Carbon monoxide (CO) forms bonds to a variety of metals and metal ions. Its ability to bond to iron in hemoglobin is the reason that \(\mathrm{CO}\) is so toxic. The bond carbon monoxide forms to metals is through the carbon atom: $$\mathbf{M}-\mathbf{C} \equiv \mathbf{O}$$ a. On the basis of electronegativities, would you expect the carbon atom or the oxygen atom to form bonds to metals? b. Assign formal charges to the atoms in CO. Which atom would you expect to bond to a metal on this basis? c. In the MO model, bonding MOs place more electron density near the more electronegative atom. (See the HF molecule in Figs. \(4-54\) and \(4-55 .\) ) Antibonding MOs place more electron density near the less electronegative atom in the diatomic molecule. Use the MO model to predict which atom of carbon monoxide should form bonds to metals.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Based on electronegativity, the less electronegative carbon atom is expected to form bonds with metals. Using formal charges, the positively charged carbon atom is more likely to bond to a metal. In the MO model, the carbon atom of carbon monoxide has a higher electron density in the antibonding orbitals, making it more likely to bond with metals. Overall, the carbon atom is more likely to form bonds with metals in CO.

Step by step solution

01

Compare Electronegativities of Carbon and Oxygen

To determine which atom is more likely to form bonds with metals based on electronegativity, we must look at the electronegativities of carbon and oxygen. Oxygen has an electronegativity of 3.44, while carbon has an electronegativity of 2.55. The higher the electronegativity, the greater the attraction an atom has for electrons. Oxygen is more electronegative than carbon, meaning it attracts electrons more strongly. Thus, we might expect the less electronegative carbon atom to form bonds with metals, as metal atoms generally have lower electronegativity and tend to lose electrons. #b. Formal Charges Calculation#
02

Calculate Formal Charges

Formal charges of atoms in a molecule can help predict which atom is more likely to form bonds. The individual formal charges can be calculated based on the number of valence electrons, the number of electrons in lone pairs, and the number of electrons in bonds assigned to a specific atom. For carbon monoxide (CO), we have: Carbon formal charge: \( \text{Formal charge} = \text{valence electrons} - (\text{non-bonding electrons} + \frac{\text{bonding electrons}}{2}) \) Carbon has 4 valence electrons. There are no non-bonding electrons, and there are 6 bonding electrons (triple bond). So, the formal charge of carbon is: \( \text{Formal charge}_{C} = 4 - \left(0+ \frac{6}{2}\right) = 4 - 3 = +1 \) For oxygen: Oxygen has 6 valence electrons, and in the case of CO, it has 2 non-bonding pairs (4 non-bonding electrons). The number of bonding electrons is the same as for carbon (6 electrons): \( \text{Formal charge}_{O} = 6 - \left(4 + \frac{6}{2}\right) = 6 - 7 = -1 \) Taking formal charges into account, we would expect the positively charged carbon atom to bond to a metal, which often carries a positive charge. #c. MO Model Prediction#
03

Use the MO Model to Predict Bond Formation

In the molecular orbital (MO) model, bonding orbitals place more electron density around the more electronegative atom (oxygen) in diatomic molecules, while the antibonding orbitals place more electron density around the less electronegative atom (carbon). Since metals form bonds when their atoms' electron density overlaps with that of another species, which in this case, is CO, it is likely that the less electronegative carbon atom with more electron density in antibonding orbitals will readily interact and bond with metal atoms. Thus, using the MO model, we predict that the carbon atom of carbon monoxide should form bonds to metals.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Describe the bonding in \(\mathrm{NO}^{+}, \mathrm{NO}^{-},\) and \(\mathrm{NO},\) using both the localized electron and molecular orbital models. Account for any discrepancies between the two models.

Two different compounds have the formula \(\mathrm{XeF}_{2} \mathrm{Cl}_{2}\). Write Lewis structures for these two compounds, and describe how measurement of dipole moments might be used to distinguish between them.

Why does the molecular orbital model do a better job in explaining the bonding in \(\mathrm{NO}^{-}\) and \(\mathrm{NO}\) than the hybrid orbital model?

For each of the following molecules or ions that contain sulfur, write the Lewis structure(s), predict the molecular structure (including bond angles), and give the expected hybrid orbitals for sulfur. a. \(\mathrm{SO}_{2}\) b. \(\mathrm{SO}_{3}\) c. \(\mathrm{S}_{2} \mathrm{O}_{3}^{2-}\left[\begin{array}{c}\mathrm{Q} \\\ \mathrm{S}-\mathrm{S}-\mathrm{O} \\ \mathrm{O}\end{array}\right]^{2-}\) d. \( \mathrm{S}_{2} \mathrm{O}_{8}^{2-}\left[\begin{array}{cc}\mathrm{Q} & \mathrm{Q} \\\ \mathrm{O}-\mathrm{S}-\mathrm{O}-\mathrm{O}-\mathrm{S}-\mathrm{O} \\\ \mathrm{O} & \mathrm{O}\end{array}\right]^{2-}\) e. \(\mathrm{SO}_{3}^{2-}\) f. \(\mathrm{SO}_{4}^{2-}\) g. \(\mathrm{SF}_{2}\) h. \(\mathrm{SF}_{4}\) i. \(\mathrm{SF}_{6}\) j. \(\mathbf{F}_{3} \mathbf{S}-\mathbf{S F}\) k. \(\mathrm{SF}_{5}^{+}\)

A flask containing gaseous \(\mathrm{N}_{2}\) is irradiated with 25 -nm light. a. Using the following information, indicate what species can form in the flask during irradiation. $$\begin{array}{ll} \mathrm{N}_{2}(g) \longrightarrow 2 \mathrm{N}(g) & \Delta E=941 \mathrm{kJ} / \mathrm{mol} \\ \mathrm{N}_{2}(g) \longrightarrow \mathrm{N}_{2}^{+}(g)+\mathrm{e}^{-} & \Delta E=1501 \mathrm{kJ} / \mathrm{mol} \\ \mathrm{N}(g) \longrightarrow \mathrm{N}^{+}(g)+\mathrm{e}^{-} & \Delta E=1402 \mathrm{kJ} / \mathrm{mol} \end{array}$$ b. What range of wavelengths will produce atomic nitrogen in the flask but will not produce any ions? c. Explain why the first ionization energy of \(\mathrm{N}_{2}(1501 \mathrm{kJ} /\) mol) is greater than the first ionization energy of atomic nitrogen (1402 kJ/mol).

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Chemistry Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free