Which do you think would be the greater health hazard: the release of a radioactive nuclide of Sr or a radioactive nuclide of Xe into the environment? Assume the amount of radioactivity is the same in each case. Explain your answer on the basis of the chemical properties of \(\mathrm{Sr}\) and Xe. Why are the chemical properties of a radioactive substance important in assessing its potential health hazards?

Short Answer

Expert verified
The release of a radioactive nuclide of Strontium (Sr) would pose a greater health hazard than that of Xenon (Xe). Sr is chemically reactive and has biological importance, being able to accumulate in living organisms, specifically in the human body where it can replace calcium and emit ionizing radiation, causing damage to bone tissues and nearby cells. Xe, being a noble gas, is chemically inert and has no known biological activity, making it less likely to enter, interact with, or accumulate in living organisms, and therefore less likely to cause harm. Chemical properties are crucial for assessing potential health hazards, as they determine how a radioactive substance interacts with its environment and living organisms.

Step by step solution

01

Overview of Strontium and Xenon Chemical Properties

Strontium (Sr) is an alkaline earth metal, which is a group 2 element in the periodic table. It is chemically very reactive and forms a wide range of compounds with other elements. Sr is also known to have biological importance, as it can be absorbed and utilized in biological systems, such as the human body. Its chemical behavior is similar to calcium (Ca), hence it can easily replace Ca in many biological processes. On the other hand, Xenon (Xe) is a noble gas, which is a group 18 element in the periodic table. It is chemically inert, meaning it is very stable and rarely forms compounds with other elements. As a result, Xe has little to no biological activity and doesn't interact with or affect biological processes in living organisms.
02

Chemical Properties Related to Health Hazards

The chemical properties of Sr make it more likely to enter, interact with, and accumulate in living organisms, as it can easily form compounds and participate in biological processes, specifically in the human body. When Sr nuclides enter the human body – for example, via ingestion or inhalation – they can be absorbed and integrated into bones, replacing calcium. The radioactive Sr nuclides can then emit ionizing radiation, potentially causing damage to the bone tissues and nearby cells, leading or contributing to various health problems. On the contrary, Xe, being a chemically inert, non-reactive gas, will not form compounds with other elements and has no known biological activity in living organisms. When radioactive Xe nuclides are released into the environment, they are less likely to enter, interact with, or accumulate in living organisms. Even if Xe nuclides enter the human body – for example, as a result of inhalation – they will not chemically interact with tissues or cell components and will likely be exhaled soon without causing significant harm.
03

Comparing Potential Health Hazards

Considering the chemical properties of Sr and Xe, we can conclude that the release of a radioactive nuclide of Sr poses a more significant health hazard compared to a radioactive nuclide of Xe. This is because Sr can chemically interact with biological processes and accumulate in living organisms, particularly in the human body, whereas Xe is chemically inert and less likely to cause any harm due to its non-reactive nature.
04

Importance of Chemical Properties for Assessing Health Hazards

The chemical properties of a radioactive substance are crucial for assessing its potential health hazards because they determine how the substance will interact with its environment, specifically with living organisms. By examining the reactivity, bonding characteristics, and biological activity of a radioactive substance, we can better predict its behavior in the environment and potential impact on health. For instance, a reactive substance that forms compounds easily is more likely to enter and accumulate in living organisms than a stable, inert substance. This means that the reactive substance poses a greater risk to living organisms, as its emitted ionizing radiation is more likely to cause damage to biological tissues and cells.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Strontium-90 and radon-222 both pose serious health risks. \({ }^{90} \mathrm{Sr}\) decays by \(\beta\) -particle production and has a relatively long half-life (28.9 years). Radon- 222 decays by \(\alpha\) -particle production and has a relatively short half-life (3.82 days). Explain why each decay process poses health risks.

Consider the following information: i. The layer of dead skin on our bodies is sufficient to protect us from most \(\alpha\) -particle radiation. ii. Plutonium is an \(\alpha\) -particle producer. iii. The chemistry of \(\mathrm{Pu}^{4+}\) is similar to that of \(\mathrm{Fe}^{3+}\). iv. Pu oxidizes readily to \(\mathrm{Pu}^{4+}\). Why is plutonium one of the most toxic substances known?

The curie (Ci) is a commonly used unit for measuring nuclear radioactivity: 1 curie of radiation is equal to \(3.7 \times 10^{10}\) decay events per second (the number of decay events from \(1 \mathrm{~g}\) radium in \(1 \mathrm{~s}\) ). A \(1.7-\mathrm{mL}\) sample of water containing tritium was injected into a \(150-\mathrm{lb}\) person. The total activity of radiation injected was \(86.5 \mathrm{mCi}\). After some time to allow the tritium activity to equally distribute throughout the body, a sample of blood plasma containing \(2.0 \mathrm{~mL}\) water at an activity of \(3.6 \mu \mathrm{Ci}\) was removed. From these data, calculate the mass percent of water in this \(150-\mathrm{lb}\) person.

Each of the following isotopes has been used medically for the purpose indicated. Suggest reasons why the particular element might have been chosen for this purpose. a. cobalt-57, for study of the body's use of vitamin \(\mathrm{B}_{12}\) b. calcium- 47 , for study of bone metabolism c. iron- 59 , for study of red blood cell function

Breeder reactors are used to convert the nonfissionable nuclide \({ }_{92}^{238} \mathrm{U}\) to a fissionable product. Neutron capture of the \({ }_{92}^{238} \mathrm{U}\) is followed by two successive beta decays. What is the final fissionable product?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Chemistry Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free