You want to test the following proposed mechanism for the oxidation of HBr. $$\begin{array}{c} \mathrm{HBr}+\mathrm{O}_{2} \stackrel{k_{1}}{\longrightarrow} \mathrm{HOOBr} \\\ \mathrm{HOOBr}+\mathrm{HBr} \stackrel{k_{2}}{\longrightarrow} 2 \mathrm{HOBr} \\\ \mathrm{HOBr}+\mathrm{HBr} \stackrel{k_{3}}{\longrightarrow} \mathrm{H}_{2} \mathrm{O}+\mathrm{Br}_{2} \end{array}$$ You find that the rate is first order with respect to HBr and to \(\mathrm{O}_{2}\). You cannot detect HOBr among the products. (a) If the proposed mechanism is correct, which must be the rate-determining step? (b) Can you prove the mechanism from these observations? (c) Can you disprove the mechanism from these observations?

Short Answer

Expert verified
The rate-determining step for the mechanism is the first one. Based on the provided data, it isn't possible to confirm or prove that this mechanism is correct and the absence of HOBr in the reaction products suggests that the proposed mechanism is incorrect.

Step by step solution

01

Determine the Rate-Determining Step

A rate-determining step is the slowest step in a reaction mechanism and this step determines the overall reaction rate. The given information states that the rate of the reaction is first order with respect to both HBr and O2, which indicates that the concentration of both these molecules affect the rate of reaction. Additionally, both HBr and O2 are in the first step of the mechanism. Therefore, the first step must be the rate-determining step: \nHBr + O2 -> HOOBr
02

Check the Possibility of Proving the Mechanism

To prove a mechanism, it's necessary to validate each step either experimentally or through strong theoretical justification. In this case, even though the first step matches the reaction's order, there are still possibilities for other mechanisms that could also satisfy the order. Especially, we have no validations (experimental or theoretical) for the remaining steps. So based on the observations we cannot unequivocally prove this mechanism.
03

Analyze the Mechanism for Disproof

The product, HOBR, which is a major intermediate product (according to the proposed mechanism), is not detected during the reaction. This evidence contradicts the second and third steps of the proposed mechanism. Therefore, we can say that the proposed mechanism is most probably wrong.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The object is to study the kinetics of the reaction between peroxodisulfate and iodide ions. $$\begin{aligned} &\text { (a) } \mathrm{S}_{2} \mathrm{O}_{8}^{2-}(\mathrm{aq})+3 \mathrm{I}^{-}(\mathrm{aq}) \longrightarrow 2 \mathrm{SO}_{4}^{2-}(\mathrm{aq})+\mathrm{I}_{3}^{-}(\mathrm{aq}) \end{aligned}$$ The \(I_{3}^{-}\) formed in reaction (a) is actually a complex of iodine, \(\mathrm{I}_{2},\) and iodide ion, \(\mathrm{I}^{-}\). Thiosulfate ion, \(\mathrm{S}_{2} \mathrm{O}_{3}^{2-}\) also present in the reaction mixture, reacts with \(\mathrm{I}_{3}^{-}\) just as fast as it is formed. $$\text { (b) } 2 \mathrm{S}_{2} \mathrm{O}_{3}^{2-}(\mathrm{aq})+\mathrm{I}_{3}^{-}(\mathrm{aq}) \longrightarrow \mathrm{S}_{4} \mathrm{O}_{6}^{2-}+3 \mathrm{I}^{-}(\mathrm{aq})$$ When all of the thiosulfate ion present initially has been consumed by reaction (b), a third reaction occurs between \(\mathrm{I}_{3}^{-}(\mathrm{aq})\) and starch, which is also present in the reaction mixture. $$\text { (c) } \mathrm{I}_{3}^{-}(\mathrm{aq})+\operatorname{starch} \longrightarrow \text { blue complex }$$ The rate of reaction (a) is inversely related to the time required for the blue color of the starch-iodine complex to appear. That is, the faster reaction (a) proceeds, the more quickly the thiosulfate ion is consumed in reaction (b), and the sooner the blue color appears in reaction (c). One of the photographs shows the initial colorless solution and an electronic timer set at \(t=0 ;\) the other photograph shows the very first appearance of the blue complex (after 49.89 s). Tables I and II list some actual student data obtained in this study. $$\begin{array}{l} \hline\text { TABLE I } \\ \text { Reaction conditions at } 24^{\circ} \mathrm{C}: 25.0 \mathrm{mL} \text { of the } \\ \left(\mathrm{NH}_{4}\right)_{2} \mathrm{S}_{2} \mathrm{O}_{8}(\text { aq) listed, } 25.0 \mathrm{mL} \text { of the } \mathrm{KI}(\mathrm{aq}) \\ \text { listed, } 10.0 \mathrm{mL} \text { of } 0.010 \mathrm{M} \mathrm{Na}_{2} \mathrm{S}_{2} \mathrm{O}_{3}(\mathrm{aq}), \text { and } 5.0 \mathrm{mL} \\ \text { starch solution are mixed. The time is that of the } \\ \text { first appearance of the starch-iodine complex. } \\ \hline & \text { Initial Concentrations, } \mathrm{M} \\ \hline \text { Experiment } & \left(\mathrm{NH}_{4}\right)_{2} \mathrm{S}_{2} \mathrm{O}_{8} & \mathrm{KI} & \text { Time, s } \\ \hline 1 & 0.20 & 0.20 & 21 \\ 2 & 0.10 & 0.20 & 42 \\ 3 & 0.050 & 0.20 & 81 \\ 4 & 0.20 & 0.10 & 42 \\ 5 & 0.20 & 0.050 & 79 \\ \hline \end{array}$$ $$\begin{array}{l} \hline \text { TABLE II } \\ \text { Reaction conditions: those listed in Table I for } \\ \text { Experiment } 4, \text { but at the temperatures listed. } \\ \hline \text { Experiment } & \text { Temperature, }^{\circ} \mathrm{C} & \text { Time, } \mathrm{s} \\ \hline 6 & 3 & 189 \\ 7 & 13 & 88 \\ 8 & 24 & 42 \\ 9 & 33 & 21 \\ \hline \end{array}$$ (a) Use the data in Table I to establish the order of reaction (a) with respect to \(\mathrm{S}_{2} \mathrm{O}_{8}^{2-}\) and to I \(^{-}\). What is the overall reaction order? [Hint: How are the times required for the blue complex to appear related to the actual rates of reaction? (b) Calculate the initial rate of reaction in Experiment 1 expressed in \(\mathrm{M} \mathrm{s}^{-1} .\) [Hint: You must take into account the dilution that occurs when the various solutions are mixed, as well as the reaction stoichiometry indicated by equations \((a),(b), \text { and }(c) .]\) (c) Calculate the value of the rate constant, \(k,\) based on experiments 1 and 2 (d) Calculate the rate constant, \(k\), for the four different temperatures in Table II. (e) Determine the activation energy, \(E_{\mathrm{a}}\), of the peroxodisulfate- iodide ion reaction. (f) The following mechanism has been proposed for reaction (a). The first step is slow, and the others are fast. $$\begin{array}{c} \mathrm{I}^{-}+\mathrm{S}_{2} \mathrm{O}_{8}^{2-} \longrightarrow \mathrm{IS}_{2} \mathrm{O}_{8}^{3-} \\ \mathrm{IS}_{2} \mathrm{O}_{8}^{3-} \longrightarrow 2 \mathrm{SO}_{4}^{2-}+\mathrm{I}^{+} \\ \mathrm{I}^{+}+\mathrm{I}^{-} \longrightarrow \mathrm{I}_{2} \\ \mathrm{I}_{2}+\mathrm{I}^{-} \longrightarrow \mathrm{I}_{3}^{-} \end{array}$$ Show that this mechanism is consistent with both the stoichiometry and the rate law of reaction (a). Explain why it is reasonable to expect the first step in the mechanism to be slower than the others.

The half-life of the radioactive isotope phosphorus- 32 is 14.3 days. How long does it take for a sample of phosphorus-32 to lose \(99 \%\) of its radioactivity?

The mechanism proposed for the reaction of \(\mathrm{H}_{2}(\mathrm{g})\) and \(\mathrm{I}_{2}(\mathrm{g})\) to form \(\mathrm{HI}(\mathrm{g})\) consists of a fast reversible first step involving \(\mathrm{I}_{2}(\mathrm{g})\) and \(\mathrm{I}(\mathrm{g}),\) followed by a slow step. Propose a two-step mechanism for the reaction \(\mathrm{H}_{2}(\mathrm{g})+\mathrm{I}_{2}(\mathrm{g}) \longrightarrow 2 \mathrm{HI}(\mathrm{g}),\) which is known to be first order in \(\mathrm{H}_{2}\) and first order in \(\mathrm{I}_{2}.\)

The following data are for the reaction \(2 \mathrm{A}+\mathrm{B} \longrightarrow\) products. Establish the order of this reaction with respect to A and to B. $$\begin{array}{cccc} \hline \text { Expt 1, }[\mathrm{B}]=1.00 \mathrm{M} & & {\text { Expt 2, }[\mathrm{B}]=0.50 \mathrm{M}} \\ \hline \begin{array}{cccc} \text { Time, } \\ \text { min } \end{array} & \begin{array}{c} \text { [A], M } \\ \end{array} & \text { Time, } \text { min } &\text { [A], M } \\ \hline 0 & 1.000 \times 10^{-3} & 0 & 1.000 \times 10^{-3} \\ 1 & 0.951 \times 10^{-3} & 1 & 0.975 \times 10^{-3} \\ 5 & 0.779 \times 10^{-3} & 5 & 0.883 \times 10^{-3} \\ 10 & 0.607 \times 10^{-3} & 10 & 0.779 \times 10^{-3} \\ 20 & 0.368 \times 10^{-3} & 20 & 0.607 \times 10^{-3} \\ \hline \end{array}$$

If the plot of the reactant concentration versus time is nonlinear, but the concentration drops by \(50 \%\) every 10 seconds, then the order of the reaction is (a) zero order; (b) first order; (c) second order; (d) third order.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Chemistry Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free