Combustion reactions of fossil fuels provide most of the energy needs of the world. Why are combustion reactions of fossil fuels so exothermic?

Short Answer

Expert verified
The combustion reactions of fossil fuels are exothermic because the energy released during the formation of new CO2 and H2O bonds is greater than the energy required to break the original carbon, hydrogen, and oxygen bonds. This excess energy is released as heat, making the reaction exothermic. The energy released in the form of heat during combustion reactions drives various processes such as generating electricity in power plants and providing heat for our homes and vehicles.

Step by step solution

01

Understand fossil fuels

Fossil fuels are hydrocarbon compounds that have formed over millions of years from the remains of plants and animals. They include coal, oil, and natural gas and contain a high amount of chemical energy stored in their bonds.
02

Understand exothermic reactions

An exothermic reaction is a chemical reaction that releases energy (mostly in the form of heat) into the surrounding environment. These reactions occur when the energy stored in the bonds of the reactants is greater than the energy stored in the bonds of the products.
03

Combustion reactions

Combustion is a type of chemical reaction that occurs between a fuel (usually a hydrocarbon) and an oxidizing agent (usually oxygen from the air), releasing heat and producing products such as carbon dioxide and water.
04

Energy changes during combustion

In the combustion of fossil fuels, the carbon and hydrogen atoms present in the fuel combine with oxygen from the air to form carbon dioxide (CO2) and water (H2O). This process involves breaking the chemical bonds between carbon, hydrogen, and oxygen and forming new bonds in the CO2 and H2O molecules.
05

Explain why combustion reactions are exothermic

The combustion reactions of fossil fuels are exothermic because the energy released during the formation of new CO2 and H2O bonds is greater than the energy required to break the original carbon, hydrogen, and oxygen bonds. This excess energy is released as heat, making the reaction exothermic. The energy released in the form of heat during combustion reactions drives various processes such as generating electricity in power plants and providing heat for our homes and vehicles. In conclusion, combustion reactions of fossil fuels are exothermic because the formation of new chemical bonds in the products (CO2 and H2O) releases more energy than the energy required to break the initial bonds in the reactants (carbon and hydrogen in the fuel and oxygen in the air).

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

When molten sulfur reacts with chlorine gas, a vile-smelling orange liquid forms that has an empirical formula of SCl. The structure of this compound has a formal charge of zero on all elements in the compound. Draw the Lewis structure for the vile-smelling orange liquid.

Think of forming an ionic compound as three steps (this is a simplification, as with all models): (1) removing an electron from the metal; (2) adding an electron to the nonmetal; and (3) allowing the metal cation and nonmetal anion to come together. a. What is the sign of the energy change for each of these three processes? b. In general, what is the sign of the sum of the first two processes? Use examples to support your answer. c. What must be the sign of the sum of the three processes? d. Given your answer to part c, why do ionic bonds occur? e. Given your above explanations, why is NaCl stable but not $\mathrm{Na}_{2} \mathrm{Cl} ? \mathrm{NaCl}_{2} ?$ What about MgO compared to \(\mathrm{MgO}_{2} ? \mathrm{Mg}_{2} \mathrm{O} ?\)

For each of the following groups, place the atoms and/or ions in order of decreasing size. a. \(\mathrm{Cu}, \mathrm{Cu}^{+}, \mathrm{Cu}^{2+}\) b. \(\mathrm{Ni}^{2+}, \mathrm{Pd}^{2+}, \mathrm{Pt}^{2+}\) c. \(\mathrm{O}, \mathrm{O}^{-}, \mathrm{O}^{2-}\) d. \(\mathrm{La}^{3+}, \mathrm{Eu}^{3+}, \mathrm{Gd}^{3+}, \mathrm{Yb}^{3+}\) e. $\mathrm{Te}^{2-}, \mathrm{I}^{-}, \mathrm{Cs}^{+}, \mathrm{Ba}^{2+}, \mathrm{La}^{3+}$

Without using Fig. 8.3, predict the order of increasing electronegativity in each of the following groups of elements. a. \(\mathrm{C}, \mathrm{N}, \mathrm{O} \quad\) c. $\mathrm{Si}, \mathrm{Ge}, \mathrm{Sn}$ b. \(\mathrm{S}, \mathrm{Se}, \mathrm{Cl} \quad\) d. $\mathrm{TI}, \mathrm{S}, \mathrm{Ge}$

In general, the higher the charge on the ions in an ionic compound, the more favorable the lattice energy. Why do some stable ionic compounds have \(+1\) charged ions even though \(+4,+5,\) and \(+6\) charged ions would have a more favorable lattice energy?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Chemistry Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free