers of inventory at base cost added every year are converted to current cost using the price index. The sum of all layers at the current cost is the cost of ending inventory.

In this case, the cost of ending inventory and COGS using one pool would be as follows –

Ending inventory

Date

Units

Current year cost

Amount

Base year cost

Amount

Residential pumps

March 30

300

$500

$150,000

$400

$120,000

March 20

200

$475

$95,000

$400

$80,000

Commercial pumps

March 21

500

$1000

$500,000

$800

$400,000

Total

$745,000

$600,000

PriceIndex=EndinginventorycostatcurrentyearpriceEndinginventorycostatbaseyearprice=$745,000$600,000=1.242

Valuation of ending inventory using dollar-value LIFO

Date

Inventory at base price

Layer

X

Price Index

=

Dollar Value LIFO

1 March

$560,000

$560,000

X

1.242

=

$695,520

31 March

$600,000

$40,000

X

1.242

=

$49,680

Total

$745,200

Costofgoodssold=Totalopeninginevntory+Totalpurchases-EndinginventoryusinfdollarvalueLIFO=($80,000+$480,000)+($225,000+$190,000+$150,000+$540,000+$285,000+$500,000)-$745,200=$560,000+$1,890,000-$745,200=$1,704,800

The cost of goods sold and ending inventory using dollar-value LIFO comes out to be $1,704,800 and $745,200, respectively.

02

Analysis

a) FIFO vs. dollar-value LIFO in computing current ratio

In computing, the current ratio, one of the factors affecting the ratio, is the ending inventory. There are several methods for computing ending inventory that yields different results.

Under the FIFO method, ending inventory is completed at the earliest cost, while under dollar value LIFO, ending inventory is computed at the current price using a price index. In both methods, there remains a difference in amount.

The ending inventory under both methods is almost the same in the given case. However, the FIFO method would be the most preferred method as this method is quite simple and reasonable in computing the ending inventory. Furthermore, the inventory is calculated at the original cost than at the price index value in this method.

So, the preferred method for computing the current ratio would be the FIFO method.

b) Comparing the results under FIFO and LIFO

Under FIFO and LIFO methods, ending inventory is computed at a different rate. So there remains a difference between the FIFO and LIFO methods. But this difference can be reconciled using the LIFO reverse account. LIFO reverse is the difference between the FIFO ending inventory and the LIFO ending inventory.

Using this account, an analyst can compare the results under both methods.

03

Principles

Yes, a company can change from one inventory method to another with the condition that there should be consistency for the long term. There should not be a frequent change in the inventory method, and there should be full disclosure about the change.

In changing the inventory method, the trade-off in terms of the conceptual framework can be matching principle and cost constrain. A company may lose or gain some inventory value by changing the method. This gain or loss must be matched with the current income, and the cost-benefit trade-off should be properly reported.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Question:Data for Amsterdam Company are presented in BE8-4. Compute the April 30 inventory and the April cost of goods sold using the LIFO method.

On December 31, 2016, the inventory of Powhattan Company amounts to \(800,000. During 2017, the company decides to use the dollar-value LIFO method of costing inventories. On December 31, 2017, the inventory is \)1,053,000 at December 31, 2017, prices. Using the December 31, 2016, price level of 100 and the December 31, 2017, price level of 108, compute the inventory value at December 31, 2017, under the dollar-value LIFO method.

Case 1: T J International

T J International was founded in 1969 as Trus Joist International. The firm, a manufacturer of specialty building products, has its headquarters in Boise, Idaho. The company, through its partnership in the Trus Joist MacMillan joint venture, develops and manufactures engineered lumber. This product is a high-quality substitute for structural lumber and uses lower-grade wood and materials formerly considered waste. The company also is majority owner of the Outlook Window Partnership, which is a consortium of three wood and vinyl window manufacturers.

Following is T J International’s adapted income statement and information concerning inventories from its annual report.

T J International

Sales \(618,876,000

Cost of goods sold 475,476,000

Gross profit 143,400,000

Selling and administrative expenses 102,112,000

Income from operations 41,288,000

Other expense 24,712,000

Income before income tax 16,576,000

Income taxes 7,728,000

Net income \) 8,848,000

Inventories.Inventories are valued at the lower of cost or market and include material, labor, and production overhead costs. Inventories consisted of the following:

Current Year Prior Year

Finished goods \(27,512,000 \)23,830,000

Raw materials and

work-in-progress 34,363,00033,244,000

61,875,000 57,074,000

Reduction to LIFO cost (5,263,000) (3,993,000)

\(56,612,000 \)53,081,000

The last-in, first-out (LIFO) method is used for determining the cost of lumber, veneer, Microllamlumber, TJI joists, and open web joists. Approximately 35 percent of total inventories at the end of the current year were valued using the LIFO method. The first-in, first-out (FIFO) method is used to determine the cost of all other inventories.

Instructions

(a) How much would income before taxes have been if FIFO costing had been used to value all inventories?

(b) If the income tax rate is 46.6%, what would income tax have been if FIFO costing had been used to value all inventories ? In your opinion, is this difference in net income between the two methods material? Explain.

(c) Does the use of a different costing system for different types of inventory mean that there is a different physical flow of goods among the different types of inventory? Explain.

Specific identification is sometimes said to be the ideal method of assigning a cost to inventory and to the cost of goods sold. Briefly indicate the arguments for and againstthis method of inventory valuation.

Fong Sai-Yuk Company sells one product. Presented below is information for January for Fong Sai-Yuk Company.

Jan. 1 Inventory 100 units at \(5 each

4 Sale 80 units at \)8 each

11 Purchase 150 units at \(6 each

13 Sale 120 units at \)8.75 each

20 Purchase 160 units at \(7 each

27 Sale 100 units at \)9 each

Fong Sai-Yuk uses the FIFO cost flow assumption. All purchases and sales are on account.

Instructions

(a) Assume Fong Sai-Yuk uses a periodic system. Prepare all necessary journal entries, including the end-of-month closingentry to record cost of goods sold. A physical count indicates that the ending inventory for January is 110 units.

(b) Compute gross profit using the periodic system.

(c) Assume Fong Sai-Yuk uses a perpetual system. Prepare all necessary journal entries.

(d) Compute gross profit using the perpetual system.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Business Studies Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free