One of the principles of green chemistry is that it is better to use as few steps as possible in making new chemicals. In what ways does following this rule advance the goals of green chemistry? How does this principle relate to energy efficiency?

Short Answer

Expert verified
Following the principle of using as few steps as possible in making new chemicals advances the goals of green chemistry by reducing waste, improving resource conservation, promoting energy efficiency, and enhancing safety. It reduces the overall energy consumed in the process, leading to greater energy efficiency, reduced costs, and lower greenhouse gas emissions. This principle is vital as it enables industries to minimize their environmental footprint, save costs, and contribute to a more sustainable future.

Step by step solution

01

Understand the Goals of Green Chemistry

Green chemistry, also known as sustainable chemistry, focuses on designing products and processes that minimize the use and generation of hazardous substances. The goals of green chemistry are to reduce environmental impact, improve energy efficiency, enhance resource conservation, and promote human health and safety.
02

Analyze the Principle of Fewer Steps

One of the principles of green chemistry suggests that it is better to use as few steps as possible in making new chemicals. This principle is based on the idea that reducing the number of steps in a chemical process can decrease the chances of creating waste, lower energy consumption, and minimize the environmental impact associated with the production of chemicals.
03

Explain the Advantages of Fewer Steps

Following the principle of fewer steps in making new chemicals advances the goals of green chemistry in multiple ways: 1. Reduction of waste: Fewer steps can result in less waste generation, which reduces the environmental impact of the chemical process. This aligns with the goal of green chemistry to minimize hazardous substances and waste. 2. Resource conservation: Using fewer steps means consuming fewer raw materials and reducing waste generation, thus promoting better resource conservation. 3. Cost-effectiveness: Shorter processes require less energy and resources, which can lead to cost savings for the industry and make environmentally friendly processes more attractive to companies. 4. Enhanced safety: Fewer process steps also lower the risk of accidents, as there are fewer opportunities for hazardous substances to come into contact with humans or leak into the environment.
04

Relate the Principle to Energy Efficiency

The principle of using as few steps as possible directly relates to energy efficiency. Each step in a chemical process typically requires energy input, either in the form of heat, electricity, or mechanical work. By reducing the number of steps, the overall energy consumed in the process decreases. This leads to greater energy efficiency, reduced costs, and lower greenhouse gas emissions – all of which are important goals of green chemistry. Additionally, energy-efficient processes tend to require less raw material input, further reducing waste and environmental impact.
05

Conclusion

In conclusion, following the principle of using as few steps as possible in making new chemicals advances the goals of green chemistry by reducing waste, improving resource conservation, promoting energy efficiency, and enhancing safety. This principle is vital as it enables industries to minimize their environmental footprint, save costs, and contribute to a more sustainable future.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The following data were collected for the destruction of \(\mathrm{O}_{3}\) by \(\mathrm{H}\left(\mathrm{O}_{3}+\mathrm{H} \longrightarrow \mathrm{O}_{2}+\mathrm{OH}\right)\) at very low concentrations: $$\begin{array}{lll}{\text { Trial }} & {\left[0_{3}\right](M)} & {[\mathrm{H}](M)} & {\text { Initial Rate }(M / s)} \\ \hline 1 & {5.17 \times 10^{-33}} & {3.22 \times 10^{-26}} & {1.88 \times 10^{-14}} \\ {2} & {2.59 \times 10^{-33}} & {3.25 \times 10^{-26}} & {9.44 \times 10^{-15}} \\\ {3} & {5.19 \times 10^{-33}} & {6.46 \times 10^{-26}} & {3.77 \times 10^{-14}}\end{array}$$ \begin{equation}\begin{array}{l}{\text { (a) Write the rate law for the reaction. }} \\ {\text { (b) Calculate the rate constant. }}\end{array}\end{equation}

If an average \(\mathrm{O}_{3}\) molecule "lives" only \(100-200\) seconds in the stratosphere before undergoing dissociation, how can \(\mathrm{O}_{3}\) offer any protection from ultraviolet radiation?

The water supply for a midwestern city contains the following impurities: coarse sand, finely divided particulates, nitrate ions, trihalomethanes, dissolved phosphorus in the form of phosphates, potentially harmful bacterial strains, dissolved organic substances. Which of the following processes or agents, if any, is effective in removing each of these impurities: coarse sand filtration, activated carbon filtration, aeration, ozonization, precipitation with aluminum hydroxide?

(a) What are \(trihalomethanes\) (THMs)? (b) Draw the Lewis structures of two example THMs.

One mystery in environmental science is the imbalance in the "carbon dioxide budget." Considering only human activities, scientists have estimated that 1.6 billion metric tons of \(\mathrm{CO}_{2}\) is added to the atmosphere every year because of deforestation (plants use \(\mathrm{CO}_{2},\) and fewer plants will leave more \(\mathrm{CO}_{2}\) in the atmosphere). Another 5.5 billion tons per year is put into the atmosphere because of burning fossil fuels. It is further estimated (again, considering only human activities) that the atmosphere actually takes up about 3.3 billion tons of this \(\mathrm{CO}_{2}\) per year, while the oceans take up 2 billion tons per year, leaving about 1.8 billion tons of \(\mathrm{CO}_{2}\) per year unaccounted for. Describe a mechanism by which \(\mathrm{CO}_{2}\) is removed from the atmosphere and ultimately ends up below the surface (Hint: What is the source of the fossil fuels?) [Sections \(18.1-18.3 ]\)

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Chemistry Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free