Detailed calculations show that the value of \(Z_{\text {eff }}\) for the outermost electrons in \(\mathrm{Si}\) and \(\mathrm{Cl}\) atoms is \(4.29+\) and \(6.12+,\) respectively. (a) What value do you estimate for \(Z_{\text {eff }}\) experienced by the outermost electron in both Si and Cl by assuming core electrons contribute 1.00 and valence electrons contribute 0.00 to the screening constant? (b) What values do you estimate for \(Z_{\text {eff }}\) using Slater's rules? (c) Which approach gives a more accurate estimate of \(Z_{\text {eff }} ?\) (d) Which method of approximation more accurately accounts for the steady increase in \(Z_{\text {eff }}\) that occurs upon moving left to right across a period? (e) Predict \(Z_{\text {eff }}\) for a valence electron in P, phosphorus, based on the calculations for \(\mathrm{Si}\) and \(\mathrm{Cl}\).

Short Answer

Expert verified
The simplified method for estimating the effective nuclear charge (\(Z_{\text{eff}}\)) is more accurate than Slater's rules when comparing values for Silicon (Si) and Chlorine (Cl). Using the simplified method, we predict the \(Z_{\text{eff}}\) value for a valence electron in Phosphorus (P) to be approximately 5.5.

Step by step solution

01

Understand the effective nuclear charge concept

The effective nuclear charge (\(Z_{\text{eff}}\)) is the net positive charge experienced by an electron in an atom. It is the difference between the positive charge of the nucleus and the negative charge of the screening electrons. The shielding effect of these screening electrons reduces the electromagnetic force experienced by the outermost electron, leading to a lower effective nuclear charge.
02

Calculate \(Z_{\text{eff}}\) with the simplified method

According to the simplified method, core electrons contribute 1.00 and valence electrons contribute 0.00 to the screening constant. For Silicon (Si): Atomic number Z = 14 (14 protons in nucleus) Core electrons: 1s, 2s, 2p (total 10) Valence electrons: 3s, 3p (total 4) Screening constant S = 10 x 1.00 + 4 x 0 = 10 \(Z_{\text{eff, Si}} = Z - S = 14 - 10 = 4\) For Chlorine (Cl): Atomic number Z = 17 (17 protons in nucleus) Core electrons: 1s, 2s, 2p, 3s (total 10) Valence electrons: 3p (total 7) Screening constant S = 10 x 1.00 + 7 x 0 = 10 \(Z_{\text{eff, Cl}} = Z - S = 17 - 10 = 7\)
03

Calculate \(Z_{\text{eff}}\) using Slater's rules

To calculate \(Z_{\text{eff}}\) using Slater's rules, we need to consider the contributions from all surrounding electrons to the screening constant. Slater's rules state that electrons in the same group shield the electron more effectively than those further away. For Silicon (Si): Following Slater's rules: S = 1s (2 * 0.3) + 2s, 2p (8 * 0.85) + 3s, 3p (4 * 1) = 0.6 + 6.8 + 4 = 11.4 \(Z_{\text{eff, Si}} = Z - S = 14 - 11.4 = 2.6\) For Chlorine (Cl): Following Slater's rules: S = 1s (2 * 0.35) + 2s, 2p (8 * 0.85) + 3s (2 * 1) + 3p (5 * 1) = 0.7 + 6.8 + 2 + 5 = 14.5 \(Z_{\text{eff, Cl}} = Z - S = 17 - 14.5 = 2.5\)
04

Compare the methods and determine the accuracy

Now we have calculated the \(Z_{\text{eff}}\) values using both methods, let's compare them with the given values: Simplified method: \(Z_{\text{eff, Si}}\) = 4 (compared to 4.29+) \(Z_{\text{eff, Cl}}\) = 7 (compared to 6.12+) Slater's rules: \(Z_{\text{eff, Si}}\) = 2.6 (compared to 4.29+) \(Z_{\text{eff, Cl}}\) = 2.5 (compared to 6.12+) The simplified method gives more accurate results, as its values are closer to the given values. Also, it can account for the steady increase in \(Z_{\text{eff}}\) that occurs upon moving left to right across a period.
05

Predict \(Z_{\text{eff}}\) for Phosphorus (P)

To predict the \(Z_{\text{eff}}\) for a valence electron in Phosphorus (P), we use the values calculated for Si and Cl: For Phosphorus (P), which lies between Si and Cl in the periodic table, we can make an approximation based on the simplified method (since it was more accurate): \(Z_{\text{eff, P}} \approx \frac{Z_{\text{eff, Si}} + Z_{\text{eff, Cl}}}{2} = \frac{4 + 7}{2} = 5.5\) Therefore, we predict the \(Z_{\text{eff}}\) value for a valence electron in Phosphorus (P) to be around 5.5.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Which will experience the greater effect nuclear charge, the electrons in the \(n=2\) shell in \(\mathrm{F}\) or the \(n=2\) shell in \(\mathrm{B}\) ? Which will be closer to the nucleus?

(a) If the core electrons were totally effective at screening the valence electrons and the valence electrons provided no screening for each other, what would be the effective nuclear charge acting on the \(3 s\) and \(3 p\) valence electrons in P? (b) Repeat these calculations using Slater's rules. (c) Detailed calculations indicate that the effective nuclear charge is \(5.6+\) for the \(3 s\) electrons and \(4.9+\) for the \(3 p\) electrons. Why are the values for the \(3 s\) and \(3 p\) electrons different? (d) If you remove a single electron from a Patom, which orbital will it come from?

It is possible to define metallic character as we do in this book and base it on the reactivity of the element and the ease with which it loses electrons. Alternatively, one could measure how well electricity is conducted by each of the elements to determine how "metallic" the elements are. On the basis of conductivity, there is not much of a trend in the periodic table: Silver is the most conductive metal, and manganese the least. Look up the first ionization energies of silver and manganese; which of these two elements would you call more metallic based on the way we define it in this book?

Write a balanced equation for the reaction that occurs in each of the following cases: (a) Potassium metal is exposed to an atmosphere of chlorine gas. (b) Strontium oxide is added to water. (c) A fresh surface of lithium metal is exposed to oxygen gas. (d) Sodium metal reacts with molten sulfur.

Copper and calcium both form +2 ions, but copper is far less reactive. Suggest an explanation, taking into account the ground-state electron configurations of these elements and their atomic radii.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Chemistry Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free