Chapter 8: Problem 11
Why are some bonds ionic and some covalent?
Chapter 8: Problem 11
Why are some bonds ionic and some covalent?
All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.
Get started for freeNitrous oxide \(\left(\mathrm{N}_{2} \mathrm{O}\right)\) has three possible Lewis structures: $$: \mathrm{N}=\mathrm{N}=\dot{\mathrm{O}}\longleftrightarrow: \mathrm{N} \equiv \mathrm{N}-\ddot{\mathrm{Q}} : \longleftrightarrow : \dot{\mathrm{N}}-\mathrm{N} \equiv \mathrm{O}$$ Given the following bond lengths, $\mathrm{N}-\mathrm{N} \qquad 167 \mathrm{pm} \quad \mathrm{N}=\mathrm{O} \quad 115 \mathrm{pm}$ $\mathrm{N}=\mathrm{N} \qquad 120 \mathrm{pm} \quad \mathrm{N}-\mathrm{O} \quad 147 \mathrm{pm}$ \(\mathrm{N} \equiv \mathrm{N} \quad 110 \mathrm{pm}\) rationalize the observations that the N-N bond length in $\mathrm{N}_{2} \mathrm{O}\( is 112 \)\mathrm{pm}\( and that the \)\mathrm{N}-\mathrm{O}$ bond length is 119 \(\mathrm{pm}\) . Assign formal charges to the resonance structures for \(\mathrm{N}_{2} \mathrm{O}\) . Can you eliminate any of the resonance structures on the basis of formal charges? Is this consistent with observation?
Without using Fig. 8.3, predict the order of increasing electronegativity in each of the following groups of elements. a. \(\mathrm{Na}, \mathrm{K}, \mathrm{Rb} \quad\) c. $\mathrm{F}, \mathrm{Cl}, \mathrm{Br}$ b. \(\mathrm{B}, \mathrm{O}, \mathrm{Ga} \qquad\) d. $\mathrm{S}, \mathrm{O}, \mathrm{F}$
Use bond energies (Table \(8.5 ),\) values of electron affinities (Table 7.7\()\) , and the ionization energy of hydrogen \((1312 \mathrm{kJ} / \mathrm{mol})\) to estimate \(\Delta H\) for each of the following reactions. a. \(\mathrm{HF}(g) \rightarrow \mathrm{H}^{+}(g)+\mathrm{F}^{-}(g)\) b. \(\mathrm{HCl}(g) \rightarrow \mathrm{H}^{+}(g)+\mathrm{Cl}^{-}(g)\) c. \(\mathrm{HI}(g) \rightarrow \mathrm{H}^{+}(g)+\mathrm{I}^{-}(g)\) d. $\mathrm{H}_{2} \mathrm{O}(g) \rightarrow \mathrm{H}^{+}(g)+\mathrm{OH}^{-}(g)$
In general, the higher the charge on the ions in an ionic compound, the more favorable the lattice energy. Why do some stable ionic compounds have \(+1\) charged ions even though \(+4,+5,\) and \(+6\) charged ions would have a more favorable lattice energy?
The molecules $\mathrm{BF}_{3}, \mathrm{CF}_{4}, \mathrm{CO}_{2}, \mathrm{PF}_{5},\( and \)\mathrm{SF}_{6}$ are all nonpolar, even though they contain polar bonds. Why?
What do you think about this solution?
We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.