Log out Go to App
Go to App

Learning Materials

Features

Discover

Chapter 9: Problem 10

Which are stronger, intermolecular or intramolecular forces for a given molecule? What observation(s) have you made that support this? Explain.

Short Answer

Expert verified
In general, intramolecular forces are stronger than intermolecular forces for a given molecule. Observations supporting this include the higher melting and boiling points of ionic compounds compared to covalent compounds and the solubility of ionic compounds in water compared to covalent compounds. These differences in properties can be attributed to the stronger forces within a molecule compared to the weaker forces between molecules.

Step by step solution

01

Introduction to Intermolecular and Intramolecular Forces

Intermolecular forces are the forces that hold molecules together in a substance. These forces include hydrogen bonding, dipole-dipole interactions, and London dispersion forces. Intramolecular forces, on the other hand, are the forces within a molecule that hold the atoms together. These forces include covalent, ionic, and metallic bonds.
02

Comparison of Intermolecular and Intramolecular Forces

In general, intramolecular forces are stronger than intermolecular forces. This is because the forces that hold atoms together within a molecule, such as covalent and ionic bonds, involve the sharing or transfer of electrons between the atoms. This results in stronger attractive forces between the atoms compared to the weaker forces that exist between separate molecules.
03

Observation 1: Melting and Boiling Points

One observation that supports the idea that intramolecular forces are stronger than intermolecular forces is the difference in melting and boiling points between ionic and covalent compounds. Ionic compounds, which have strong intramolecular forces, generally have higher melting and boiling points compared to covalent compounds, which are held together by weaker intermolecular forces. This is because the stronger intramolecular forces require more energy to be broken, resulting in higher melting and boiling points.
04

Observation 2: Solubility in Water

Another observation that supports the idea of stronger intramolecular forces is the solubility of ionic and covalent compounds in water. Ionic compounds, with their strong intramolecular forces, are often soluble in water, as the charged ions can form strong interactions with the polar water molecules, breaking apart the ionic compound. In contrast, covalent compounds with weaker intermolecular forces are often insoluble in water, as their nonpolar nature prevents them from interacting with the polar water molecules.
05

Conclusion

In summary, intramolecular forces are generally stronger than intermolecular forces for a given molecule. This is supported by observations such as the higher melting and boiling points of ionic compounds compared to covalent compounds and the solubility of ionic compounds in water compared to covalent compounds. These differences in properties can be attributed to the stronger forces within a molecule compared to the weaker forces between molecules.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Start your free trial

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Why do liquids have a vapor pressure? Do all liquids have vapor pressures? Explain. Do solids exhibit vapor pressure? Explain. How does vapor pressure change with changing temperature? Explain.

When wet laundry is hung on a clothesline on a cold winter day, it will freeze but eventually dry. Explain.

Why does water evaporate?

The CsCl structure is a simple cubic array of chloride ions with a cesium ion at the center of each cubic array (see Exercise 69 ). Given that the density of cesium chloride is \(3.97 \mathrm{g} / \mathrm{cm}^{3},\) and assuming that the chloride and cesium ions touch along the body diagonal of the cubic unit cell, calculate the distance between the centers of adjacent \(\mathrm{Cs}^{+}\) and \(\mathrm{Cl}^{-}\) ions in the solid. Compare this value with the expected distance based on the sizes of the ions. The ionic radius of \(\mathrm{Cs}^{+}\) is \(169 \mathrm{pm},\) and the ionic radius of \(\mathrm{Cl}^{-}\) is \(181 \mathrm{pm}\).

Iodine, like most substances, exhibits only three phases: solid, liquid, and vapor. The triple point of iodine is at 90 torr and \(115^{\circ} \mathrm{C} .\) Which of the following statements concerning liquid \(\mathrm{I}_{2}\) must be true? Explain your answer. a. \(\mathrm{I}_{2}(l)\) is more dense than \(\mathrm{I}_{2}(g).\) b. \(\mathrm{I}_{2}(l)\) cannot exist above \(115^{\circ} \mathrm{C}.\) c. \(\mathrm{I}_{2}(l)\) cannot exist at 1 atmosphere pressure. d. \(\mathrm{I}_{2}(l)\) cannot have a vapor pressure greater than 90 torr. e. \(\mathrm{I}_{2}(l)\) cannot exist at a pressure of 10 torr.
See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Chemistry Textbooks

Nuclear Chemistry

Read Explanation

Physical Chemistry

Read Explanation

Chemical Reactions

Read Explanation

Making Measurements

Read Explanation

Inorganic Chemistry

Read Explanation

Chemical Analysis

Read Explanation
View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free