Log out Go to App
Go to App

Learning Materials

Features

Discover

Chapter 18: Problem 10

A recent study concluded that any amount of radiation exposure can cause biological damage. Explain the differences between the two models of radiation damage, the linear model and the threshold model.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The linear model (LNT) suggests a linear relationship between radiation exposure and biological damage, meaning any radiation exposure, even small doses, can cause proportional damage. The threshold model, however, proposes a threshold level below which no significant biological damage occurs, as the body can repair damage from low levels of radiation. Key differences include: 1) LNT assumes any radiation exposure causes damage, while threshold assumes negligible risk at low doses; 2) LNT suggests proportionality between exposure and damage, while the threshold model does not; and 3) LNT does not account for the body's repair ability, while the threshold model does.

Step by step solution

01

Linear Model of Radiation Damage

The linear model, also known as the linear no-threshold model (LNT), suggests that there is a linear relationship between the amount of radiation exposure and the biological damage it causes. This means that any increase in radiation exposure will result in a proportional increase in biological damage, and it suggests that any amount of radiation, even very small doses, can lead to some biological damage.
02

Threshold Model of Radiation Damage

The threshold model proposes that there is a certain level of radiation exposure, called the threshold, below which there is no significant biological damage. According to this model, the body can repair damage caused by low levels of radiation, and only when the radiation exposure surpasses the threshold level will significant damage occur. This model assumes that the risks of radiation exposure are negligible at low doses and only become significant when the exposure reaches or exceeds the threshold.
03

Key Differences between the Linear and Threshold Models

1. The linear model assumes that any amount of radiation exposure, even very small doses, can cause biological damage, whereas the threshold model assumes that the risks of radiation exposure are negligible at low doses and only become significant when the exposure reaches or exceeds the threshold. 2. The linear model suggests a proportional relationship between radiation exposure and biological damage, while the threshold model does not have such a linear relationship, as it only considers damage significant above a certain threshold. 3. The linear model does not take into account the body's ability to repair the biological damage caused by low levels of radiation, whereas the threshold model attributes a threshold level to the body's ability to repair the damage before significant harm occurs. In conclusion, the linear model and the threshold model of radiation damage represent two different ways of understanding the relationship between radiation exposure and biological damage. The linear model suggests that any amount of radiation exposure can lead to proportional damage, while the threshold model implies that there is a certain level of exposure below which the risks are negligible.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Start your free trial

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Calculate the amount of energy released per gram of hydrogen nuclei reacted for the following reaction. The atomic masses are \(^{1}_{1}{H}, 1.00782 \mathrm{u} ; \frac{2}{1} \mathrm{H}, 2.01410 \mathrm{u} ;\) and an electron, \(5.4858 \times\) \(10^{-4}\) u. (Hint: Think carefully about how to account for the electron mass.)$$\mathrm{i} \mathrm{H}+\mathrm{i} \mathrm{H} \longrightarrow_{\mathrm{i}}^{2} \mathrm{H}+_{+\mathrm{i}}^{0}$$

The curie (Ci) is a commonly used unit for measuring nuclear radioactivity: 1 curie of radiation is equal to \(3.7 \times 10^{10}\) decay events per second (the number of decay events from 1 g radium in 1 s). A 1.7 -mL sample of water containing tritium was injected into a 150 -lb person. The total activity of radiation injected was \(86.5 \mathrm{mCi}\). After some time to allow the tritium activity to equally distribute throughout the body, a sample of blood plasma containing \(2.0 \mathrm{mL}\) water at an activity of \(3.6 \mu \mathrm{Ci}\) was removed. From these data, calculate the mass percent of water in this 150 -lb person.

A \(0.10-\mathrm{cm}^{3}\) sample of a solution containing a radioactive nuclide \(\left(5.0 \times 10^{3}\) counts per minute per milliliter) is injected \right. into a rat. Several minutes later \(1.0 \mathrm{cm}^{3}\) blood is removed. The blood shows 48 counts per minute of radioactivity. Calculate the volume of blood in the rat. What assumptions must be made in performing this calculation?

Many elements have been synthesized by bombarding relatively heavy atoms with high-energy particles in particle accelerators. Complete the following nuclear equations, which have been used to synthesize elements. a. \(\quad+\frac{4}{2} H e \rightarrow 243 B k+\frac{1}{0} n\) b. \(^{238} \mathrm{U}+^{12}_{6} \mathrm{C} \rightarrow$$\quad$$+6_{0}^{1} n\) c. \(^{249} \mathrm{Cf}+$$\quad$$\rightarrow \frac{260}{105} D b+4 \frac{1}{6} n\) d. \(^{249} \mathrm{Cf}+^{10}_{5} \mathrm{B} \rightarrow \frac{257}{153} \mathrm{Lr}+\)__________

At a flea market, you've found a very interesting painting done in the style of Rembrandt's "dark period" (1642-1672). You suspect that you really do not have a genuine Rembrandt, but you take it to the local university for testing. Living wood shows a carbon- 14 activity of 15.3 counts per minute per gram. Your painting showed a carbon- 14 activity of 15.1 counts per minute per gram. Could it be a genuine Rembrandt?
See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Chemistry Textbooks

Chemical Reactions

Read Explanation

Making Measurements

Read Explanation

Physical Chemistry

Read Explanation

The Earths Atmosphere

Read Explanation

Inorganic Chemistry

Read Explanation

Chemical Analysis

Read Explanation
View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free