When using a Geiger-Müller counter to measure radioactivity, it is necessary to maintain the same geometrical orientation between the sample and the Geiger-Müller tube to compare different measurements. Why?

Short Answer

Expert verified
Maintaining the same geometrical orientation between the sample and the Geiger-Müller tube when measuring radioactivity is important because it ensures consistent solid angle of detection, absorption and scattering of radiation, and counting efficiency. Accurate comparisons between measurements require consistency in these factors, and maintaining the same orientation provides this consistency, allowing for reliable analysis of radioactivity levels.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding the basic concept of Geiger-Müller counter

A Geiger-Müller counter measures radiation by detecting and counting particle events. The device consists of a Geiger-Müller tube filled with gas and a high-voltage wire. When radiation enters the tube, it ionizes the gas, creating a pulse of electric current. The number of pulses over a certain period represents the intensity of the radiation.
02

Solid angle of detection

To accurately compare different measurements, the solid angle subtended by the Geiger-Müller tube must remain constant. The solid angle determines the amount of radiation that can enter the tube and be detected. If the geometrical orientation between the sample and the tube changes, the solid angle of detection will change as well, leading to inconsistency in the measurements.
03

Absorption and scattering of radiation

The geometrical orientation between the sample and the Geiger-Müller tube significantly affects the absorption and scattering of radiation. Different orientations may result in different paths that the radiation takes to reach the tube, causing variations in the amount of radiation that is absorbed and scattered by the surrounding materials. To obtain consistent and comparable results, it is essential to maintain the same geometrical orientation between the sample and the tube.
04

Counting efficiency

The counting efficiency of a Geiger-Müller counter is dependent on the geometrical orientation between the sample and the tube. If the orientation changes, the device may detect a different portion of the emitted radiation, which can lead to variations in the measured count rates. By maintaining a constant geometrical orientation between the sample and the tube, the counting efficiency remains consistent, ensuring accurate comparison between different measurements.
05

Conclusion

In conclusion, maintaining the same geometrical orientation between the sample and the Geiger-Müller tube is crucial for obtaining accurate and consistent measurements when comparing radioactivity levels. This ensures that the solid angle of detection, absorption and scattering of radiation, and counting efficiency remain consistent across different measurements. By doing so, researchers can reliably compare and analyze the collected data.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Much of the research on controlled fusion focuses on the problem of how to contain the reacting material. Magnetic fields appear to be the most promising mode of containment. Why is containment such a problem? Why must one resort to magnetic fields for containment?

Radioactive cobalt- 60 is used to study defects in vitamin \(\mathrm{B}_{12}\) absorption because cobalt is the metallic atom at the center of the vitamin \(\mathrm{B}_{12}\) molecule. The nuclear synthesis of this cobalt isotope involves a three-step process. The overall reaction is iron58 reacting with two neutrons to produce cobalt-60 along with the emission of another particle. What particle is emitted in this nuclear synthesis? What is the binding energy in J per nucleon for the cobalt-60 nucleus (atomic masses: \({ }^{60} \mathrm{Co}=59.9338\) amu; \({ }^{1} \mathrm{H}=1.00782\) amu \()\) ? What is the de Broglie wavelength of the emitted particle if it has a velocity equal to \(0.90 c\) where \(c\) is the speed of light?

Consider the following reaction to produce methyl acetate: When this reaction is carried out with \(\mathrm{CH}_{3} \mathrm{OH}\) containing oxygen18, the water produced does not contain oxygen-18. Explain.

The easiest fusion reaction to initiate is $${ }_{1}^{2} \mathrm{H}+{ }_{1}^{3} \mathrm{H} \longrightarrow{ }_{2}^{4} \mathrm{He}+{ }_{0}^{1} \mathrm{n}$$ Calculate the energy released per \({ }_{2}^{4} \mathrm{He}\) nucleus produced and per mole of \({ }_{2}^{4}\) He produced. The atomic masses are \({ }_{1}^{2} \mathrm{H}, 2.01410 ;{ }_{1}^{3} \mathrm{H}\), \(3.01605\); and \({ }_{2}^{4}\) He, \(4.00260\). The masses of the electron and neutron are \(5.4858 \times 10^{-4}\) amu and \(1.00866\) amu, respectively.

Which do you think would be the greater health hazard: the release of a radioactive nuclide of Sr or a radioactive nuclide of Xe into the environment? Assume the amount of radioactivity is the same in each case. Explain your answer on the basis of the chemical properties of \(\mathrm{Sr}\) and Xe. Why are the chemical properties of a radioactive substance important in assessing its potential health hazards?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Chemistry Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free