What are degenerate orbitals? According to Hund's rule, how are degenerate orbitals occupied?

Short Answer

Expert verified
Degenerate orbitals have the same energy levels, and according to Hund's rule, they are occupied by electrons singly with parallel spins before pairing occurs.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding Degenerate Orbitals

Degenerate orbitals are orbitals that have the same energy levels. In an atom, electrons can occupy different orbitals that belong to the same subshell (such as 2p or 3d orbitals), and if those orbitals have the same energy, they are referred to as degenerate.
02

Application of Hund's Rule

Hund's rule states that when electrons occupy degenerate orbitals, they must first fill each orbital singly with parallel spins before pairing up. This means that if there are multiple degenerate orbitals available, one electron will go into each orbital with its spin unpaired until all orbitals contain one electron. Only after that can additional electrons pair up with the first ones, filling the orbitals completely.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Understanding Degenerate Orbitals
Orbitals are like the 'rooms' where electrons 'live' inside an atom, and when we talk about degenerate orbitals, we're referring to 'rooms' that have the exact same energy levels. This is similar to having several identically sized rooms on the same floor of a building; they're at the same level, so no room is 'higher' or 'lower' than the other. In atomic terms, when electrons are looking for a 'room' or orbital to occupy, they don't have a preference for any particular one among the degenerate orbitals because the energy is the same; it's like they don't have to climb stairs to choose between them.
Electron Configuration and Hund's Rule
Electron configuration is all about the arrangement of electrons in an atom. Now, imagine a rule in the dorms that says every student must get their own room before anyone has to share. This is what Hund's rule is like for electrons. When you have degenerate orbitals, Hund's rule comes into play: each electron will first fill its own orbital, like students taking separate rooms, and only after each orbital has one electron (with their 'spin'—a kind of intrinsic momentum—all pointing the same way), will electrons start to pair up in the same orbital. This ensures that the electrons are as spread out as possible which is kind of like ensuring each student has their own personal space before they have to start sharing.
Orbital Energy Levels
In an atom, energy levels can be thought of as the different floors in a high-rise building, with the ground floor being the least energy-demanding level. The various orbitals within these levels are like different apartments, and some are higher-end than others. In terms of energy, electrons will generally fill the 'lower floors' (lower energy orbitals) first before moving 'upstairs' (to higher energy orbitals). It's sort of like people generally preferring to live on lower floors so they don't have to climb the stairs unless necessary. Understanding this building-like structure of electron accommodation in an atom helps clarify why the arrangement of electrons is crucial in determining an element's chemical behavior.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Use the trends in ionization energy and electron affinity to explain why calcium fluoride has the formula \(\mathrm{CaF}_{2}\) and not \(\mathrm{Ca}_{2} \mathrm{~F}\) or CaF.

According to Coulomb's law, rank the interactions between charged particles from lowest potential energy to highest potential energy. a. a \(1+\) charge and a \(1-\) charge separated by \(100 \mathrm{pm}\) b. a \(2+\) charge and a \(1-\) charge separated by \(100 \mathrm{pm}\) c. a \(1+\) charge and a \(1+\) charge separated by \(100 \mathrm{pm}\) d. a \(1+\) charge and a \(1-\) charge separated by \(200 \mathrm{pm}\)

Determine whether each statement regarding penetration and shielding is true or false. (Assume that all lower energy orbitals are fully occupied.) a. An electron in a \(3 s\) orbital is more shielded than an electron in a \(2 s\) orbital. b. An electron in a \(3 s\) orbital penetrates into the region occupied by core electrons more than electrons in a \(3 p\) orbital penetrates into the region occupied by core electrons. c. An electron in an orbital that penetrates closer to the nucleus always experiences more shielding than an electron in an orbital that does not penetrate as far. d. An electron in an orbital that penetrates close to the nucleus tends to experience a higher effective nuclear charge than an electron in an orbital that does not penetrate close to the nucleus.

Have each member of your group sketch a periodic table indicating a periodic trend (atomic size, first ionization energy, metallic character, etc.). Have each member present his or her table to the rest of the group and explain the trend based on concepts such as orbital size or effective nuclear charge.

The elements with atomic numbers 35 and 53 have similar chemical properties. Based on their electronic configurations, predict the atomic number of a heavier element that also should share these chemical properties.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Chemistry Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free