How would you expect the extent of overlap of the bonding atomic orbitals to vary in the series IF, ICl, IBr, and \(I_{2}\) ? Explain your answer.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The extent of overlap of the bonding atomic orbitals in the series IF, ICl, IBr, and I2 varies due to the size and electronegativity differences between the iodine and halogen atoms. The overlap is the least for IF and the greatest for I2, with ICl and IBr exhibiting intermediate overlap extents, as the size difference and electronegativity difference decrease in the order IF > ICl > IBr > I2.

Step by step solution

01

Analyze atomic size

In order to discuss the extent of the overlap of the bonding atomic orbitals in these compounds, we need to consider the size of the atoms involved. The size of the atoms generally increases going down a group in the periodic table. Therefore, among the halogens (F, Cl, Br, and I), fluorine is the smallest and iodine is the largest.
02

Review electronegativity differences

Electronegativity is the ability of an atom in a molecule to attract electrons to itself. In general, electronegativity decreases as we go down a group in the periodic table, so the electronegativity difference between iodine and the other halogens also plays a role in the extent of orbital overlap.
03

Consider atomic size and electronegativity differences for IF

In IF, the iodine atom is much larger than the fluorine atom, but the electronegativity difference is also significant. Due to the size difference, the extent of the overlap of the bonding atomic orbitals would be lesser compared to other molecules in the series.
04

Consider atomic size and electronegativity differences for ICl

In the ICl molecule, the size difference between iodine and chlorine atoms is smaller compared to IF, and the electronegativity difference is also smaller. As a result, the extent of the overlap of the bonding atomic orbitals in ICl would be greater than in IF but might still be lesser compared to IBr and I2.
05

Consider atomic size and electronegativity differences for IBr

In IBr, the size difference between iodine and bromine atoms is even smaller. The electronegativity difference is also smaller. Therefore, the extent of the overlap of the bonding atomic orbitals in IBr would be greater than in both IF and ICl.
06

Consider atomic size and electronegativity differences for I2

In the I2 molecule, both atoms are iodine, so there is no size difference and no electronegativity difference. As a result, the extent of the overlap of the bonding atomic orbitals would be the greatest among the molecules in this series.
07

Conclusion

The extent of overlap of the bonding atomic orbitals in the series IF, ICl, IBr, and I2 varies with the size and electronegativity differences between the atoms involved. The overlap would be the least for IF and the greatest for I2, with ICl and IBr exhibiting intermediate overlap extents in the series, as the size difference and electronegativity difference decrease in the order IF > ICl > IBr > I2.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

(a) Does \(C S_{2}\) have a dipole moment? If so, in which direction does the net dipole point? (b) Does \(\mathrm{SO}_{2}\) have a dipole moment? If so, in which direction does the net dipole point?

Draw the Lewis structure for each of the following molecules or ions, and predict their electron-domain and molecular geometries: (a) \(\mathrm{AsF}_{3}\) (b) \(\mathrm{CH}_{3}^{+},(\mathbf{c}) \mathrm{Br} \mathrm{F}_{3}\) (d) \(\mathrm{ClO}_{3}^{-}\) (e) \(\mathrm{XeF}_{2}\) (f) \(\mathrm{BrO}_{2}^{-}\).

(a) If the valence atomic orbitals of an atom are sp hybridized, how many unhybridized \(p\) orbitals remain in the valence shell? How many \(\pi\) bonds can the atom form? (b) Imagine that you could hold two atoms that are bonded together, twist them, and not change the bond length. Would it be easier to twist (rotate) around a single \(\sigma\) bond or around a double \((\sigma\) plus \(\pi)\) bond, or would they be the same?

(a) What is the difference between hybrid orbitals and molecular orbitals? (b) How many electrons can be placed into each MO of a molecule? (c) Can antibonding molecular orbitals have electrons in them?

Vinyl chloride, \(\mathrm{C}_{2} \mathrm{H}_{3} \mathrm{Cl}\), is a gas that is used to form the important polymer called polyvinyl chloride (PVC). Its Lewis structure is (a) What is the total number of valence electrons in the vinyl chloride molecule? (b) How many valence electrons are used to make \(\sigma\) bonds in the molecule? (c) How many valence electrons are used to make \(\pi\) bonds in the molecule? (d) How many valence electrons remain in nonbonding pairs in the molecule? (e) What is the hybridization at each carbon atom in the molecule?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Chemistry Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free