Compare and contrast bonding molecular orbitals with antibonding molecular orbitals.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Bonding molecular orbitals are formed by constructive interference of atomic orbitals with same-sign wave functions, resulting in high electron density and stable chemical bonds. They have lower energy levels than their associated atomic orbitals. In contrast, antibonding molecular orbitals are formed by destructive interference of atomic orbitals with opposite-sign wave functions, leading to low electron density and potential bond weakening or breaking. They have higher energy levels than the atomic orbitals they originate from. Stability of a molecule is determined by comparing the number of electrons in the bonding and antibonding molecular orbitals using bond order formula. A positive bond order indicates stability, while a negative or zero bond order suggests instability.

Step by step solution

01

Introduction to Molecular Orbitals

Molecular orbitals are formed by the overlap of atomic orbitals from different atoms in a molecule. These orbitals can be classified into two types: bonding molecular orbitals and antibonding molecular orbitals. Both types of orbitals play a crucial role in determining the stability and properties of molecules. In this breakdown, we will compare and contrast these two types of molecular orbitals by discussing their formation, energy levels, electron occupancy, and effects on the stability of molecules.
02

Formation of Molecular Orbitals

Bonding molecular orbitals are formed by the constructive interference of atomic orbitals, which means that their wave functions have the same sign when they overlap. This results in a region of high electron density between the nuclei of the atoms, which helps to hold the atoms together and create a chemical bond. Antibonding molecular orbitals, on the other hand, are formed by the destructive interference of atomic orbitals, meaning that their wave functions have opposite signs when they overlap. This results in a region of low electron density between the nuclei, which can lead to the weakening or even breaking of chemical bonds.
03

Energy Levels of Molecular Orbitals

Bonding molecular orbitals have lower energy levels than the atomic orbitals they are formed from. This means that electrons occupying these orbitals are more stable and have lower energy compared to the electrons in the individual atomic orbitals. Antibonding molecular orbitals have higher energy levels than the atomic orbitals they are formed from, meaning that electrons occupying these orbitals are less stable and have higher energy compared to the electrons in the individual atomic orbitals. In general, the energy difference between bonding and antibonding molecular orbitals is referred to as the energy gap.
04

Electron Occupancy and Stability

Generally, electrons will occupy orbitals in increasing order of their energy levels. This means that bonding molecular orbitals will be filled before antibonding molecular orbitals for a stable molecule. When the number of electrons in bonding molecular orbitals is more significant than those in the antibonding molecular orbitals, the overall molecule is considered stable. However, if the number of electrons in antibonding molecular orbitals becomes higher, the molecule loses its stability and can be less likely to form or may dissociate.
05

Comparison of Stability and Bonding

The stability of a molecule can be determined by comparing the number of electrons in bonding and antibonding molecular orbitals. A higher number of electrons in bonding molecular orbitals contributes to the formation of stronger and more stable chemical bonds. Conversely, a higher number of electrons in antibonding molecular orbitals can lead to the weakening or breaking of chemical bonds, resulting in less stable or unstable molecules. To assess the overall stability, we can use the bond order formula: Bond order = (number of electrons in bonding orbitals - number of electrons in antibonding orbitals) / 2. A positive bond order indicates stability, while a negative or zero bond order suggests instability. In summary, bonding molecular orbitals are formed by the constructive interference of atomic orbitals and have lower energy levels, resulting in stable chemical bonds. Antibonding molecular orbitals are formed by the destructive interference of atomic orbitals and have higher energy levels, potentially leading to bond weakening or breaking. Comparing the number of electrons in bonding and antibonding molecular orbitals can help determine the stability of a molecule.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

In terms of the molecular orbital model, which species in each of the following two pairs will most likely be the one to gain an electron? Explain. $$ \text {a} C N \text { or } N O \qquad \text { b. } O_{2}^{2+} \text { or } N_{2}^{2+} $$

In Exercise 95 in Chapter 8 , the Lewis structures for benzene \(\left(\mathrm{C}_{6} \mathrm{H}_{6}\right)\) were drawn. Using one of the Lewis structures, estimate \(\Delta H_{\mathrm{f}}^{\circ}\) for $\mathrm{C}_{6} \mathrm{H}_{6}(g)$ using bond energies and given that the standard enthalpy of formation of \(\mathrm{C}(g)\) is 717 $\mathrm{kJ} / \mathrm{mol}$ . The experimental \(\Delta H_{\mathrm{f}}^{\circ}\) value of $\mathrm{C}_{6} \mathrm{H}_{6}(g)\( is 83 \)\mathrm{kJ} / \mathrm{mol} .$ Explain the discrepancy between the experimental value and the calculated $\Delta H_{\mathrm{f}}^{\circ}\( value for \)\mathrm{C}_{6} \mathrm{H}_{6}(g)$

Do lone pairs about a central atom affect the hybridization of the central atom? If so, how?

Consider three molecules: A, \(\mathrm{B},\) and \(\mathrm{C}\) . Molecule \(\mathrm{A}\) has a hybridization of \(s p^{3} .\) Molecule \(\mathrm{B}\) has two more effective pairs (electron pairs around the central atom) than molecule A. Molecule C consists of two \(\sigma\) bonds and two \(\pi\) bonds. Give the molecular structure, hybridization, bond angles, and an example for each molecule.

Why does the molecular orbital model do a better job in explaining the bonding in \(\mathrm{NO}^{-}\) and \(\mathrm{NO}\) the hybrid orbital model?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Chemistry Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free