The following data are obtained for the initial rates of reaction in the reaction \(A+2B+C \longrightarrow 2 D+E.\) $$\begin{array}{lllll} \hline & \text { Initial } & \text { Initial } & & \\ \text { Expt } & \text { [A], M } & \text { [B],M } & \text { [C], M } & \text { Initial Rate } \\ \hline 1 & 1.40 & 1.40 & 1.00 & R_{1} \\ 2 & 0.70 & 1.40 & 1.00 & R_{2}=\frac{1}{2} \times R_{1} \\ 3 & 0.70 & 0.70 & 1.00 & R_{3}=\frac{1}{4} \times R_{2} \\ 4 & 1.40 & 1.40 & 0.50 & R_{4}=16 \times R_{3} \\ 5 & 0.70 & 0.70 & 0.50 & R_{5}=? \\ \hline \end{array}$$ (a) What are the reaction orders with respect to A, B, and C? (b) What is the value of \(R_{5}\) in terms of \(R_{1} ?\)

Short Answer

Expert verified
The reaction is first order with respect to A, second order with respect to B, and negative first order with respect to C. The value of \(R_{5}\) in terms of \(R_{1}\) is one half, (\(R_{5} = \frac{1}{2} * R_{1}\)).

Step by step solution

01

Consider Experiments 1 and 2

The initial concentration of A is halved between these experiments, from 1.40 M to 0.70 M, while the concentrations of B and C remained constant. As a result, the initial rate \(R_2\) becomes half of \(R_1\). From this, one can infer that the reaction is first order with respect to A, as decreasing the concentration of A by half causes a similar decrease in the rate.
02

Consider Experiments 2 and 3

The initial concentration of B is halved between these experiments, from 1.40 M to 0.70 M, while the concentrations of A and C remained constant. As a result, the rate \(R_3\) is one-fourth of \(R_2\). This suggests that the reaction is second order with respect to B, because halving B's concentration quadruples the reduction.
03

Consider Experiments 3 and 4

The initial concentration of C (a reactant) is halved between these two experiments, from 1.00 M to 0.50 M, while A and B remain constant. The rate for Experiment 4, \(R_4\), is 16 times \(R_3\). Therefore, the reaction is negative first order with respect to C, meaning that halving C's concentration increases the rate 16 times.
04

Combine Orders

The overall reaction order is the sum of the orders with respect to each reactant. Therefore, the reaction is overall second order since it's first order in A, second order in B, and negative first order in C.
05

Calculate the value of \(R_5\)

To find the value of \(R_5\), compare experiments 4 and 5 as both have the same initial concentrations for A and C but a halving of B’s concentration. Because the reaction is second order with respect to B, halving the initial concentration of B from experiment 4 to 5 should make the rate one fourth in the rate from experiment 4, therefore \(R_5 = \frac{1}{4} * R_4 = \frac{1}{4} * 16 * R_3 = 4 * R_3\). Using experiment 3, we know that \(R_3 = \frac{1}{4} * R_2\). Therefore, \(R_5 = 4 * \frac{1}{4} * R_2 = R_2\). We also know that \(R_2 = \frac{1}{2} * R_1\), therefore, \(R_5 = \frac{1}{2} * R_1\).

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

For the first-order reaction $$\mathrm{N}_{2} \mathrm{O}_{5}(\mathrm{g}) \longrightarrow 2 \mathrm{NO}_{2}(\mathrm{g})+\frac{1}{2} \mathrm{O}_{2}(\mathrm{g})$$ \(t_{1 / 2}=22.5 \mathrm{h}\) at \(20^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\) and \(1.5 \mathrm{h}\) at \(40^{\circ} \mathrm{C}.\) (a) Calculate the activation energy of this reaction. (b) If the Arrhenius constant \(A=2.05 \times 10^{13} \mathrm{s}^{-1}\) determine the value of \(k\) at \(30^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\).

The reaction \(A+B \longrightarrow C+D\) is second order in \(A\) and zero order in B. The value of \(k\) is \(0.0103 \mathrm{M}^{-1} \mathrm{min}^{-1}.\) What is the rate of this reaction when \([\mathrm{A}]=0.116 \mathrm{M}\) and \([\mathrm{B}]=3.83 \mathrm{M} ?\)

A kinetic study of the reaction \(A \longrightarrow\) products yields the data: \(t=0 \mathrm{s},[\mathrm{A}]=2.00 \mathrm{M} ; 500 \mathrm{s}, 1.00 \mathrm{M}; 1500 \mathrm{s}, 0.50 \mathrm{M} ; 3500 \mathrm{s}, 0.25 \mathrm{M} .\) Without performing detailed calculations, determine the order of this reaction and indicate your method of reasoning.

Suppose that the reaction in Example 14-8 is first order with a rate constant of \(0.12 \mathrm{min}^{-1}\). Starting with \([\mathrm{A}]_{0}=1.00 \mathrm{M},\) will the curve for \([\mathrm{A}]\) versus \(t\) for the first-order reaction cross the curve for the second-order reaction at some time after \(t=0 ?\) Will the two curves cross if \([\mathrm{A}]_{0}=2.00 \mathrm{M} ?\) In each case, if the curves are found to cross, at what time will this happen?

The reaction \(A+B \longrightarrow\) products is first order in \(A\) first order in \(\mathrm{B},\) and second order overall. Consider that the starting concentrations of the reactants are \([\mathrm{A}]_{0}\) and [ \(\mathrm{B}]_{0},\) and that \(x\) represents the decrease in these concentrations at the time \(t .\) That is, \([\mathrm{A}]_{t}=[\mathrm{A}]_{0}-x\) and \([\mathrm{B}]_{t}=[\mathrm{B}]_{0}-x .\) Show that the integrated rate law for this reaction can be expressed as shown below. $$\ln \frac{[\mathrm{A}]_{0} \times[\mathrm{B}]_{t}}{[\mathrm{B}]_{0} \times[\mathrm{A}]_{t}}=\left([\mathrm{B}]_{0}-[\mathrm{A}]_{0}\right) \times k t$$

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Chemistry Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free