Which of the following statements does not follow from the fact that the alkali metals have relatively weak metal-metal bonding? $$ \begin{array}{l}{\text { (a) The alkali metals are less dense than other metals. }} \\ {\text { (b) The alkali metals are soft enough to be cut with a knife. }} \\ {\text { (c) The alkali metals are more reactive than other metals. }} \\ {\text { (d) The alkali metals have higher melting points than }} \\ {\text { other metals. }} \\ {\text { (e) The alkali metals have lowization energies. }}\end{array} $$

Short Answer

Expert verified
The statement that does not follow from the fact that alkali metals have relatively weak metal-metal bonding is: \( \text{(d) The alkali metals have higher melting points than other metals.} \)

Step by step solution

01

Analyze given properties and statements

Since alkali metals have weak metal-metal bonding, it means that these bonds are easily broken. This will allow alkali metals to possess certain properties. Now, let's analyze each statement to see if they are directly related to weak metal-metal bonding: (a) The alkali metals are less dense than other metals: Alkali metals, particularly those in Group 1 of the periodic table, are known to be less dense than transition metals. This is partially due to having less packed atomic arrangements, which in turn, is affected by their weaker metal-metal bonding. (b) The alkali metals are soft enough to be cut with a knife: The weakness of metal-metal bonding translates to the metal's ability to be deformed and cut easily. Therefore, this statement is related to the weak bonding nature of alkali metals. (c) The alkali metals are more reactive than other metals: The reactivity of alkali metals increases as their metal-metal bonds weakens. This means they have a greater tendency to lose an electron and form a positive ion, also explaining their low ionization energies. (d) The alkali metals have higher melting points than other metals: Melting points depend on the strength of the interaction between atoms. As alkali metals have weak metal-metal bonding, they are expected to have lower melting points compared to other metals. (e) The alkali metals have low ionization energies: Ionization energies depend on how easily an atom can lose an electron. Since alkali metals have weak metal-metal bonding, their atoms can lose an electron more easily, resulting in a low ionization energy.
02

Determine the statement that does not follow the given fact

From the analysis above, the statement that does not follow from the fact that alkali metals have relatively weak metal-metal bonding is: \( \text{(d) The alkali metals have higher melting points than other metals.} \) This statement contradicts the expected properties of alkali metals, which are known to have lower melting points due to their weak metal-metal bonding.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Metal-Metal Bonding
Metal-metal bonding is the interaction between metal atoms in a metallic substance. The strength of this bonding can significantly influence the physical properties of the metal. For alkali metals, which include lithium, sodium, potassium, rubidium, cesium, and francium, the metal-metal bonds are relatively weaker compared to those in transition metals.

This weak bonding is because alkali metals have a single valence electron that is more loosely held due to its greater distance from the nucleus. As a result, these metals exhibit characteristics such as being less dense and softer; they can be effortlessly cut with a simple knife. Understanding this concept is essential when evaluating why certain properties, like melting points, differ among the metals.
Reactivity of Alkali Metals
Alkali metals are known for their high reactivity, particularly with water and halogens. This reactivity stems from their desire to lose a single valence electron to achieve a stable electron configuration. The ease of electron loss is facilitated by weaker metal-metal bonding, which permits this single valence electron to be readily available for interaction.

The reactivity of these metals increases down the group as the atom sizes grow larger, and the valence electron's orbit is further from the nucleus, making it even easier to remove. Therefore, francium is the most reactive of the alkali metals, although it's rare and highly radioactive. This characteristic reactivity is a major point of interest when studying alkali metals, as it impacts their practical applications and safety precautions during handling.
Ionization Energies
Ionization energy is the amount of energy required to remove the most loosely bound electron from an atom to form a cation. For alkali metals, the ionization energies are considerably low, making them highly reactive. The low ionization energy is directly linked to their weak metal-metal bonding.

As we move down the group in the periodic table, these ionization energies decrease, which means it takes less energy to remove the outer electron. This decrease is because of the increased atomic size, which creates a greater distance between the nucleus and the valence electron, reducing the attraction and thus making it easier for the electron to be ionized. Educating students about ionization energies reinforces the concept of reactivity and the periodic trends observed within the alkali metal group.
Melting Points of Metals
Melting points of metals provide insights into the strength of metal-metal bonding within their structure. Typically, a higher melting point indicates stronger bonding forces holding the metallic lattice together. For alkali metals, their melting points are lower compared to many other metals, indicative of the weaker metal-metal bonds present.

This property becomes particularly noteworthy when comparing across the periodic table: transition metals generally have much higher melting points due to their several shared bonding electrons creating a stronger metallic bond. By contrast, the single valence electron of alkali metals results in a less robust metallic lattice, hence their lower melting points. Understanding this property not only aids in predicting the state of matter under various conditions but also in exploring the suitability of metals for different applications based on their thermal stability.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

For each of these solids, state whether you would expect it to possess metallic properties: (a) TiCl_ \(_{4},(\mathbf{b})\) NiCo alloy, \((\mathbf{c}) \mathrm{W}\) \((\mathbf{d}) \mathrm{Ge},(\mathbf{e}) \mathrm{ScN}\)

Calculate the volume in \(\hat{A}^{3}\) of each of the following types of cubic unit cells if it is composed of atoms with an atomic radius of 1.82 A. (a) primitive (b) face-centered cubic.

Which of these statements about alloys and intermetallic compounds is false? (a) Bronze is an example of an alloy. (b) "Alloy" is just another word for "a chemical compound of fixed composition that is made of two or more metals." (c) Intermetallics are compounds of two or more metals that have a definite composition and are not considered alloys. (d) If you mix two metals together and, at the atomic level, they separate into two or more different compositional phases, you have created a heterogeneous alloy.(e) Alloys can be formed even if the atoms that comprise them are rather different in size.

For each of the following alloy compositions, indicate whether you would expect it to be a substitutional alloy, an interstitial alloy, or an intermetallic compound: $$ (a)\mathrm{Cu}_{0.66} \mathrm{Zn}_{0.34}, \quad(\mathbf{b}) \mathrm{Ag}_{3} \mathrm{Sn}, \quad(\mathbf{c}) \mathrm{Ti}_{0.99} \mathrm{O}_{0.01} $$

Sodium metal (atomic weight 22.99 \(\mathrm{g} / \mathrm{mol}\) ) adopts a body- centered cubic structure with a density of 0.97 \(\mathrm{g} / \mathrm{cm}^{3}\) . (a) Use this information and Avogadro's number \(\left(N_{\mathrm{A}}=6.022 \times 10^{23} / \mathrm{mol}\right)\) to estimate the atomic radius of sodium. \((\mathbf{b})\) If sodium didn't react so vigorously, it could float on water. Use the answer from part (a) to estimate the density of Na if its structure were that of a cubic close packed metal. Would it still float on water?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Chemistry Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free