Does a photon of visible light \((\lambda \approx 400\) to \(700 \mathrm{~nm})\) have sufficient energy to excite an electron in a hydrogen atom from the \(n=1\) to the \(n=5\) energy state? from the \(n=2\) to the \(n=6\) energy state?

Short Answer

Expert verified
A photon of visible light has an energy range of 1.77 eV to 3.10 eV. To excite an electron in a hydrogen atom from the \(n=1\) to the \(n=5\) energy state, an energy of 13.056 eV is required, which is beyond the energy range of visible light photons. Therefore, visible light photons do not have sufficient energy to excite an electron from the \(n=1\) to the \(n=5\) energy state. On the other hand, to excite an electron from the \(n=2\) to the \(n=6\) energy state, an energy of 3.022 eV is needed. This value is close to the maximum energy of visible light photons (3.10 eV). Hence, while the majority of visible light photons may not have enough energy to cause the excitation, a small fraction of high-energy visible light photons might have sufficient energy for the \(n=2\) to \(n=6\) transition.

Step by step solution

01

Determine the energy difference between the initial and final states for each case

Using the formula for the energy of an electron in a hydrogen atom, we can find the energy difference between the initial and final states: Energy of an electron in a hydrogen atom, \(E_n\), can be found using the formula: \[E_n = -\frac{13.6 \mathrm{~eV}}{n^2}\] For the first case, \(n_i = 1\) and \(n_f = 5\): \[E_1 = -\frac{13.6}{1^2} = -13.6 \mathrm{~eV}\] \[E_5 = -\frac{13.6}{5^2} = -0.544 \mathrm{~eV}\] \[\Delta E_{1 \rightarrow 5} = E_5 - E_1 = 13.056 \mathrm{~eV}\] For the second case, \(n_i = 2\) and \(n_f = 6\): \[E_2 = -\frac{13.6}{2^2} = -3.4 \mathrm{~eV}\] \[E_6 = -\frac{13.6}{6^2} = -0.378 \mathrm{~eV}\] \[\Delta E_{2 \rightarrow 6} = E_6 - E_2 = 3.022 \mathrm{~eV}\]
02

Determine the energy range of a photon of visible light

A photon's energy can be found using the formula: \[E_{photon} = \frac{hc}{\lambda}\] Where \(h\) is Planck's constant, \(6.626 \times 10^{-34} \mathrm{J\cdot s}\), \(c\) is the speed of light, \(3 \times 10^8 \mathrm{m/s}\), and \(\lambda\) is the wavelength of the photon. Since we're dealing with visible light and we are given limits on its wavelength, we can determine the energy range: \[E_{photon, min} = \frac{hc}{700 \times 10^{-9} \mathrm{m}} = 2.849 \times 10^{-19} \mathrm{J}\] \[E_{photon, max} = \frac{hc}{400 \times 10^{-9} \mathrm{m}} = 4.977 \times 10^{-19} \mathrm{J}\] We can convert these energies to electron volts (eV): \[E_{photon, min} = 1.77 \mathrm{~eV}\] \[E_{photon, max} = 3.10 \mathrm{~eV}\]
03

Compare the energy difference with the energy range of visible light photons

Now we simply compare the energy differences in each case with the energy range of visible light photons: For the first case, from \(n=1\) to \(n=5\), \(\Delta E_{1 \rightarrow 5} = 13.056 \mathrm{~eV}\). Since this value is larger than both \(E_{photon, min}\) and \(E_{photon, max}\), a photon of visible light does not have sufficient energy to excite an electron from the \(n=1\) to the \(n=5\) energy state. For the second case, from \(n=2\) to \(n=6\), \(\Delta E_{2 \rightarrow 6} = 3.022 \mathrm{~eV}\). This value is extremely close to the maximum energy of visible light photons, \(E_{photon, max} = 3.10 \mathrm{~eV}\). While it may not be possible for the majority of visible light photons to excite an electron from the \(n=2\) to \(n=6\) energy state, there could be a small fraction of high-energy visible light photons that might have sufficient energy to cause the excitation.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Which of the following orbital designations are incorrect: \(1 s\), \(1 p, 7 d, 9 s, 3 f, 4 f, 2 d ?\)

In each of the following sets, which atom or ion has the smallest radius? a. \(\mathrm{H}, \mathrm{He}\) b. \(\mathrm{Cl}, \mathrm{In}, \mathrm{Se}\) c. element 120, element 119, element 116 d. \(\mathrm{Nb}, \mathrm{Zn}, \mathrm{Si}\) e. \(\mathrm{Na}^{-}, \mathrm{Na}, \mathrm{Na}^{+}\)

One bit of evidence that the quantum mechanical model is "correct" lies in the magnetic properties of matter. Atoms with unpaired electrons are attracted by magnetic fields and thus are said to exhibit paramagnetism. The degree to which this effect is observed is directly related to the number of unpaired electrons present in the atom. Consider the ground-state electron configurations for \(\mathrm{Li}, \mathrm{N}, \mathrm{Ni}, \mathrm{Te}, \mathrm{Ba}\), and \(\mathrm{Hg} .\) Which of these atoms would be expected to be paramagnetic, and how many unpaired electrons are present in each paramagnetic atom?

Identify the following three elements. a. The ground-state electron configuration is \([\mathrm{Kr}] 5 s^{2} 4 d^{10} 5 p^{4}\). b. The ground-state electron configuration is \([\mathrm{Ar}] 4 s^{2} 3 d^{10} 4 p^{2} .\) c. An excited state of this element has the electron configuration \(1 s^{2} 2 s^{2} 2 p^{4} 3 s^{1}\).

Write the expected ground-state electron configuration for the following: a. the element with one unpaired \(5 p\) electron that forms a covalent with compound fluorine b. the (as yet undiscovered) alkaline earth metal after radium

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Chemistry Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free