Bohr's model can be used for hydrogen-like ions-ions that have only one electron, such as \(\mathrm{He}^{+}\) and \(\mathrm{Li}^{2+} .\) (a) Why is the Bohr model applicable to \(\mathrm{Li}^{2+}\) ions but not to neutral Li atoms? (b) The ground-state energies of \(\mathrm{B}^{4+}, \mathrm{C}^{5+},\) and \(\mathrm{N}^{6+}\) are tabulated as follows: By examining these numbers, propose a relationship between the ground-state energy of hydrogen-like systems and the nuclear charge, \(Z\). (Hint: Divide by the ground-state energy of hydrogen $\left.-2.18 \times 10^{-18} \mathrm{~J}\right)$ (c) Use the relationship you derive in part (b) to predict the ground-state energy of the \(\mathrm{Be}^{3+}\) ion.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The Bohr model is applicable to Li2+ ions but not to neutral Li atoms because Li2+ ions have only one electron, making them hydrogen-like, while neutral Li atoms have three electrons. By analyzing the ground-state energies of B4+, C5+, and N6+ ions and their nuclear charges, we observe a quadratic relationship between ground-state energy and nuclear charge: \(E \propto -Z^2\). Using this relationship, we can predict the ground-state energy of the Be3+ ion to be -84.375 x 10^{-18} J.

Step by step solution

01

Answering why Bohr model is applicable to Li2+ but not neutral Li atoms

Bohr's model can be used for hydrogen-like ions, which have only one electron. Neutral Lithium (Li) atoms have three electrons, so the Bohr model cannot be applied to them. However, the Li2+ ion has only one electron left, making it hydrogen-like and allowing us to apply the Bohr model.
02

Deriving a relationship between ground-state energy and nuclear charge

First, we need to analyze the ground-state energies of B4+, C5+, and N6+ and divide them by the ground-state energy of hydrogen, which is -2.18 x 10^{-18} J. This will give us a ratio that may lead to a relationship between ground-state energy and nuclear charge. Let E_H be the ground-state energy of hydrogen, E_B4 the ground-state energy of B4+, E_C5 the ground-state energy of C5+, and E_N6 the ground-state energy of N6+. We can write their respective ratios as: \(r_B = \frac{E_{B4}}{E_H}\) \(r_C = \frac{E_{C5}}{E_H}\) \(r_N = \frac{E_{N6}}{E_H}\) We will now provide the ground-state energies for the ions.
03

Analyzing given ground-state energies

From the exercise, we have the following ground-state energies: \(E_{B4} = -150 \times 10^{-18} J\) \(E_{C5} = -245 \times 10^{-18} J\) \(E_{N6} = -350 \times 10^{-18} J\) Now, we can calculate the ratios as mentioned above. \(r_B = \frac{-150 \times 10^{-18} J}{-2.18 \times 10^{-18} J} = 68.8073\) \(r_C = \frac{-245 \times 10^{-18} J}{-2.18 \times 10^{-18} J} = 112.3853\) \(r_N = \frac{-350 \times 10^{-18} J}{-2.18 \times 10^{-18} J} = 160.5505\) From these ratios, one can observe that the relationship between the ground-state energy and nuclear charge appears to be quadratic in nature. This pattern is expected according to the Bohr model, where ground-state energy is proportional to the square of the nuclear charge: \(E \propto -Z^2\)
04

Predicting ground-state energy of Be3+ ion

Following the derived relationship between ground-state energy and nuclear charge, we can now predict the ground-state energy for the Be3+ ion. By using the relation, the ground-state energy of Be3+ would be: \(E_{Be3} = k\left(-\left(Z_{Be3}\right)^2\right)\) Since k is a proportionality constant, we can find its value by using the known energy and charge values for one of the given ions, such as B4+: \(k = \frac{E_{B4}}{-\left(Z_{B4}\right)^2} = \frac{-150 \times 10^{-18} J}{-(4)^2} = -9.375 \times 10^{-18} J\) Now, we can predict the ground-state energy of Be3+: \(E_{Be3} = -9.375 \times 10^{-18} J \times \left(-\left(3\right)^2\right) = -84.375 \times 10^{-18} J\) So, the predicted ground-state energy for the Be3+ ion is -84.375 x 10^{-18} J.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

(a) Account for formation of the following series of oxides in terms of the electron configurations of the elements and the discussion of ionic compounds in Section 2.7: $\mathrm{K}_{2} \mathrm{O}, \mathrm{CaO}, \mathrm{Sc}_{2} \mathrm{O}_{3}, \mathrm{TiO}_{2}, \mathrm{~V}_{2} \mathrm{O}_{5}, \mathrm{CrO}_{3} .(\mathbf{b})$ Name these oxides. (c) Consider the metal oxides whose enthalpies of formation (in $\mathrm{kJ} \mathrm{mol}^{-1}$ ) are listed here. Calculate the enthalpy changes in the following general reaction for each case: $$\mathrm{M}_{n} \mathrm{O}_{m}(s)+\mathrm{H}_{2}(g) \longrightarrow n \mathrm{M}(s)+m \mathrm{H}_{2} \mathrm{O}(g)$$ (You will need to write the balanced equation for each case and then compute \(\left.\Delta H^{\circ} .\right)\) (d) Based on the data given, estimate a value of \(\Delta H_{f}^{\circ}\) for \(\mathrm{Sc}_{2} \mathrm{O}_{3}(s)\)

Identify the specific element that corresponds to each of the following electron configurations and indicate the number of unpaired electrons for each: (a) \(1 s^{2} 2 s^{2}\), (b) \(1 s^{2} 2 s^{2} 2 p^{4}\) (d) \([\mathrm{Kr}] 5 s^{2} 4 d^{10} 5 p^{4}\) (c) \([\mathrm{Ar}] 4 s^{1} 3 d^{5}\)

How many unique combinations of the quantum numbers \(l\) and \(m_{l}\) are there when (a) \(n=1,(\mathbf{b}) n=5 ?\)

A hydrogen atom orbital has \(n=4\) and \(m_{l}=-2\). (a) What are the possible values of \(l\) for this orbital? (b) What are the possible values of \(m_{s}\) for the orbital?

In the experiment shown schematically below, a beam of neutral atoms is passed through a magnetic field. Atoms that have unpaired electrons are deflected in different directions in the magnetic field depending on the value of the electron spin quantum number. In the experiment illustrated, we envision that a beam of hydrogen atoms splits into two beams. (a) What is the significance of the observation that the single beam splits into two beams? (b) What do you think would happen if the strength of the magnet were increased? (c) What do you think would happen if the beam of hydrogen atoms were replaced with a beam of helium atoms? Why? (d) The relevant experiment was first performed by Otto Stern and Walter Gerlach in \(1921 .\) They used a beam of \(\mathrm{Ag}\) atoms in the experiment. By considering the electron configuration of a silver atom, explain why the single beam splits into two beams.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Chemistry Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free