A mixture of copper and gold metals that is subjected to electrorefining contains tellurium as an impurity. The standard reduction potential between tellurium and its lowest common oxidation state, \(\mathrm{Te}^{4+}\), is $$ \mathrm{Te}^{4+}(a q)+4 \mathrm{e}^{-} \longrightarrow \mathrm{Te}(s) \quad E_{\mathrm{red}}^{\circ}=0.57 \mathrm{~V} $$ Given this information, describe the probable fate of tellurium impurities during electrorefining. Do the impurities fall to the bottom of the refining bath, unchanged, as copper is oxidized, or do they go into solution as ions? If they go into solution, do they plate out on the cathode?

Short Answer

Expert verified
During electrorefining, tellurium impurities will likely go into solution as \(\mathrm{Te}^{4+}\) ions, given its standard reduction potential of 0.57 V is higher than that of copper but lower than gold. The tellurium impurities will then plate out on the cathode along with gold but before copper.

Step by step solution

01

1. Familiarize with Electrorefining Process

Electrorefining is a process in which an impure metal is purified through the use of an electrolytic cell. In this case, a copper-gold mixture with tellurium impurities is being refined. When a voltage is applied, the impure metal reacts at the anode, and the pure metal deposits at the cathode. Impurities can either settle to the bottom as slag or enter the solution, depending on their properties.
02

2. List provided information

We know the following information from the problem statement: - The standard reduction potential for tellurium, \(E_{\mathrm{red}}^\circ(\mathrm{Te}^{4+}/\mathrm{Te})\), is 0.57 V. - We are trying to determine the fate of tellurium impurities during electrorefining.
03

3. Compare standard reduction potentials

To determine the probable fate of tellurium impurities, we need to compare its standard reduction potential with that of copper. The standard reduction potentials for copper and gold are as follows: - Copper: \(E_{\mathrm{red}}^\circ(\mathrm{Cu}^{2+}/\mathrm{Cu}) = +0.337 \mathrm{~V}\) - Gold: \(E_{\mathrm{red}}^\circ(\mathrm{Au}^{3+}/\mathrm{Au}) = +1.498 \mathrm{~V}\) Since the standard reduction potential of tellurium is higher than that of copper but lower than gold, tellurium is more likely to be reduced than copper, but not as likely as gold.
04

4. Determine the fate of tellurium impurities

We now consider the three possible scenarios: 1. Impurities fall to the bottom, unchanged: This situation would occur if tellurium neither oxidizes nor reduces during the electrorefining process, which is unlikely given the provided reduction potential. 2. Impurities go into solution as ions: This happens if tellurium oxidizes more readily than copper. Comparing reduction potentials, we find that tellurium's potential is higher than copper's. Therefore, tellurium is more likely to be reduced than copper, implying that tellurium ions would enter the solution and not turn to slag. 3. Impurities plate out on the cathode: This situation can occur when a metal with a higher reduction potential than copper plates out on the cathode during the process. The reduction potential of tellurium is higher than copper but lower than gold, which means tellurium will have a tendency to plate out on the cathode along with gold but before copper. Based on the discussion above, the probable fate of tellurium impurities during electrorefining is to go into solution as \(\mathrm{Te}^{4+}\) ions and then plate out on the cathode.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

A voltaic cell is constructed with two \(\mathrm{Cu}^{2+}-\mathrm{Cu}\) electrodes. The two half-cells have $\left[\mathrm{Cu}^{2+}\right]=0.100 \mathrm{M}\( and \)\left[\mathrm{Cu}^{2+}\right]=1.00 \times 10^{-4} \mathrm{M}$, respectively. (a) Which electrode is the cathode of the cell? (b) What is the standard emf of the cell? (c) What is the cell emf for the concentrations given? (d) For each electrode, predict whether \(\left[\mathrm{Cu}^{2+}\right]\) will increase, decrease, or stay the same as the cell operates.

Consider a redox reaction for which \(E^{\circ}\) is a negative number. (a) What is the sign of \(\Delta G^{\circ}\) for the reaction? (b) Will the equilibrium constant for the reaction be larger or smaller than \(1 ?\) (c) Can an electrochemical cell based on this reaction accomplish work on its surroundings?

For each of the following balanced oxidation-reduction reactions, (i) identify the oxidation numbers for all the elements in the reactants and products and (ii) state the total number of electrons transferred in each reaction. (a) \(14 \mathrm{H}^{+}(a q)+2 \mathrm{Mn}^{2+}(a q)+5 \mathrm{NaBiO}_{3}(s)\) $\quad \longrightarrow 7 \mathrm{H}_{2} \mathrm{O}(l)+2 \mathrm{MnO}_{4}^{-}+5 \mathrm{Bi}^{3+}(a q)+5 \mathrm{Na}^{+}(a q)$ (b) $2 \mathrm{KMnO}_{4}(a q)+3 \mathrm{Na}_{2} \mathrm{SO}_{3}(a q)+\mathrm{H}_{2} \mathrm{O}(l)\( \)\quad \longrightarrow 2 \mathrm{MnO}_{2}(s)+3 \mathrm{Na}_{2} \mathrm{SO}_{4}(a q)+2 \mathrm{KOH}(a q)$ (c) $\mathrm{Cu}(s)+2 \mathrm{AgNO}_{3}(a q) \longrightarrow 2 \mathrm{Ag (s)+\mathrm{Cu}\left(\mathrm{NO}_{3}\right)_{2}(a q)$

During the discharge of an alkaline battery, \(4.50 \mathrm{~g}\) of \(\mathrm{Zn}\) is consumed at the anode of the battery. (a) What mass of \(\mathrm{MnO}_{2}\) is reduced at the cathode during this discharge? (b) How many coulombs of electrical charge are transferred from \(\mathrm{Zn}\) to \(\mathrm{MnO}_{2} ?\)

A voltaic cell similar to that shown in Figure 20.5 is constructed. One half- cell consists of an iron strip placed in a solution of \(\mathrm{FeSO}_{4}\), and the other has an aluminum strip placed in a solution of \(\mathrm{Al}_{2}\left(\mathrm{SO}_{4}\right)_{3} .\) The overall cell reaction is $$ 2 \mathrm{Al}(s)+3 \mathrm{Fe}^{2+}(a q) \longrightarrow 3 \mathrm{Fe}(s)+2 \mathrm{Al}^{3+}(a q) $$ (a) What is being oxidized, and what is being reduced? (b) Write the half- reactions that occur in the two half-cells. (c) Which electrode is the anode, and which is the cathode? (d) Indicate the signs of the electrodes. (e) Do electrons flow from the aluminum electrode to the iron electrode or from the iron to the aluminum? (f) In which directions do the cations and anions migrate through the solution? Assume the \(\mathrm{Al}\) is not coated with its oxide.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Chemistry Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free