Chapter 8: Problem 99
Use the formal charge arguments to rationalize why \(\mathrm{BF}_{3}\) would not follow the octet rule.
Chapter 8: Problem 99
Use the formal charge arguments to rationalize why \(\mathrm{BF}_{3}\) would not follow the octet rule.
All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.
Get started for freeIn general, the higher the charge on the ions in an ionic compound, the more favorable the lattice energy. Why do some stable ionic compounds have \(+1\) charged ions even though \(+4,+5\), and \(+6\) charged ions would have a more favorable lattice energy?
Rationalize the following lattice energy values: $$ \begin{array}{|lc|} \hline \text { Compound } & \text { Lattice Energy (kJ/mol) } \\ \hline \text { CaSe } & -2862 \\ \mathrm{Na}_{2} \mathrm{Se} & -2130 \\ \mathrm{CaTe} & -2721 \\ \mathrm{Na}_{2} \mathrm{Te} & -2095 \\ \hline \end{array} $$
Predict the molecular structure, bond angles, and polarity (has a net dipole moment or has no net dipole moment) for each of the following compounds. a. \(\mathrm{SeCl}_{4}\) b. \(\mathrm{SO}_{2}\) c. \(\mathrm{KrF}_{4}\) d. \(\mathrm{CBr}_{4}\) e. \(\mathrm{IF}_{3}\) f. \(\mathrm{ClF}_{5}\)
Which of the following statements is(are) true? Correct the false statements. a. It is impossible to satisfy the octet rule for all atoms in \(\mathrm{XeF}_{2}\) b. Because \(\mathrm{SF}_{4}\) exists, \(\mathrm{OF}_{4}\) should also exist because oxygen is in the same family as sulfur. c. The bond in \(\mathrm{NO}^{+}\) should be stronger than the bond in \(\mathrm{NO}^{-}\) d. As predicted from the two Lewis structures for ozone, one oxygen-oxygen bond is stronger than the other oxygenoxygen bond.
When comparing the size of different ions, the general radii trend discussed in Chapter 7 is usually not very useful. What do you concentrate on when comparing sizes of ions to each other or when comparing the size of an ion to its neutral atom?
What do you think about this solution?
We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.