One of the more famous species in coordination chemistry is the Creutz-Taube complex: It is named for the two scientists who discovered it and initially studied its properties. The central ligand is pyrazine, a planar six-membered ring with nitrogens at opposite sides. (a) How can you account for the fact that the complex, which has only neutral ligands, has an odd overall charge? (b) The metal is in a low-spin configuration in both cases. Assuming octahedral coordination, draw the \(d\)-orbital energy-level diagram for each metal. (c) In many experiments the two metal ions appear to be in exactly equivalent states. Can you think of a reason that this might appear to be so, recognizing that electrons move very rapidly compared to nuclei?

Short Answer

Expert verified
The Creutz-Taube complex has an odd overall charge due to the oxidation states of the two metal ions combined with the neutral ligands. The \(d\)-orbital energy-level diagram for each metal ion can be drawn by determining the oxidation state and electron configuration, identifying ligand strength, and drawing the energy levels for octahedral coordination using a low-spin configuration. The two metal ions might appear to be in exactly equivalent states in experiments because of the rapid electron transfer facilitated by the bridging ligand, causing the metal ions to share electrons effectively and behave as if they are in identical chemical environments.

Step by step solution

01

a) Accounting for the odd overall charge

To account for the odd overall charge in the Creutz-Taube complex with only neutral ligands, it is essential to consider the oxidation states of the two metal ions present in the complex. The oxidation states of the metal ions combined with the charges contributed by ligands (neutral in this case) will result in the overall charge of the complex.
02

b) Drawing the \(d\)-orbital energy-level diagram for each metal

To draw the \(d\)-orbital energy-level diagram for each metal in the Creutz-Taube complex, we need to consider the following steps: 1. Determine the oxidation state of each metal. The oxidation states will give the electron configuration of each metal ion. 2. Identify the ligands' nature in the complex, i.e., whether they are strong field or weak field ligands. The strength of the ligand determines whether it will produce a high or low crystal field splitting. 3. Assuming octahedral coordination, draw the energy levels of the \(d\)-orbitals, splitting them into three lower-energy orbitals (dz^2 and dx^2-y^2) and two higher-energy orbitals (dxy, dyz, and dxz) due to the octahedral crystal field splitting. 4. Fill the electrons based on the electron configuration determined in step 1, following the low-spin configuration rule, i.e., pairing the electrons in the lower-energy orbitals before occupying the higher-energy orbitals.
03

c) Explaining equivalent states of metal ions

The reason why the two metal ions might appear to be in exactly equivalent states in many experiments is the rapid electron transfer between the metal ions. Since electrons move very rapidly compared to the nuclei, it could create a situation where the two metal ions appear to be in equivalent states. The rapid electron transfer can be facilitated by the ligand bridging the two metal ions, causing the metal ions to share the electrons effectively, making them behave as if they are in identical chemical environments.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

As shown in Figure 23.26, the \(d-d\) transition of \(\left[\mathrm{Ti}\left(\mathrm{H}_{2} \mathrm{O}\right)_{6}\right]^{3+}\) produces an absorption maximum at a wavelength of about 500 \(\mathrm{nm}\) . (a) What is the magnitude of \(\Delta\) for \(\left[\mathrm{Ti}\left(\mathrm{H}_{2} \mathrm{O}\right)_{6}\right]^{3+}\) in \(\mathrm{kJ} / \mathrm{mol} ?\) (b) How would the magnitude of \(\Delta\)change if the \(\mathrm{H}_{2} \mathrm{O}\) ligands in \(\left[\mathrm{Ti}\left(\mathrm{H}_{2} \mathrm{O}\right)_{6}\right]^{3+}\) were replaced with \(\mathrm{NH}_{3}\) ligands?

The total concentration of \(\mathrm{Ca}^{2+}\) and \(\mathrm{Mg}^{2+}\) in a sample of hard water was determined by titrating a 0.100-L sample of the water with a solution of EDTA \(^{4-} .\) The EDTA \(^{4-}\) chelatesthe two cations: $$\begin{array}{c}{\mathrm{Mg}^{2+}+[\mathrm{EDTA}]^{4-} \longrightarrow[\mathrm{Mg}(\mathrm{EDTA})]^{2-}} \\\ {\mathrm{Ca}^{2+}+[\mathrm{EDTA}]^{4-} \longrightarrow[\mathrm{Ca}(\mathrm{EDTA})]^{2-}}\end{array}$$ It requires 31.5 \(\mathrm{mL}\) of 0.0104 \(\mathrm{M}[\mathrm{EDTA}]^{4-}\) solution to reach the end point in the titration. A second 0.100-L sample was then treated with sulfate ion to precipitate \(\mathrm{Ca}^{2+}\) as calcium sulfate. The \(\mathrm{Mg}^{2+}\) was then titrated with 18.7 \(\mathrm{mL}\) of 0.0104 \(M[\mathrm{EDTA}]^{4-} .\) Calculate the concentrations of \(\mathrm{Mg}^{2+}\) and \(\mathrm{Ca}^{2+}\) in the hard water in \(\mathrm{mg} / \mathrm{L} .\)

Explain why the transition metals in periods 5 and 6 have nearly identical radii in each group.

(a) Sketch a diagram that shows the definition of the crystal-field splitting energy \((\Delta)\) for an octahedral crystal-field. (b) What is the relationship between the magnitude of \(\Delta\) and the energy of the \(d\)-\(d\) transition for a \(d^{1}\) complex? (c) Calculate \(\Delta\) in \(\mathrm{k} J / \mathrm{mol}\) if a \(d^{1}\) complex has an absorption maximum at 545 \(\mathrm{nm} .\)

The \(E^{\circ}\) values for two low-spin iron complexes in acidic solution are as follows: \(\left[\mathrm{Fe}(o-\mathrm{phen})_{3}\right]^{3+}(a q)+\mathrm{e}^{-} \Longrightarrow\) \(\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad\) \(\left[\mathrm{Fe}(o-\mathrm{phen})_{3}\right]^{2+}(a q) \quad E^{\circ}=1.12 \mathrm{V}\) \(\left[\mathrm{Fe}(\mathrm{CN})_{6}\right]^{3-}(a q)+\mathrm{e}^{-} \rightleftharpoons\) \(\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad\) \(\left[\mathrm{Fe}(\mathrm{CN})_{6}\right]^{4-}(a q) \quad E^{\circ}=0.36 \mathrm{V}\) (a) Is it thermodynamically favorable to reduce both Fe(III) complexes to their Fe(II) analogs? Explain. (b) Which complex, \(\left[\mathrm{Fe}(o-\mathrm{phen})_{3}\right]^{3+}\) or \(\left[\mathrm{Fe}(\mathrm{CN})_{6}\right]^{3-},\) is more difficult to reduce? (c) Suggest an explanation for your answer to (b).

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Chemistry Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free