Explain why "bands" may not be the most accurate description of bonding in a solid when the solid has nanoscale dimensions.

Short Answer

Expert verified
In a solid with nanoscale dimensions, the concept of "bands" may not be the most accurate description of bonding, as quantum confinement effects come into play, leading to discrete energy levels instead of continuous energy bands found in bulk materials. This discreteness in energy levels is a result of electron wave functions being confined to a smaller spatial region, limiting the overlap between molecular orbitals. Therefore, band theory does not accurately represent the electronic structure or bonding in nanoscale solids.

Step by step solution

01

Introducing Band Theory

Band theory is used to describe the energy states of electrons in a solid. In a solid, the valence electrons of the atoms are shared with neighboring atoms, forming numerous molecular orbitals that overlap with each other. When there are a large number of overlapping orbitals, they effectively merge to form continuous energy bands. The band structure ultimately depends on the distribution of the electron density and the atomic arrangement. There are two types of energy bands: valence bands filled with electrons and conduction bands that are empty or partially filled.
02

Understanding Nanoscale Dimensions

Nanoscale dimensions refer to solids where at least one of their dimensions is on the order of nanometers, typically between 1 and 100 nanometers in size. In such small scales, the properties of materials start to deviate from their bulk counterparts due to quantum confinement effects, which result in electron wave functions being confined in a limited space. This confinement leads to an entirely new set of physical behaviors and properties, which are not accurately described using the traditional band theory.
03

Effects of Quantum Confinement and Discreteness

In a nanoscale solid, quantum confinement results in electron wave functions being confined to a much smaller spatial region than in bulk materials. This confinement manifests itself through the discreteness of energy levels, meaning that the continuous energy bands seen in bulk materials are replaced by discrete energy states or levels. As the size of the solid reduces to the nanoscale, the overlap between molecular orbitals is limited, diminishing the formation of continuous energy bands. Instead, these discrete orbitals or quantum states are more representative of the bonding in nanoscale solids.
04

Conclusion

In conclusion, the term "bands" may not be the most accurate description for bonding in a solid with nanoscale dimensions. This is mainly due to the quantum confinement effects, which lead to discrete energy levels instead of continuous energy bands typically found in bulk materials. Hence, band theory does not accurately describe the electronic structure or bonding in nanoscale solids.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

What kinds of attractive forces exist between particles (atoms, molecules, or ions) in (a) molecular crystals, (b) covalent-network crystals, (c) ionic crystals, (d) and metallic crystals?

For each of the following alloy compositions, indicate whether you would expect it to be a substitutional alloy, an interstitial alloy, or an intermetallic compound: (a) \(\mathrm{Cu}_{0.66} \mathrm{Zn}_{0.34}\) (b) \(\mathrm{Ag}_{3} \mathrm{Sn}\) (c) \(\mathrm{Ti}_{0.99} \mathrm{O}_{0.01}\)

Which would you expect to be the more ductile element, (a) \(\mathrm{Ag}\) or \(\mathrm{Cr}\) (b) Zn or Ge? In each case explain your reasoning.

Proteins are naturally occurring polymers formed by condensation reactions of amino acids, which have the general structure In this structure, \(-\mathrm{R}\) represents \(-\mathrm{H},-\mathrm{CH}_{3},\) or another group of atoms; there are 20 different natural amino acids, and each has one of 20 different R groups. (a) Draw the general structure of a protein formed by condensation polymerization of the generic amino acid shown here. (b) When only a few amino acids react to make a chain, the product is called a "peptide" rather than a protein; only when there are 50 amino acids or more in the chain would the molecule be called a protein. For three amino acids (distinguished by having three different R groups, R1, R2, and R3), draw the peptide that results from their condensation reactions. (c) The order in which the R groups exist in a peptide or protein has a huge influence on its biological activity. To distinguish different peptides and proteins, chemists call the first amino acid the one at the \({ }^{\prime \prime} \mathrm{N}\) terminus" and the last one the one at the "C terminus." From your drawing in part (b) you should be able to figure out what "N terminus" and "C terminus" mean. How many different peptides can be made from your three different amino acids?

Determine if each statement is true or false: (a) Substitutional alloys are solid solutions, but interstitial alloys are heterogenous alloys. (b) Substitutional alloys have "solute" atoms that replace "solvent" atoms in a lattice, but interstitial alloys have "solute" atoms that are in between the "solvent" atoms in a lattice. (c) The atomic radii of the atoms in a substitutional alloy are similar to each other, but in an interstitial alloy, the interstitial atoms are a lot smaller than the host lattice atoms.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Chemistry Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free