When neptunium (Np) and plutonium (Pu) were discovered, the periodic table did
not include the actinides, so these elements were placed in Groups \(7
\mathrm{~B}(7)\) and \(8 \mathrm{~B}(8) .\) When americium (Am) and curium (Cm)
were synthesized, they were placed in Groups \(8 \mathrm{~B}(9)\) and \(8
\mathrm{~B}(10) .\) However, during chemical isolation procedures, Glenn
Seaborg and his colleagues, who had synthesized these elements, could not find
their compounds among other compounds of members of the same groups, which led
Seaborg to suggest they were part of a new inner transition series.
(a) How do the electron configurations of these elements support Seaborg's
suggestion?
(b) The highest fluorides of \(\mathrm{Np}\) and \(\mathrm{Pu}\) are
hexafluorides, and the highest fluoride of uranium is also the hexafluoride.
How does this chemical evidence support the placement of \(\mathrm{Np}\) and
\(\mathrm{Pu}\) as inner transition elements rather than transition elements?