Much of the research on controlled fusion focuses on the problem of how to contain the reacting material. Magnetic fields appear to be the most promising mode of containment. Why is containment such a problem? Why must one resort to magnetic fields for containment?

Short Answer

Expert verified
Containment is a major problem in controlled fusion research due to the extremely high temperatures and reactive nature of plasma, which makes it difficult to control and maintain its shape. Magnetic fields are considered the most promising mode of containment because they can confine and control charged particles, such as the ions and electrons in plasma, without direct contact with the walls of the containment structure. This prevents damage to the walls while allowing the fusion reaction to proceed. Magnetic confinement concepts, such as tokamak and stellarator, use specially designed magnetic fields to achieve a controlled, stable plasma confinement.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding Controlled Fusion

Controlled fusion refers to the process of combining light atomic nuclei to form heavier nuclei, which releases a large amount of energy in the form of heat and light. This process is the same one that powers the sun, and is considered a potentially clean and abundant source of energy on Earth if it can be harnessed. Containment is crucial in this process because the plasma formed during the fusion reaction is extremely high in temperature (in the range of millions of degrees), and it must be kept away from the walls of the containment structure to avoid melting and to prevent energy losses.
02

Challenges in Containment

The containment of the plasma in the fusion reactor is difficult due to its extreme conditions. At such high temperatures, the plasma consists of charged particles (ions and electrons) which are highly reactive and prone to escaping the containment structure. Moreover, plasma is highly unstable and tends to have irregular turbulence patterns, making it difficult to control and maintain its shape. This necessitates the need for a specially designed containment method to prevent the plasma from touching the walls of the containment structure and to maintain a stable shape for a sufficient amount of time to achieve energy-producing nuclear fusion.
03

Why Magnetic Fields for Containment

Magnetic fields are considered to be the most promising mode of containment for fusion reactors because they can effectively confine and control charged particles, such as the ions and electrons in plasma. Magnetic fields exert a force on charged particles, causing them to follow the magnetic field lines. By properly designing the magnetic field configuration, the charged particles can be trapped in a closed and controlled path without the need for direct contact with the walls of the containment structure. This prevents the plasma from damaging the walls and allows the reaction to proceed. Some commonly studied magnetic confinement concepts are the tokamak and the stellarator. Both use specially designed magnetic fields to achieve a controlled, stable plasma confinement. In summary, magnetic fields are the most promising mode of containment in controlled fusion research because they can effectively harness and control the plasma in a non-contact fashion, keeping the plasma stable and preventing it from damaging the containment structure.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The easiest fusion reaction to initiate is $$\frac{2}{1} \mathrm{H}+\frac{3}{1} \mathrm{H} \longrightarrow_{2}^{4} \mathrm{He}+\frac{1}{0} \mathrm{n}$$ Calculate the energy released per \(\frac{4}{2} \mathrm{He}\) nucleus produced and per mole of \(^{4}_{2}\) He produced. The atomic masses are \(\frac{2}{1} \mathrm{H}\) \(2.01410 \mathrm{u} ; \frac{3}{1} \mathrm{H}, 3.01605 \mathrm{u} ;\) and \(\frac{4}{2} \mathrm{He}, 4.00260 \mathrm{u} .\) The masses of the electron and neutron are \(5.4858 \times 10^{-4} \mathrm{u}\) and \(1.00866 \mathrm{u}\) respectively.

Zirconium is one of the few metals that retains its structural integrity upon exposure to radiation. The fuel rods in most nuclear reactors therefore are often made of zirconium. Answer the following questions about the redox properties of zirconium based on the half-reaction $$\mathrm{ZrO}_{2} \cdot \mathrm{H}_{2} \mathrm{O}+\mathrm{H}_{2} \mathrm{O}+4 \mathrm{e}^{-} \longrightarrow \mathrm{Zr}+4 \mathrm{OH}^{-} \quad \mathscr{C}^{\circ}=-2.36 \mathrm{V}$$a. Is zirconium metal capable of reducing water to form hydrogen gas at standard conditions? b. Write a balanced equation for the reduction of water by zirconium. c. Calculate \(\mathscr{E}^{\circ}, \Delta G^{\circ},\) and \(K\) for the reduction of water by zirconium metal. d. The reduction of water by zirconium occurred during the accidents at Three Mile Island in \(1979 .\) The hydrogen produced was successfully vented and no chemical explosion occurred. If \(1.00 \times 10^{3} \mathrm{kg}\) Zr reacts, what mass of \(\mathrm{H}_{2}\) is produced? What volume of \(\mathrm{H}_{2}\) at 1.0 atm and \(1000 .^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\) is produced? e. At Chernobyl in \(1986,\) hydrogen was produced by the reaction of superheated steam with the graphite reactor core:$$\mathbf{C}(s)+\mathbf{H}_{2} \mathbf{O}(g) \longrightarrow \mathbf{C O}(g)+\mathbf{H}_{2}(g)$$ It was not possible to prevent a chemical explosion at Chernobyl. In light of this, do you think it was a correct decision to vent the hydrogen and other radioactive gases into the atmosphere at Three Mile Island? Explain.

A chemist wishing to do an experiment requiring \(^{47} \mathrm{Ca}^{2+}\) (half-life \(=4.5\) days) needs \(5.0 \mu \mathrm{g}\) of the nuclide. What mass of \(^{47} \mathrm{CaCO}_{3}\) must be ordered if it takes \(48 \mathrm{h}\) for delivery from the supplier? Assume that the atomic mass of \(^{47} \mathrm{Ca}\) is \(47.0 \mathrm{u}\)

Consider the following reaction to produce methyl acetate: When this reaction is carried out with \(\mathrm{CH}_{3} \mathrm{OH}\) containing oxygen-18, the water produced does not contain oxygen-18. Explain.

To determine the \(K_{\mathrm{sp}}\) value of \(\mathrm{Hg}_{2} \mathrm{I}_{2},\) a chemist obtained a solid sample of \(\mathrm{Hg}_{2} \mathrm{I}_{2}\) in which some of the iodine is present as radioactive \(^{131}\) I. The count rate of the \(\mathrm{Hg}_{2} \mathrm{I}_{2}\) sample is \(5.0 \times 10^{11}\) counts per minute per mole of I. An excess amount of \(\mathrm{Hg}_{2} \mathrm{I}_{2}(s)\) is placed into some water, and the solid is allowed to come to equilibrium with its respective ions. A 150.0 -mL sample of the saturated solution is withdrawn and the radioactivity measured at 33 counts per minute. From this information, calculate the \(K_{\mathrm{sp}}\) value for \(\mathrm{Hg}_{2} \mathrm{I}_{2}\) $$\mathrm{Hg}_{22}(s) \rightleftharpoons \mathrm{Hg}_{2}^{2+}(a q)+2 \mathrm{I}^{-}(a q) \quad K_{\mathrm{sp}}=\left[\mathrm{Hg}_{2}^{2+}\right]\left[\mathrm{I}^{-}\right]^{2}$$

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Chemistry Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free