For the cell $$ \mathrm{Zn}\left|\mathrm{Zn}^{2+}\right| \mathrm{Cu}^{2+} \mid \mathrm{Cu} $$ \(E^{\circ}\) is \(1.10 \mathrm{~V}\). A student prepared the same cell in the lab at standard conditions. Her experimental \(E^{\circ}\) was \(1.0 \mathrm{~V}\). A possible explanation for the difference is that (a) a larger volume of \(\mathrm{Zn}^{2+}\) than \(\mathrm{Cu}^{2+}\) was used. (b) the zinc electrode had twice the mass of the copper electrode. (c) \(\left[\mathrm{Zn}^{2+}\right]\) was smaller than \(1 M\). (d) \(\left[\mathrm{Cu}^{2+}\right]\) was smaller than \(1 M\). (e) the copper electrode had twice the surface area of the zinc electrode.

Short Answer

Expert verified
a) A larger volume of \(\mathrm{Zn}^{2+}\) than \(\mathrm{Cu}^{2+}\): No b) The zinc electrode with twice the mass of the copper electrode: No c) The concentration of \(\mathrm{Zn}^{2+}\) smaller than 1 M: Yes d) The concentration of \(\mathrm{Cu}^{2+}\) smaller than 1 M: Yes e) The copper electrode had twice the surface area of the zinc electrode: No

Step by step solution

01

Evaluate option (a)

In this option, a larger volume of \(\mathrm{Zn}^{2+}\) than \(\mathrm{Cu}^{2+}\) was used. Volumes, however, do not affect the cell potential, as the potential difference depends on concentrations and not volumes. So, this option is not a possible explanation for the lower experimental \(E^{\circ}\).
02

Evaluate option (b)

In option (b), we have the zinc electrode with twice the mass of the copper electrode. The overall cell potential is not directly related to the mass of the electrodes. So, this option is also not a possible explanation for the lower experimental \(E^{\circ}\).
03

Evaluate option (c)

Option (c) suggests that the concentration of \(\mathrm{Zn}^{2+}\), \(\left[\mathrm{Zn}^{2+}\right]\), was smaller than 1 M. Since the Nernst equation states that the cell potential difference depends on the concentrations of ions involved in the reaction, a smaller concentration of \(\mathrm{Zn}^{2+}\) could cause the observed difference in \(E^{\circ}\). This option could be a possible explanation.
04

Evaluate option (d)

Option (d) says that the concentration of \(\mathrm{Cu}^{2+}\), \(\left[\mathrm{Cu}^{2+}\right]\), was smaller than 1 M. As discussed for option (c), the cell potential difference depends on the concentrations of ions involved in the reaction. Therefore, a smaller concentration of \(\mathrm{Cu}^{2+}\) could also lead to a difference in \(E^{\circ}\). This option is also a possible explanation.
05

Evaluate option (e)

In option (e), the copper electrode had twice the surface area of the zinc electrode. The surface area does not affect the overall potential difference directly, so this option is not a possible explanation for the lower experimental \(E^{\circ}\).
06

Conclusion

Options (c) and (d) are both possible explanations for the difference in the experimental \(E^{\circ}\). These options state that the concentration of \(\mathrm{Zn}^{2+}\) or \(\mathrm{Cu}^{2+}\) was smaller than 1 M, which could lead to a different cell potential difference observed in the lab experiment.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Given the following data: $$ \begin{array}{cc} \mathrm{PtCl}_{4}{ }^{2-}(a q)+2 e^{-} \longrightarrow \mathrm{Pt}(s)+4 \mathrm{Cl}^{-}(a q) & E^{o}=+0.73 \mathrm{~V} \\ \mathrm{Pt}^{2+}(a q)+4 \mathrm{Cl}^{-}(a q) \longrightarrow \mathrm{PtCl}_{4}^{2-}(a q) & K_{f}=1 \times 10^{16} \end{array} $$ find \(E^{\circ}\) for the half-cell $$ \mathrm{Pt}^{2+}(a q)+2 e^{-} \longrightarrow \operatorname{Pt}(s) $$

A solution containing a metal ion \(\left(\mathrm{M}^{3+}(a q)\right)\) is electrolyzed by a current of \(5.0 \mathrm{~A}\). After \(10.0\) minutes, \(1.19 \mathrm{~g}\) of the metal is plated out. (a) How many coulombs are supplied by the battery? (b) What is the metal? (Assume \(100 \%\) efficiency.)

Consider the cell $$ \mathrm{Pt}\left|\mathrm{H}_{2}\right| \mathrm{H}^{+} \| \mathrm{H}^{+}\left|\mathrm{H}_{2}\right| \mathrm{Pt} $$ In the anode half-cell, hydrogen gas at \(1.0 \mathrm{~atm}\) is bubbled over a platinum electrode dipping into a solution that has a \(\mathrm{pH}\) of \(7.0 .\) The other half-cell is identical to the first except that the solution around the platinum electrode has a pH of \(0.0\). What is the cell voltage?

The electrolysis of an aqueous solution of \(\mathrm{NaCl}\) has the overall equation $$ 2 \mathrm{H}_{2} \mathrm{O}+2 \mathrm{Cl}^{-}(a q) \longrightarrow \mathrm{H}_{2}(g)+\mathrm{Cl}_{2}(g)+2 \mathrm{OH}^{-}(a q) $$ During the electrolysis, \(0.228\) mol of electrons passes through the cell. (a) How many electrons does this represent? (b) How many coulombs does this represent? (c) Assuming \(100 \%\) yield, what masses of \(\mathrm{H}_{2}\) and \(\mathrm{Cl}_{2}\) are produced?

Which of the following species will be oxidized by \(1 \mathrm{MHCl}\) ? (a) \(\mathrm{Au}\) (b) \(\mathrm{Mg}\) (c) Cu (d) \(\mathrm{F}^{-}\)

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Chemistry Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free