Chapter 23: Problem 105
Criticize and correct the following statement: strong-field ligands always give rise to low-spin complexes.
Short Answer
Expert verified
Strong-field ligands usually lead to low-spin complexes in octahedral geometries but not necessarily in tetrahedral geometries.
Step by step solution
01
- Understand the terms
To critique and correct the statement, first understand the terms: 'strong-field ligands' and 'low-spin complexes'. Strong-field ligands are ligands that cause a large splitting in the d-orbitals of the central metal ion. Low-spin complexes are those where electrons tend to pair up in the lower energy d-orbitals before occupying the higher energy ones.
02
- Review Crystal Field Theory
Crystal Field Theory helps in understanding how ligands interact with metal ions. It explains that the splitting of d-orbitals in a complex depends on the strength of the ligand field. Strong-field ligands cause a large splitting (Δ) of d-orbitals.
03
- Check the relationship
Strong-field ligands often result in low-spin configurations because the splitting energy (Δ) is larger than the pairing energy. However, there's an exception which needs to be considered.
04
- Consider Octahedral vs. Tetrahedral Configurations
In octahedral complexes, strong-field ligands usually lead to low-spin configurations. However, in tetrahedral complexes, the crystal field splitting energy (Δ_t) is generally smaller than the pairing energy, even with strong-field ligands. Thus, tetrahedral complexes with strong-field ligands do not always form low-spin complexes.
05
- Correct the Statement
The statement 'strong-field ligands always give rise to low-spin complexes' is incorrect. Correct it by stating that strong-field ligands tend to give rise to low-spin complexes in octahedral coordination, but not necessarily in tetrahedral coordination due to the smaller crystal field splitting energy.
Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!
-
Full Textbook Solutions
Get detailed explanations and key concepts
-
Unlimited Al creation
Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...
-
Ads-free access
To over 500 millions flashcards
-
Money-back guarantee
We refund you if you fail your exam.
Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!
Key Concepts
These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.
Strong-Field Ligands
Strong-field ligands are crucial in Crystal Field Theory. These ligands create a significant splitting in the d-orbitals of the central metal ion. This splitting is denoted as \(\Delta\). Because strong-field ligands produce a larger \(\Delta\), they often influence the electron configuration in metal complexes significantly. Examples of strong-field ligands include CN-, CO, and NH3. These ligands encourage the pairing of electrons within the lower energy d-orbitals, contributing to the formation of specific types of complexes. Understanding how strong-field ligands affect d-orbital splitting is essential for predicting the properties and behaviors of metal complexes.
Low-Spin Complexes
Low-spin complexes occur when electrons pair up in the lower energy d-orbitals before occupying higher energy orbitals. This happens when the crystal field splitting energy (\(\Delta\)) is larger than the pairing energy. As a result, strong-field ligands often lead to low-spin complexes because they create a sufficiently large splitting in the d-orbitals. In such complexes, the electrons remain paired in the lower energy orbitals, minimizing the number of unpaired electrons. The low-spin configuration affects the magnetic properties of the complex, usually resulting in diamagnetic or weakly paramagnetic behavior.
d-Orbital Splitting
d-Orbital splitting is central to understanding the behavior of complexes in Crystal Field Theory. The interaction between ligands and metal ions causes the degenerate d-orbitals to split into different energy levels. In an octahedral field, this splitting results in two sets of orbitals: the lower-energy \(t_{2g}\) orbitals and the higher-energy \(e_g\) orbitals. The energy difference between these orbitals is called \(\Delta_o\) (octahedral field splitting energy). For tetrahedral complexes, the splitting is smaller and reversed, resulting in \(\Delta_t\). The extent of this splitting determines whether a metal complex will be high-spin or low-spin, which is critical in predicting its properties and reactivity.
Octahedral Complexes
Octahedral complexes are prevalent in coordination chemistry, consisting of a central metal ion surrounded by six ligands arranged at the corners of an octahedron. In these complexes, the splitting of d-orbitals is extensive due to the geometry, resulting in a larger \(\(\Delta_o\)\). Strong-field ligands in octahedral complexes typically lead to low-spin configurations. This is because the energy to pair electrons is less than the energy required to occupy the higher energy \(e_g\) orbitals. Consequently, electrons pair in the \(t_{2g}\) orbitals, reducing the number of unpaired electrons and affecting the complex's magnetic and electronic properties.
Tetrahedral Complexes
Tetrahedral complexes, composed of a central metal ion coordinated to four ligands, exhibit different d-orbital splitting characteristics. The splitting energy in tetrahedral complexes, denoted as \(\(\Delta_t\)\), is smaller compared to octahedral complexes. This is because the ligands are positioned further apart, leading to a weaker crystal field. As a result, even strong-field ligands may not produce a large enough \(\(\Delta_t\)\) to overcome the pairing energy. This often results in high-spin configurations rather than low-spin ones. Therefore, in tetrahedral complexes, strong-field ligands do not guarantee the formation of low-spin complexes, highlighting the significance of geometry in crystal field splitting.